history of Chile
-
Where is Chile located?
Chile is located along the western seaboard of South America. It stretches about 2,700 miles (4,300 km) from its border with Peru to Cape Horn, near the tip of South America. This long, narrow country is bordered by Peru and Bolivia to the north, Argentina to the east, and the Pacific Ocean to the west. Chile possesses a diverse range of climates, from the arid desert in the north to the humid, cool conditions in the south. The central region has a temperate climate where the majority of the population resides.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Who lived in Chile before European explorers arrived?
Before the arrival of European explorers, Chile was inhabited by various Indigenous peoples. In northern Chile, tribes engaged in fishing and oasis farming fell under the influence of the Inca Empire in the 15th century. The Mapuche people resided in the south, living in scattered farming villages throughout the Central Valley. Additionally, the Diaguita inhabited areas of Chile and northwest Argentina, developing unique pottery, textiles and metallurgy. These groups, particularly the Mapuche, fiercely resisted both the Inca and later the Spanish incursions.
6 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Which country colonized Chile in the 16th century?
In the mid-16th century, Spain began the conquest of Chile. The Spanish conquest started in 1536-37, but it was in 1540-41 that Pedro de Valdivia was granted a license to colonize the area. In 1541, Valdivia and his company founded Santiago.
Because Chile had limited amounts of precious metals, the Spanish settlers focused on agriculture. By the end of the 16th century, there were only about 5,000 Spanish settlers in Chile.
4 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How did Chile gain its independence?
Chile's move toward independence began on September 18, 1810, when a junta was established in Santiago to replace the governor-general. Bernardo OâHiggins and JosĂ© de San MartĂn led patriot forces against the royalists, achieving a crucial victory at the Battle of Chacabuco in 1817.
OâHiggins was proclaimed supreme director of Chile, and independence was formally declared on February 12, 1818. The triumph at the Battle of MaipĂș secured Chile's freedom from Spanish rule, although Spain held the island of ChiloĂ© until 1826.
4 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What role did Augusto Pinochet play in Chilean history?
Augusto Pinochet played a significant and controversial role in Chilean history as the leader of the military junta that overthrew the socialist government of President Salvador Allende on September 11, 1973. Pinochet led Chile's military government from 1974 to 1990, during which his regime arrested and tortured tens of thousands of opponents.
Pinochet's policies led to a reversal of Allende's socialist policies and encouraged free enterprise, which resulted in an economic boom but also caused unemployment and a decline in real wages. Despite being rejected in a 1988 plebiscite, Pinochet remained in office until 1990. Even after stepping down, he continued to influence Chilean politics as commander of the armed forces and later as a senator for life. Pinochet's legacy is marked by both economic transformation and severe human rights abuses.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How has Chile's government and society changed in recent decades?
Chile's government and society have undergone significant transformations in recent decades. The military junta, led by Augusto Pinochet, seized power in 1973, initiating an authoritarian dictatorship that lasted until 1990. This period saw the suppression of political parties and widespread human rights abuses.
In 1988, voters rejected Pinochet in a plebiscite, paving the way for democratic elections. Patricio Aylwin won the presidential election in 1989, marking a transition to civilian government. Democratic systems continued to strengthen, and in 2000, Ricardo Lagos became Chile's first socialist president since Allende, followed by Michelle Bachelet in 2006, the first female president.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
history of Chile, a survey of important events and people in the history of Chile from the time of European settlement. Situated along the western seaboard of South America, Chile extends approximately 2,700 miles (4,300 km) from its boundary with Peru to the tip of South America at Cape Horn. A long, narrow country, it is bounded on the north by Peru and Bolivia, on the east by Argentina, and on the west by the Pacific Ocean. Chile exhibits many of the traits that typically characterize Latin American countries. It was colonized by Spain, and the culture that evolved was largely Spanish. However, appreciation for the influence of Indigenous culture has been growing. Chile has a history of retaining representative democratic government. Except for a military junta that held power from September 1973 to March 1990, the country has been relatively free of the coups and constitutional suspensions common to many of its neighbors.
Precolonial period in Chile
At the time of the Spanish conquest of Chile in the mid-16th century, at least 500,000 Indigenous people inhabited the region. Nearly all of the scattered tribes were related in language, but they lacked any central governmental organization. The groups in northern Chile lived by fishing and by farming in the oases. In the 15th century they fell under the influence of expanding civilizations from Peru, first the Chincha and then the Quechua, who formed part of the extensive Inca empire. Those invaders also tried unsuccessfully to conquer central and southern Chile.
