social group
-
What is a social group?
A social group involves any number of humans who are, have recently been, or expect to be in some form of interaction. These groups can range in size from a pair to a large nation-state.
American sociologist C.H. Cooley distinguished between primary and secondary groups. Primary groups have direct, face-to-face, and intimate relationships, like family or close friends. Secondary groups involve formal ties, such as those in a work environment.
Social groups influence identity and behavior, as people seek positive traits within their groups while sometimes downplaying positive aspects of outside groups. Social interactions within these groups can be characterized by mutual benefit, altruism, selfishness, or spite.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How do people become part of a social group?
People become part of a social group through psychological processes, such as social categorization, which is perceiving themselves and others as interchangeable group members instead of unique individuals. Social comparison helps determine a group's value or social standing, while social identification involves relating to others and viewing individuals and groups.
Social identity is gained from knowing and valuing membership in certain social groups. People may also adapt their behaviors and attitudes to those of a reference group, which can be a group they aspire to join or one that influences their values.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What are some examples of social groups?
A social group involves people who are, have recently been, or expect to be in some kind of relationship with one another.
Examples of social groups include:
* Primary groups Direct, face-to-face, and intimate relations like family or close friends.
* Secondary groups Associations, such as work groups, where relationships are more formal.
* In-groups Groups with which one feels a sense of solidarity and community.
* Out-groups Groups seen as distinct from one's own, sometimes evoking dislike or hostility.2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How do social groups influence people's behavior?
Social groups significantly influence individual behavior through various mechanisms. Social identity theory suggests that people maintain a positive image of their groups, favoring in-group members and sometimes developing prejudices against out-groups. This inclination affects resource distribution, evaluations, and assessments of achievements.
People conform to group pressure to gain accurate perceptions of reality and to be accepted. The desire for agreement motivates individuals to align with group norms, especially when uncertain or dependent on the group for information. However, groupthink, a mode of thinking in cohesive groups, can lead to accepting viewpoints without critical evaluation, reducing problem-solving efficiency. To prevent groupthink, it is important to introduce channels for dissent and preserve the groupâs openness.
6 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What is the difference between a primary group and a secondary group?
Social groups are any collections of people who are, have recently been, or expect to be in some form of interaction with one another.
Primary Group
A primary group is typically small, characterized by direct, intimate, and relatively long-lasting relationships. Examples include family or a close circle of friends. Primary groups exert a strong influence on the attitudes and ideals of individuals.
Secondary Group
A secondary group is any other type of group, especially work or task-oriented associations, in which relationships are maintained through formal or contractual ties.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How do social groups affect society as a whole?
Social groups significantly influence society by establishing norms and shaping individual behaviors. Social identity theory suggests that people seek positive traits within their groups, which can lead to in-group favoritism and sometimes negative perceptions of out-groups. This inclination affects resource distribution, evaluations, and assessments of performance between groups.
Social structures within these groups evolve from simple to complex, dividing along lines such as labor, sex, and age. Social movements may arise from these divisions because of normative strains, value conflicts, and structural changes, potentially leading to societal manipulation. Social change occurs as new social movements form and challenge established rules. Conformity within groups is also affected by social identity, where agreement with in-group members is more influential.
9 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
social group, any set of human beings who either are, recently have been, or anticipate being in some kind of interrelation. The term group, or social group, has been used to designate many kinds of aggregations of humans. Aggregations of two members and aggregations that include the total population of a large nation-state have been called groups.
One of the earliest and best-known classifications of groups was the American sociologist C.H. Cooleyâs distinction between primary and secondary groups, set forth in his Human Nature and the Social Order (1902). âPrimary groupâ refers to those personal relations that are direct, face-to-face, relatively permanent, and intimate, such as the relations in a family, a group of close friends, and the like. âSecondary groupâ (an expression that Cooley himself did not actually use but that emerged later) refers to all other person-to-person relations but especially to those groups or associations, such as work groups, in which the individual is related to others through formal, often legalistic or contractual ties. Cooley felt that primary groups were the fundamental agencies through which the individualâs character or personality was formed. American sociologist Talcott Parsons distinguished five factors that differentiate primary groups from secondary groups: relations between members of primary groups, as contrasted with secondary groups, tend to be (1) diffuse, rather than specific or delimited, (2) particularistic, rather than universalistic, (3) ascription-based (i.e., based on who or what you are), rather than achievement-based (i.e., based on what you do or have done), (4) other-oriented or group-oriented, rather than self-oriented, (5) affective or emotion-laden, rather than emotionally neutral. Secondary groups are those in which relations between members tend to fit the opposite poles of the five factors.
Historically, many other pairs of terms have been used to classify groups. The German sociologist Ferdinand Tönnies coined the now-famous distinction between Gemeinschaft (âcommunityâ) and Gesellschaft (âsociety,â or âassociationâ), which for all practical purposes reflect the same distinction as that between primary and secondary. The American anthropologist Robert Redfield distinguished between folk society and urban society. The English jurist Sir Henry Maine talked of societies of status and societies of contract. All of these categories are virtually coterminous with the primary-groupâsecondary-group distinction. There is also a close correspondence between these pairs of terms and the distinction between mechanical solidarity and organic solidarity, which was emphasized by the French sociologist Ămile Durkheim.
" height="20" alt="HEW Logo">
Still other sets of terms are used, not as bases for distinguishing types of groups but as bases for describing the individualâs relationship to different groups. Thus, the terms we-group and they-group, as well as the terms in-group and out-group, are used in order to contrast a group of which the referent, or focal person, is a member (often, a primary-type group) and some other groupânot necessarily different in kindâof which the focal person (and other members of his in-group, or we-group) is not a member and toward which he feels some degree of animosity or negative affect.
Another set of distinctions based on the individualâs relationship to the group is expressed by the terms membership group and reference group. The former has the obvious meaning of a group of which the individual is a member, here and now, by reason of one characteristic or another (such as being a member of a particular family or a member of the sixth-grade class in Jefferson School). The term reference group has been used in two ways, to mean either a group for which the individual aspires to membership or a group whose values, norms, and attitudes serve as points of reference for the individual. In either case, the crucial feature is that the individual adapts his attitudes and behaviour to model those of the members of the reference group. Obviously, membership groups and reference groups are not mutually exclusive.
The term group, or social group, has been used to refer to very divergent kinds of aggregations of people. Indeed, the term has been used so broadly as to threaten its fruitfulness as a focal concept. For one thing, the word group has sometimes been used to designate the members of a social category based on possession of a common attribute, even when the members have no meaningful degree of interrelation. Thus, it has been used to refer to such collections as persons of a particular age, all persons having similar incomes or occupations, and all persons with similar reading habits. These are what might be called statistical groups, as distinct from actual groups, the latter being characterized by interrelatedness of the members.
Virtually all efforts to classify social groups result in a certain degree of artificiality. Because of these and other problems of definition and classification, sociologists have attempted to distinguish between various kinds of social aggregates, some to be considered groups and others to be identified by other termsâaudiences, publics, and the like; there is, however, no generally accepted classification at this time.
The trusted destination for professionals, college students, and lifelong learners.
SUBSCRIBE
