
Miranda is an award-winning freelancer who has covered various financial markets and topics since 2006. In addition to writing about personal finance, investing, college planning, student loans, insurance, and other money-related topics, Miranda is an avid podcaster and co-hosts the Money Talks News podcast.
David Schepp is a veteran financial journalist with more than two decades of experience in financial news editing and reporting for print, digital, and multimedia publications.

When we talk about the gender pay gap, one thing that sometimes gets overlooked is how it affects women later in life. Women are more likely than men to live in poverty during what should be their golden years. And ironically, the general longevity that women experience doesnât help.
Itâs an enduring and disturbing fact that many women experience higher poverty rates than men as they live out their retirement years. In 1998, a report by the Social Security Administration (SSA) showed the poverty rate for elderly women was 13%âcompared with 7% for men. In 2016, a National Institute on Retirement Security study found that women 65 and older were 80% more likely than men of the same age to be impoverished. And in 2022, a United Nations policy brief noted that the percentage of elderly women living in poverty had changed little.
These reports, which span nearly a quarter century, point to several consistent reasons why women have an increased likelihood of struggling financially in retirement:
Even after making some gains in income and workforce representation before 2019, women experienced a setback with the onset of COVID-19. Women faced steeper job losses during the pandemic and a slower recovery, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, putting them firmly back on track to maintain the status quo of poverty in retirement.
The issue of higher rates of poverty in retirement doesnât cut only along gender lines. People of color and those who identify as LGBTQ+ are also more likely to be poorer than straight white men.
One way that some women are hoping to build more wealth and a better retirement is to opt out of having childrenâa decision that isnât universally accepted, appealing, or possible and doesnât come without societal costs. A 2023 Pew Research Center survey found that only 45% of childless women hoped to have children somedayâcompared with 57% of childless men.
Some of the reasons why people are opting out of having children include:
Those who choose to remain child-free may avoid the âmotherhood penaltyâ at work, but society as a whole might prefer to enact policy and cultural change rather than let the burden of providing for retirement rest on such a personal decision.
Itâs unlikely that the issue of women and retirement poverty will be solved systemically anytime soon, so mitigating the effects requires personal intervention. Consider these strategies:
Itâs possible for stay-at-home spouses and those who work part-time to build their retirement accounts through spousal contributions to an IRA. A working spouse can contribute to a nonworking spouseâs IRAâthose assets are in the name of the stay-at-home spouse.
Despite decades of research seeking to address the issue, women remain in poverty at higher rates, largely due to policy choices and biological issues of longevity. In this environment, women need to consider how to best shore up their finances and prepare to care for themselves. As Clare Boothe Luce said, âA womanâs best protection is a little money of her own.â
If youâre among the women wondering what the future holds moneywise, take steps to plan for a more financially secure retirement.
This article is intended for educational purposes only. EncyclopĂŠdia Britannica, Inc., does not provide legal, tax, or investment advice.