The Araucanian peoples were dispersed throughout southern Chile. These mobile peoples lived in family clusters and small villages. A few engaged in subsistence agriculture, but most thrived from hunting, gathering, fishing, trading, and warring. The Araucanians resisted the Spanish as they had the Incas, but fighting and disease reduced their numbers by two-thirds during the first century after the Europeans arrived.
The Spanish conquest of Chile began in 1536â37, when forces under Diego de Almagro, associate and subsequent rival of Francisco Pizarro, invaded the region as far south as the Maule River in search of an âOtro Peruâ (âAnother Peruâ). Finding neither a high civilization nor gold, the Spaniards decided to return immediately to Peru. The discouraging reports brought back by Almagroâs men forestalled further attempts at conquest until 1540â41, when Pizarro, after the death of Almagro, granted Pedro de Valdivia license to conquer and colonize the area. Valdivia, with about 150 companions, including his mistress, InĂ©s SuĂĄrez, the only Spanish woman in the company, entered Chile in late 1540 and founded Santiago (February 12, 1541). For the next two decades the settlers lived a precarious existence and were constantly threatened by Indigenous people, who resisted enslavement. Before the safety of the colony was guaranteed, land was apportioned to the conquerors, and thus began the system of large estates. The estates were later institutionalized through the mayorazgo, a practice of transmitting estates by entail.
Valdivia did not undertake the conquest of the region south of the BiobĂo River until 1550. In that year ConcepciĂłn was founded, and preparations were made to move southward. During the next two years settlements and forts were established in La Frontera, but in 1553 the Araucanians, under a skilled military chieftain named Lautaro, rose in a revolt that led to the capture and death of Valdivia and to the beginning of a costly struggle. The Araucanians, often referred to as the Apache of South America, kept the struggle alive until the 1880s by successfully adapting their way of life and military tactics to changing conditions.
Although ConcepciĂłn was destroyed on several occasions, it remained as the Spanish outpost in the south as did La Serena, founded in 1544, in the north. The province of Cuyo held the same position east of the Andes until 1776, when it was made a part of the newly created Viceroyalty of the RĂo de la Plata. The conquest of Chile was finally consolidated during the late 1550s under Gov. Don GarcĂa Hurtado de Mendoza. Before the end of the 16th century English pirates and freebooters, including Sir Francis Drake and Thomas Cavendish, and later Dutch adventurers harassed the coast in search of sudden wealth and as part of a prolonged effort to force Spain to permit neutral countries to trade with its New World colonies.
Colonial period
Because only quite limited amounts of precious metal were found in Chile, the settlers early turned their attention to agriculture. They grew a wide variety of cereals, vegetables, and fruits; raised livestock; and consumed nearly all of their production locally. Largely because of the poverty of the colony, there were never more than a few thousand enslaved Black people; and, because the Indigenous people proved to be an unreliable source of labor, the settlers often had to work the fields themselves. The lack of mineral wealth also made the area unattractive to Spaniards, and at the end of the 16th century there were no more than 5,000 Spanish settlers in the entire colony. In this regard it should be pointed out that, beginning in 1600 and continuing until trade restrictions were relaxed in the late colonial period, Chile was a âdeficit areaâ in the empire, and the Spanish crown had to provide an annual subsidy to meet the expense of maintaining officials in Santiago and an army on the Araucanian frontier.
Chile lived under the same administrative and religious systems as its neighbors, but because the colony was poor, there was until the 18th century a tendency to send mediocre officials to preside over its destinies. The Spanish crown and the Roman Catholic Church combined to limit the colonistsâ administrative experience and economic development. The power of the captain-general, the highest royal official in the colony, was absolute. Appeals to the viceroy in Peru or the king in Spain were always possible, at least in theory. Chilean trade was tightly controlled from Peru. The influence of the Catholic Church in secular affairs was always significant and frequently decisive.
