banana republic
-
What is a banana republic?
A banana republic is a derogatory term for an unstable country whose economy depends on exporting a single product or commodity. These countries are typically controlled by foreign-owned companies or industries and feature a small ruling class that controls wealth and resources.
Banana republics often have weak governance structures, leading to widespread corruption. Poverty is common, and the government or upper class controls all resources, resulting in high social and economic inequality. Lower classes are marginalized, making these republics prone to civil unrest, insurgencies, or coups. The term originated in the late 19th century with American corporations exploiting land and workers for banana plantations in Central and South America.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Why is the term 'banana republic' used to describe certain countries?
The term "banana republic" is a derogatory label for a country with an economy dependent on exporting a single product or commodity, often controlled by foreign-owned entities. These nations typically exhibit a highly stratified socioeconomic structure, where a small ruling class controls wealth and resources, leading to political instability and widespread corruption.
Coined by American author O. Henry in 1901, the term originates from the exploitation of land and workers in Central and South America by American corporations developing banana plantations in the late 19th century. These corporations, like the United Fruit Company, exerted significant influence over these countries, sometimes even orchestrating coups to install favorable governments. Today, "banana republic" describes scenarios of corruption, repression, and failures to control executive power.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What kind of government does a banana republic usually have?
A banana republic typically has weak governmental structures, leading to widespread corruption among officials. Often, a small upper class or foreign entities control the resources. Elections, if held, are usually rigged or feature only one candidate.
Social and economic inequality is high, with marginalized lower classes, making these republics prone to civil unrest, insurgencies, or coups. Thus, these countries are not true republics, as citizens lack sovereignty and control over the state through representatives. The state operates like a private commercial enterprise to generate profits, arguably a form of state capitalism.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How do powerful companies influence banana republic governments?
Powerful companies influence banana republic governments through economic and political leverage. These countries, reliant on a single export like bananas, are often controlled by foreign entities. Corporations exploit land and workers, fostering a highly stratified society where a small elite controls the wealth.
Historically, companies like United Fruit exerted control by orchestrating coups, backing pro-business leaders, and suppressing worker strikes. They could pressure governments by threatening to cut off trade. This led to political instability, economic stagnation, and an increase in foreign debt, further empowering the corporations. Such dominance undermines national sovereignty, turning the state into a commercial enterprise.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What are some problems people face in a banana republic government?
A banana republic is characterized by a government with weak structures, leading to widespread corruption among officials. These nations are typically controlled by foreign-owned companies due to their economic dependence on a single export.
Poverty is widespread, and a small upper class or the government controls all resources, resulting in high social and economic inequality. Lower classes often face marginalization or oppression, making banana republics prone to civil unrest, insurgencies, or coups. Elections are often rigged or feature only one candidate, denying citizens true sovereignty.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How has the idea of a banana republic been used to discuss politics and economics in history?
The term "banana republic" refers to a country with an economy dependent on a single export, often controlled by foreign entities, and characterized by socioeconomic stratification and political instability.
Coined by O. Henry in 1901, the term reflects American corporations' exploitation of Central and South America through banana plantations. In Honduras, the Cuyamel Fruit Company orchestrated a coup in 1911 to install a government favorable to foreign businesses. Similarly, in Guatemala, the United Fruit Company influenced the U.S. government to overthrow a democratically elected president in 1954 due to his reform policies. Even without direct control, the United Fruit Company influenced Colombia, leading to the 1928 Banana Massacre of striking workers.
Today, "banana republic" describes corruption, repression, and failures in executive power control. The term is used by politicians and political commentators to describe scenarios of corruption, repression, and failures to control executive power.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
banana republic, derogatory term for a country that has an economy dependent solely on revenue from exporting a single product or commodity. As a result, such countries are typically controlled by foreign-owned companies or industries. Banana republics usually have a highly stratified socioeconomic structure, with a small ruling class that controls access to wealth and resources, and are politically unstable. The term has its origins in the development of banana plantations by American corporations and their exploitation of land and workers in Central and South America beginning in the late 19th century.
Characteristics
A country labeled a banana republic has many distinguishing features. It has weak structures of governance, which often results in widespread corruption among government officials. Poverty is common, and the government, or a very small upper class, controls all resources. Measures of social and economic inequality are therefore typically high. People in lower classes are usually marginalized or oppressed, and so banana republics are prone to civil unrest or even frequent insurgencies or coup attempts. The (typically) foreign corporations and other entities that own the countryâs infrastructure ultimately hold primary control. Thus, a banana republic is not a republic in the true sense, because its citizens have no sovereignty and cannot control the state through representatives. A banana republic can be considered, arguably, a form of state capitalism, because the country is operated by the state like a private commercial enterprise to generate monetary profits. Elections may happen, but they are usually rigged or run with a single candidate. Today the term banana republic is used by politicians and political commentators to describe scenarios of corruption, repression, and failures to control executive power.
