Afro-Asiatic languages are characterized by a âroot and patternâ system in which the basic meaning of a word is manifested in the consonants alone. The sequence of vowels, which is known as the pattern, adds grammatical information and may modify the basic lexical meaning of the root, sometimes in combination with prefixes or suffixes. The root k-t-b-, which means âwriteâ in Arabic, provides illuminating examples: adding the vowel pattern -a-a-a yields the form kataba âhe has written,â while the zero-initial pattern Ă-u(-Ă) plus the prefix ya- and the suffix -u yields ya-ktub-u âhe is writing.â
It is no coincidence that the West Semitic quasi-alphabets, which developed in the 2nd millennium bce and from which all later Afro-Asiatic writing systems derive (including tifinagh of the Amazigh), are made up of signs that represent a consonant followed by any or no vowel, thus reflecting the structural properties of this characteristic root and pattern system.
The nominal system
The distinction of masculine and feminine genders in nouns and pronouns (in the second and third person, and both singular and plural) is maintained widely but has been lost in some subdivisions of Chadic and Omotic. In Semitic and Cushitic languages, a noun may change its gender when it changes from singular to plural, a feature known as âgender polarity.â For example, in the Cushitic language Burunge, kori âyearâ is a masculine noun, but korara âyearsâ is feminine. Other languages use common gender in the plural (i.e., there is no gender distinction in the plural).
A notable historical feature is âgender stability,â meaning that words for common things tend to share the same gender across the languages of the Afro-Asiatic phylum, no matter whether or not the particular words are cognate across the specific languages in question. For instance, the word for âbloodâ is always masculine, although the forms of the word clearly have different origins: ahni in Tuareg (an Amazigh language), *bar in Proto-Chadic, boy in Beja (Cushitic), snf in Egyptian, and dam in Hebrew (Semitic).
Forms used as demonstratives, articles, gender markers, and the like share common elements that may occur singly or in combination in order to mark these features (such as the masculine singular, feminine singular, and the common plural). Examples include *n, *k, and *u or *w for masculine and *t and *i for feminine, as well as elements of more limited distribution, such as *l, *h, and *ĆĄ or *s, which are used to form further demonstratives and the like.
Very similar pronouns are used in verb conjugation in both prefix and suffix position to indicate the person, gender, and number of the subject. For example, the third person singular feminine prefixes *ta- or *ti- can be found in Amazigh (t-dawa âshe healedâ), in the Chadic language Hausa (tĂĄ-sĂ yĂĄa âwhen she boughtâ), in the Cushitic language Bedawi (ti-dbĂl âshe collectedâ), and in the Semitic language Akkadian (ta-prus âshe dividedâ). The corresponding suffix is found in conjugations in Amazigh (-t), Egyptian (-tj), and Semitic (*-at). Different but similar sets of suffixed pronouns are used to indicate object and possessor.
Other common elements can be found in noun derivation and inflection. A widespread element of derivation is *m-, used to derive agentive, locative, and instrumental nouns from verbs: compare the Arabic agentive mu-katib-un âthe corresponding oneâ with the locative ma-ktab-un âthe place to writeâ or âthe school,â both of which are derived from the verb âto write.â Quite similar examples occur (for instance) in the Chadic language Hausa: mĂĄ-hĂ if-Ăi âfather (the begetting one),â mĂĄ-hĂĄif-ĂĄa âbirthplace, womb,â both of which are from the verb âto procreate, beget, give birth.â
Some Afro-Asiatic languages mark nouns for number in a manner quite different from that used in most Indo-European languages. Whereas English, for example, usually differentiates only between singular and plural, Classical Semitic and Egyptian routinely distinguished between singular, dual, and plural. This system has left traces in other divisions of Afro-Asiatic, which tend to have a rich array of plural marking devices. Some devices originate in the verbal system, where they mark plurality of action, actor, goal, or location. An example from the Chadic language Lamang is kÉla âtake,â kala âtake many,â and kalala âtake many here and there.â Noun plurals may be formed through the addition of affixes such as -uu or -w, and -n, which are particularly well attested, or through internal inflection. So, for example, in the Chadic language Hausa, âspearâ is rendered mĂĄashĂŹi while the plural form, mĂĄasĂșu, is created through a change in suffix. In contrast, the Amazigh for âwall,â agadir, becomes the plural form igudar through a change in internal inflection.
Together, the forms of pluralization combine to form âbrokenâ plurals, such as in the Semitic language GeÊżez, in which nÉgus âkingâ becomes nĂ€gĂ€s-t âkings.â Chadic and Cushitic languages also use repetition of final consonants, partly in combination with vowel changes, as in Hausa tĂĄfkĂŹi âlakeâ and tĂĄfĂșkkĂ a âlakes,â and ឳåfĂ a âleg, footâ and its plural, ឳåfĂ afĂșu.