The most apparent social development after 1600 was the rapid growth of a mestizo (mixed Indigenous and European) group, which gives present-day Chile its homogeneous ethnic character. By the end of the colonial period, when the population reached an estimated 500,000 (not including unsubjugated Indigenous persons), approximately 300,000 were mestizos and about 150,000 were Creoles (native-born persons of European descent). About 20,000 were peninsulares (recently arrived Spaniards), perhaps 15,000 were Black people, and a handful were recently emancipated Indigenous persons. Society was highly structured, with peninsulares at the top, followed by Creoles, mestizos, Indigenous persons, and enslaved Africans. At the end of the colonial period, the vast majority of the population was concentrated in the Aconcagua Valley and the Central Valley (extending from Santiago to ConcepciĂłn), which together form âthe cradle of Chilean nationality.â
Education in colonial Chile was almost a complete monopoly of the Roman Catholic clergy and reinforced the societyâs strong class differences. In 1758, however, courses were opened in the Royal and Pontifical University of San Felipe at Santiago and attracted students from the Spanish colonies across the Andes. Nonetheless, intellectual life in Chile developed slowly. The colony did not have a printing press until shortly before it won independence from Spain in 1818, and the paucity of contacts with the outside world reinforced its insularity.
Struggle for Chilean independence
Despite the colonyâs isolation, its inhabitants at the start of the 19th century were affected by developments elsewhere. The most significant of those developments were the winning of independence by the 13 Anglo-American colonies and by Haiti, the French Revolution, and the inability of Spain to defend its system in America, as indicated by the British invasion of the La Plata region and increased contraband trade on the part of British and U.S. citizens. Finally and decisively came the intervention of Napoleon in Spain, an act that in 1808 threw Chile and the other colonies on their own resources and led them to take the first steps toward greater autonomy and self-government. In Chile the initial move toward independence was made on September 18, 1810, when a cabildo abierto (open town meeting) in Santiago, attended by representatives of privileged groups whose vaguely defined objectives included a change in administration, accepted the resignation of the president-governor and in his place elected a junta composed of local leaders.
From 1810 to 1813 the course of the patriots was relatively peaceful because they were able to maintain themselves without formal ties to the Viceroyalty of Lima. Trade restrictions were relaxed, steps were taken toward the eventual abolition of slavery, a newspaper was established to publicize the beliefs of the patriots, and education was promoted, including the founding of the National Institute. However, the embers of civil strife were also fanned. The Creoles were divided over how far the colony should go toward self-government. JosĂ© Miguel Carrera and his brothers, whose desire for complete independence was equaled if not surpassed by their personal ambition, inflamed the issues. Meanwhile, Spain had taken steps to reassert its control over the colony. At the Battle of Rancagua, on October 1 and 2, 1814, it reestablished its military supremacy and ended what has been called la patria vieja (âthe old fatherlandâ).
Following the defeat at Rancagua, patriot leaders, among them the Carrera brothers and Bernardo OâHiggins, future director-dictator of Chile, migrated to Argentina. There OâHiggins won the support of JosĂ© de San MartĂn, who, with the support of the revolutionary government in Buenos Aires, was raising an army to free the southern portion of the continent by first liberating Chile and then attacking Peru from the sea. The Carreras continued their spirited agitation for independence in Buenos Aires and the United States.
Meanwhile, many of those who remained in Chile suffered from the harsh rule of Spainâs inept representatives and became convinced that absolute independence was necessary. In January 1817 San MartĂnâs well-drilled army, with OâHiggins as one of its commanders, began its march across the Andes, and on February 12, 1817, the patriot forces defeated the royalists on the hill of Chacabuco, which opened the way to Santiago. OâHiggins was proclaimed supreme director of Chile, although the act of declaring Chileâs independence was not taken until a year later (February 12, 1818), on the first anniversary of Chacabuco, and the decisive defeat of Spain on the Chilean mainland (Spain held the island of ChiloĂ© until 1826) did not come until the Battle of MaipĂș, on April 5, 1818. Before emancipation was assured, OâHiggins began the creation of the Chilean navy, which by late 1818 was in the process of clearing the Chilean coast of Spanish vessels.
Chile was free, but its inherent weaknesses were everywhere manifest. The Creoles remained bitterly divided between OâHiggins and the Carreras. Two of the Carrera brothers had been executed in Mendoza, Argentina, in 1818, and JosĂ© Miguel Carrera suffered the same fate in the same city in 1821. The elite groups were dedicated to the retention of those institutions on which such things as law, property, family, and religion were founded. The masses, who had been little more than spectators in the conflicts between 1810 and 1818, were excluded from government.
Chile from 1818 to 1920
The Chilean oligarchy had little sympathy with OâHiggins, who favored reducing their privileges. They accepted him, however, because he was supported by the army and because of dangers posed by Spaniards still in Peru and in parts of Chile (Valdivia and the island of ChiloĂ©) and by internal guerrillas loyal to the Spanish monarchy. Opposition to OâHiggins began to make itself heard once the Chilean-Argentine army expelled the Spaniards from Peru; it increased after 1822, when the Chileans succeeded in driving the remaining Spaniards from Chile. OâHigginsâs attempt, by means of a new constitution, to concede a larger political role to the oligarchy did not increase his support, and general unrest and poor harvests forced him to abdicate in 1823.