Origins of the term
The term banana republic was coined by the American author O. Henry in 1901, in a short story later adapted for use in his first book, Cabbages and Kings (1904). Henry describes a fictional country called Anchuriaââthis small, maritime banana republic,â as the book saysâwhich is based on his experiences in Honduras, where he lived for several months during the 1890s. But the deeper origin of the concept of a banana republic goes back to 1870, when Lorenzo Dow Baker introduced bananas that he bought in Jamaica to the United States, creating a demand for the fruit through marketing. The United Fruit Company took over a major proportion of this market. At the turn of the 20th century, United Fruit Company had banana plantations in many Central and South American countries.
History of banana republics
In Honduras the American-owned Cuyamel Fruit Company bought land for banana plantations in 1910. Banana fruit production was at the time dominated by the United Fruit Company, which was exporting bananas to the United States. In 1911 Cuyamelâs founder, Samuel Zemurray, orchestrated a coup dâĂ©tat with the help of mercenary Lee Christmas. The coup replaced the Honduran government with a military government headed by Manuel Bonilla, who gave concessions to foreign businesses, which in turn acted as de facto rulers of the country. The resulting political instability led to economic stagnation; Hondurasâs foreign debt grew, which further undermined Bonillaâs puppet government and gave the corporations more power. In 1933 Zemurray dissolved Cuyamel and took control of United Fruit, which then became the largest employer in Honduras until reforms in the 1940s.
A similar sequence of events unfolded in Guatemala, where United Fruit played on the U.S. governmentâs fears of communism during the 1950s. Democratically elected as the president of Guatemala, Jacobo Arbenz focused on major social reforms, which included nationalizing uncultivated land and distributing it to landless workers for cultivation, when he began his presidency in 1951. These reforms were significant threats to United Fruit. Arbenz, who was attacked as a communist sympathizer, was ousted in 1954 by a CIA-led coup called Operation Success and replaced with a pro-business leader. The Guatemalan government continued to be run by a series of U.S.-backed military rulers during a civil war that lasted from 1960 to 1996. Although democratically elected governments returned after 1996, economic inequality that has its roots in the United Fruit era continues into the 21st century in Guatemala, where more than half the population lives in poverty.
The United Fruit Company operated in Colombia too, and, while it did not overtly control the government as in Honduras and Guatemala, its ability to cut off Colombian trade with the United States gave the company significant leverage over the Colombian government. This leverage was put to use in 1928, when United Fruit workers started a strike for better working conditions. The company refused to negotiate with the workers and organized the deployment of the Colombian army against them, resulting in what became known as the Banana Massacre. (This massacre became more widely known through Colombian author Gabriel GarcĂa MĂĄrquezâs depiction of it in One Hundred Years of Solitude [1967]. In the novel the arrival of an American banana company in the fictional town of Macondo leads to the killings of banana plantation workers and the economic downfall of Macondo.)
In another case of foreign fruit companies dominating local politics, King Kalakaua was forced to sign, in 1887, the Constitution of the Kingdom of Hawaii. This document, called the Bayonet Constitution because it was signed under threat of violence, was drafted by white businessmen affiliated with pineapple and sugar plantations. The constitution stripped the king of most of his powers while also disenfranchising most indigenous Hawaiian voters. When his successor, Queen Liliuokalani, seemed as if she would abrogate that constitution, the Committee of Safety, a group of American and European businessmen, seized power in 1893, with the help of a company of U.S. marines. A short-lived ârepublic,â which was in fact an oligarchy controlled by some of the same American and European businessmen, ensued until the administration of U.S. Pres. William McKinley annexed the islands as U.S. territory in 1900.
The Chilean poet Pablo Neruda wrote about the corporate dominance of Latin American countries in âUnited Fruit Co.,â from his epic poem Canto general (1950):
The United Fruit Company
reserved for itself the most juicy
piece, the central coast of my world,
the delicate waist of America.
It rebaptized these countries
Banana RepublicsâŠ.
In the 21st century, fruit and chemical companies such as Chiquita (United Fruit renamed itself Chiquita in 1990), Del Monte, Dow Chemical, Occidental Chemical, and Shell continue to fight litigation being pursued by farmers from Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, and Panama who argue that the companiesâ use of the pesticide dibromochloropropane (DBCP) from the 1960s to the 1980s caused their health problems, including sterility, birth defects, and an elevated risk of cancer.


" height="20" alt="HEW Logo">

