- Key People:
- Inoue Kaoru
- Aristotle
- Gaetano Mosca
- Robert Michels
oligarchy
-
What is an oligarchy?
An oligarchy is a government in which a small group exercises despotic power for corrupt or selfish purposes.
Classic oligarchies arise when governing elites are exclusively recruited from a ruling class distinguished by religion, wealth, kinship, or language. These elites often wield power to benefit their own class.
The idea that all governments reduce to the rule of a few is recurrent. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels believed key capitalists controlled the government throughout capitalism. Similarly, Robert Michels's iron law of oligarchy suggests that organizations, even those following democratic ideals, inevitably become ruled by an elite few.
4 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How does an oligarchy differ from a democracy?
An oligarchy is a government in which a small group exercises despotic power for corrupt or selfish purposes. Often, this group is wealthy, forming a plutocracy, where power is exercised through wealth.
In contrast, a democracy is a system where laws, policies, leadership, and major undertakings are decided directly or indirectly by the "people". Ideally, a democracy ensures effective participation, equality in voting, an informed electorate, citizen control of the agenda, and inclusion, along with fundamental rights for all members of the dēmos.
4 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Who usually holds power in an oligarchy?
In an oligarchy, power is typically held by a small, privileged group that may exercise despotic control for corrupt or selfish purposes. These oligarchs often come from a ruling caste set apart by factors such as religion, kinship, economic status, or language, and they tend to act in the interest of their own class.
Oligarchies can manifest even in nominally democratic countries, as seen in Russia and China, where economic elites and corporations can heavily influence public policy. Some political scientists even argue that the contemporary United States could be considered an oligarchy or plutocracy due to wealth inequality that allows economic elites and corporations to influence public policy.
4 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What are some advantages and disadvantages of an oligarchy?
An oligarchy is a government in which a small group exercises control for selfish or corrupt purposes.
Advantages:
* An oligarchy can be efficient because decisions are made by a small group.
* The ruling group may have unique skills or expertise.Disadvantages:
* Oligarchies are prone to corruption and can rule in their own interests.
* They often exclude the majority of the population from political participation.
* Oligarchies can be unstable due to internal power struggles.
* They may suppress dissent to maintain their grip on power.3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Can you give examples of countries or societies that have had oligarchic governments?
An oligarchy is a government in which a small group exercises despotic power for corrupt or selfish purposes. Throughout history, various countries and societies have been identified as oligarchies.
Examples:
* Russia: Since the fall of the Soviet Union, tycoons have accumulated enormous fortunes and political influence.
* China: Since embracing capitalism in the late 1970s, China has been identified as an oligarchy.
* Florence: Ruled by the Medici family, who used their wealth and patronage to dominate the city.
* Sparta: The Messenian factor determined the development of Sparta, because it forced Spartans to adjust their institutions to deal with a permanently hostile subject population.
* Italian republics: Some republics, like Venice and Florence, were described as "constitutional oligarchies" because the dēmos only included a tiny fraction of the population.7 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How can an oligarchy affect the lives of ordinary people?
An oligarchy is a government in which a small group exercises control, often for selfish purposes. This can affect ordinary people in many ways. Such elites tend to exercise power in the interests of their own class.
Historically and in modern times, oligarchies can lead to great inequality of wealth and income, causing economic elites and corporations to influence public policy to their advantage, potentially against the preferences of the majority of ordinary citizens. Critics may complain about governments being dominated by an oligarchy of wealthy businesspeople.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
oligarchy, government by the few, especially despotic power exercised by a small and privileged group for corrupt or selfish purposes. Oligarchies in which members of the ruling group are wealthy or exercise their power through their wealth are known as plutocracies.
Read about the rise of the Russian oligarchy in the wake of the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Aristotle used the term oligarchia to designate the rule of the few when it was exercised not by the best but by bad persons unjustly. In this sense, oligarchy is a debased form of aristocracy, which denotes government by the few in which power is vested in the best individuals. Most classic oligarchies have resulted when governing elites were recruited exclusively from a ruling caste—a hereditary social grouping that is set apart from the rest of society by religion, kinship, economic status, prestige, or even language. Such elites tend to exercise power in the interests of their own class.
" height="20" alt="HEW Logo">
It is a recurrent idea that all forms of government are in the final analysis reducible to the rule of a few. Oligarchs will secure effective control whether the formal authority is vested in the people, a monarch, the proletariat, or a dictator. Thus, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels insisted that, throughout the history of capitalism, the key capitalists had controlled the government; they coined the dictum, “the state is the executive committee of the exploiting class.” The Italian political scientist Gaetano Mosca likewise insisted that a “ruling class” always constituted the effective oligarchic control. Vilfredo Pareto elaborated the idea in his doctrine of the “elite.” The modern tendency to analyze social patterns in terms of an elite, though greatly reinforced by Pareto’s theory, goes further back than Marx and Engels, who employed elite to describe the class-conscious communists, the leading group within the proletariat.
One of the most famous modern uses of the term oligarchy occurs in “iron law of oligarchy,” a concept devised by the German sociologist Robert Michels to refer to the allegedly inevitable tendency of political parties and trade unions to become bureaucratized, centralized, and conservative. His reasoning was that, no matter how egalitarian or even radical the original ideology and goals of a party or union may be, there must emerge a limited group of leaders at the centre who can direct power efficiently, get things done through an administrative staff, and evolve some kind of rigorous order and ideology to ensure the survival of the organization when faced by internal division and external opposition. Subsequent writers of various persuasions have attempted either to expand on Michels’s thesis, extending it to legislatures, religious orders, and other organizations, or to restrict or criticize the thesis, charging that the iron law of oligarchy is not universal and that some unions and parties do maintain a viable system of democratic expression and governance.
Political science and sociology have differentiated more carefully between various types of control and power. The type of power held by a party boss in a democracy, while overwhelming in relation to any single member of the party, is very different from that wielded by the boss of the single party in a totalitarian or authoritarian system. Likewise, the controlling group within an organization does not occupy the same position under democratic conditions (which allows for effective challenges to the group by outsiders at regular intervals) as it does under an authoritarian plan. If effective control changes hands as rapidly as it does in a city of the United States or a British trade union, it is doubtful that those exercising it should be spoken of as a “class” or an “elite.” The expression “the few” is too abstract to convey much information.
Despite the spread of democracy in the 20th century, oligarchies continued to exist, including in countries that were nominally democratic in form. Among industrialized countries that have been identified as oligarchies are Russia since the fall of the Soviet Union and China since that country’s embrace of capitalism in the late 1970s. Some political scientists have argued that the contemporary United States is an oligarchy or a plutocracy, because its great inequality of wealth and income (as compared with other industrialized countries) enables economic elites and corporations to influence public policy to their advantage, often against the preferences of the majority of ordinary citizens.
The trusted destination for professionals, college students, and lifelong learners.
SUBSCRIBE