The years 1823â30 were troubled by an internal political split between the oligarchy and the army; 30 successive governments held office, and a variety of political experiments were tried. Rivalries developed between federalists and centralizers and between authoritarians and liberals. To the political chaos were added financial and economic disorder and an increase in lawlessness that tended to strengthen the authoritarian members of the oligarchy. Rival political factions were eliminated in 1829 when authoritarians, with the help of a part of the army, were able to install a junta (collegial government) that nominated JosĂ© TomĂĄs de Ovalle as provisory president. Actual power, however, was held by Diego Portales, who, as either a cabinet member or a private citizen, in fact ruled as a virtual dictator.
The conservative hegemony, 1830â61
During the next 30 years, Chile established its own definitive organization, made possible by a compromise among the members of the oligarchy. Portales played an important role in the compromise, and a new constitution achieved as a result (1833) remained the basis of Chilean political life until 1925. It created a strong central government, responsive to the influence of the landowning class, which controlled the parliament.
The establishment of this new political structure united the different factions that brought Ovalle and later JoaquĂn Prieto to power. The new government was strengthened by a successful war against the Peruvian-Bolivian Confederation (1836â39), during which it broadened its support by reinstating army officers ousted when the conservatives had seized power in 1829â30.
Economic prosperity
The government of Prieto and the succeeding governments of Manuel Bulnes and of Manuel Montt dedicated themselves to developing the economy. Their first and most pressing need was to reestablish the state finances, exhausted by the war. To this end, measures were taken to expand the principal source of state incomeâforeign trade. A free port was created at ValparaĂso to encourage trade by foreign, especially British, merchants. These measures, however, would not have worked if Chilean products had not found new markets abroad. The discovery of gold in California (1848) and in Australia (1853) assured Chilean grain a vast market as the populations of those two areas expanded. The production of silver and copper increased in response to European demand, thereby increasing the wealth of the state and the dominant class. The economic development helped overcome political disagreements and aided the consolidation of internal peace.
Political stability and economic prosperity opened the way to modernization: the construction of the first railroads began, new roads were opened, and the harbors were improved. The government tried also to develop education, though largely for upper-class children. The University of Chile was founded, and foreign scholars were recruited to foster geologic, botanical, and economic studies. The development of commerce attracted numerous foreign entrepreneurs (British, French, and North American), who came to dominate the import-export trade.
Political diversification
The increase of wealth that especially favored the oligarchy and foreign merchants also contributed to a diversification of the ruling class; the development of mining production in the north and of agriculture in the south created new fortunes, whose owners soon made their entry into the political world. An attempted coup dâĂ©tat, the ârevolution of 1851,â failed but was an indication of the political awakening of these new elements. A new development among younger members of the traditional oligarchy was the growth of liberalism and the appearance of political clubs about the middle of the century.
The impact of these forces was felt inside the political establishment, so much so that a minor conflict between the state and the church over the right to make ecclesiastical appointments was sufficient to break the unity of the dominant political class. The oligarchy was divided into two groups: conservatives, who defended the traditional privileges of the church; and nationalists, who maintained the supremacy of the state. A part of each group, dissatisfied by the authoritarian government of President Montt, united and created a separate faction, the liberals.
The widening of liberal influence, 1861â91
The period after 1860, known as the âLiberal Republic,â saw the emergence of many rival political groups whose common characteristicâfollowing an unsuccessful armed insurrection by radicals in 1859âwas an attempt to gain power by peaceful means.
Political factions
After 1855 the conservative element, supporting the hegemony of the church, had allied with the liberals in opposing President Montt. The radicals joined the alliance against Montt. JosĂ© JoaquĂn PĂ©rez (1861â71), though elected with the support of the ânationalists,â governed with the help of the liberal-conservative alliance. A division in the dominating political classes occurred about 1872, when the liberals started to draw away from the conservatives; the liberals succeeded in ending the Roman Catholic Churchâs monopoly in religious matters.
European influences
The fight to secularize the state opened the country to European influences in cultural activities and civil reforms. Young members of the economic and political oligarchy began to travel and study in Europe. They brought back many political, literary, and scientific ideas.
This new political and cultural opening toward Europe was linked to closer economic relations, especially with Great Britain, Chileâs main trading partner. The British began to invest directly in Chile, supplying the capital needed to bring about the construction of railroads and the modernization of ports and public services. The increase of imports and the payment of interest from loans aggravated an already weak balance of payments and resulted in a continuing devaluation of the Chilean peso in relation to the British pound sterling.
The War of the Pacific (1879â83)
The need to improve its balance of payments attracted Chile to saltpeter mines situated along the Chilean border in the Bolivian province of Antofagasta and in the Peruvian provinces of TarapacĂĄ and Arica. Ill-defined borders and oppressive measures allegedly taken against the Chilean migrant population in these territories furnished Chile with a pretext for invasion. Chile defeated the Peruvian-Bolivian army and annexed these provinces.
The War of the Pacific had broad repercussions. France, Germany, and especially Britain had strong interests in the saltpeter mines, and they threatened to intervene. The United States, hoping to restrict European influence, offered to resolve the conflict by mediation; Chile refused the U.S. offer, fearing that it would have to give up its territorial gains. German support of the Chilean position further impeded European intervention.
The war weakened Chilean finances, and the economic situation continued to worsen. During the presidency of JosĂ© Manuel Balmaceda (1886â91) the government tried to claim the revenues from the saltpeter mines and thus to assert major responsibility in economic matters. Nearly all of the oligarchy, however, was looking for a weaker, rather than a stronger, central power and objected to this attempt to strengthen the executive. The clash was resolved in a brief civil war, which ended with Balmacedaâs abdication of the presidency.
Political development, 1891â1920
The coalition that overthrew Balmaceda resulted from a large political regrouping of all those who wanted to strengthen the parliament; thus, after the civil war Chileâs presidential republic was converted into a parliamentary republic. This meant that the oligarchy, which had extended itself into commerce and banking, needed only to assure itself of control of parliamentâand thus of the various ministriesâto dominate the political life of the country. In order to remain in office, governments now had to have the confidence of the parliament. What emerged was a continual struggle for power among the factions, which began to organize themselves as real political parties.
Growth of the middle and lower classes
The period between 1891 and 1920 was one of intense political activity that saw the formation of new political parties and tendencies that tried to express the political desires of the middle and lower classes. The development of a state bureaucracy and the growth of the railroads and of commerce favored the formation of social groups with urban concerns, rarely linked to the landed oligarchy, and increasingly aware of their possible political roles.
An active working class developed in the saltpeter mines, in the large public utility enterprises (railways, gas, electricity), and in the many factories that began to appear in the urban centers, especially in Santiago. The first strikes to obtain better salaries and working conditions occurred during this period.
Formation of new political parties
The radical political factionâborn as a dissenting wing of the liberals and striving toward the secularization of the countryâbecame the Radical Party in 1888 and tended progressively to voice the concerns of the growing middle class.
The Democratic Party (Partido DemocrĂĄtico; formed 1887) was led by MalaquĂas Concha, who spoke for the needs of the artisans and a part of the urban workers. Founded by former radicals, this party differed from the Radical Party only in the particular emphasis it gave to the labor movement.
Marxist ideology had begun to spread among Chilean workers. The first socialist group, founded in 1897, advocated anarchism and a worker-controlled economy. It became the Socialist Party in 1901 but had a fleeting life. The increase of strikes and dissatisfaction of the miners, however, led to the formation (1912) in the mining region of a new Workerâs Socialist Party (Partido Obrero Socialista), which influenced workers and university students and advocated an international class struggle; it became the Communist Party in 1922.
Decline of the ruling class
The radicalization of the parties of the left was caused largely by the ruling classâs neglect of Chileâs complex economic and social problems. The ruling class, concerned with protecting its own interests, failed to introduce needed reforms, and as a result the political instability already evident in the late 19th century grew worse. The traditional Liberal and Conservative parties were unable to adapt to the countryâs changing situation.
Along with the growing political and social problems, the economic situation also worsened. Loans obtained from Britain and, after 1916, from the United States served more to pay the interest on previous debts and to cover state expenses than to allow productive investments. The country consumed more than it produced, and this was translated into an annual inflation rate of more than 10 percent and to the constant devaluation of the currency in relation to the pound sterling and the dollar. Agrarian production barely kept pace with home consumption, but the large landowners were unable to introduce techniques to increase it. Industrial development lagged because of insufficient capital.


" height="20" alt="HEW Logo">







