conformity
-
What is conformity in society?
Conformity in society is when individuals adjust their beliefs, attitudes, actions, or perceptions to align with those of a group they belong to, want to belong to, or seek approval from. This can manifest as public agreement (compliance) or private agreement (acceptance). People conform to gain an accurate perception of reality and to be accepted by others. The opposite of conformity includes independence, where one stands firm despite group pressure, and anticonformity, where one moves further away from the group's position.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Why do people tend to conform to groups?
People conform to groups because they rely on the group to fulfill their desires to accurately perceive reality and to gain acceptance.
People seek accurate beliefs because these often lead to beneficial outcomes. While some beliefs can be verified objectively, others rely on social tests, where individuals compare their beliefs to those of respected others. Agreement boosts confidence, while disagreement diminishes it, motivating people to align with group norms to avoid discomfort. This alignment can result from informational influence, especially when people are uncertain and believe the group is more informed. Norms, whether internalized or enforced, also play a key role in guiding behavior within social groups.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What are some examples of conformity in everyday life?
Conformity involves adjusting beliefs, attitudes, or behaviors to align with a group's norms. This can stem from wanting to be accurate or to be accepted.
Examples of conformity:
* Adhering to fashion trends illustrates balancing individuality with group belonging.
* Following traffic laws demonstrates conformity to ensure safety and social order.
* Students raising their hands in class to speak shows conforming to classroom etiquette.
* Queuing in line at a store shows conformity to social norms of fairness.
* Participating in cultural or religious traditions illustrates conformity to shared values and practices.4 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How can peer pressure influence conformity among teenagers?
Peer pressure can significantly influence conformity among teenagers, as they navigate the desire for social acceptance and fear of rejection. This pressure often leads to public compliance with group norms, even if it doesn't result in private acceptance.
Teenagers often depend on their peer group for support, security, and guidance during this transitional time, as they may believe that only others experiencing the same things can truly understand them. The need to be liked and respected by peers can drive teens to adopt similar behaviors, sometimes leading to both positive and negative outcomes. Those who aren't accepted by their peers may face numerous risks, including delinquency and dropping out of school.
5 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What are the positive and negative effects of conformity on society?
Conformity occurs when individuals alter their beliefs or actions to align with those of a group they belong to, desire to belong to, or seek approval from.
Positive Effects
- Accuracy People conform because they want to hold accurate beliefs about the world.
- Social Harmony Conformity can promote social harmony and cooperation within a group.
- Group Goals It reinforces group boundaries, distinctiveness, and cohesiveness, which helps the group move towards particular goals.
- Confidence In certain contexts, conformity may enhance membersā confidence and speed up decision-making processes.
Negative Effects
- Groupthink The desire for group consensus can lead to groupthink, where dissenting opinions are suppressed, and poor decisions are made.
- Loss of Individuality Over-conformity can stifle individual expression and critical thinking.
- Ethical Issues An unquestioned belief in the morality of the group and its choices may lead to stereotyping relevant opponents.
- Biased decisions Decision making affected by groupthink neglects possible alternatives, focuses on a narrow number of goals, and ignores the risks involved in a particular decision.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How do cultures or societies differ in their expectations of conformity?
Different cultures and societies vary significantly in their expectations of conformity, influenced by the degree to which they value individualism versus collectivism.
In individualistic cultures, such as those in many Western countries, independence, autonomy, and self-reliance are emphasized, leading to lower expectations of conformity. People are encouraged to express their unique opinions and behaviors, and nonconformity is often tolerated or even celebrated.
Conversely, collectivist cultures prioritize interdependence, cooperation, and social harmony. In these societies, there is a greater emphasis on conforming to group norms and expectations, as maintaining social cohesion is highly valued. Individuals in collectivist cultures may be more concerned about how their behavior is perceived by others and are more likely to prioritize collective goals over individual desires.
5 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
conformity, the process whereby people change their beliefs, attitudes, actions, or perceptions to more closely match those held by groups to which they belong or want to belong or by groups whose approval they desire. Conformity has important social implications and continues to be actively researched.
Classic studies
Two lines of research have had a great impact on views of conformity. In one set of studies (1935), the Turkish-born social psychologist Muzafer Sherif demonstrated the power of social influence to change peopleās perceptions of highly ambiguous stimuli. Sherif made use of the autokinetic effect, a perceptual illusion that occurs when people are asked to concentrate on a stationary point of light in a dark room. Under those circumstances, people perceive movement in the light. Some think it moves only a little; others think it moves a lot.
Sherif found that when groups of three people were brought together and asked to say out loud how far a light moved, their judgments gradually converged. In other words, they developed a group norm about the distance the light moved. And that norm had a lasting impact on participantsā perceptions. Conformity to the group norm was still evident a year later. Participants created a norm through mutual social influence, which then influenced their private responses.
" height="20" alt="HEW Logo">
In another series of experiments, the American psychologist Solomon Asch assembled groups of seven to nine people for a study on visual perception. The experimental task, which involved matching the length of a standard line against three comparison lines, was easy. Each group contained one naive participant who answered next to last. The remaining āmembersā were confederates of the experimenter and gave unanimously incorrect answers on 12 of 18 trials.
Asch found that conformity occurred even in a situation where the majority gave clearly erroneous answers. Participantsā responses agreed with the erroneous majority approximately one-third of the time, and 27 percent of participants conformed on at least eight trials. Control participants (who made judgments privately) gave incorrect answers less than 1 percent of the time. Although the level of conformity that Asch obtained may seem surprising, it is worth noting that participantsā responses were correct approximately two-thirds of the time, and 24 percent of participants never conformed.
Types of conformity
Two categories of conformity have been distinguished: public agreement (compliance) and private agreement (acceptance). If conformity is defined as movement toward a group norm, then compliance refers to overt behavioral change in the direction of that norm, whereas acceptance refers to covert attitudinal or perceptual change. For example, if an individual initially refused to sign a petition advocating abortion rights, learned that a group advocated those rights, and then signed a petition favouring those rights, the person would be showing compliance. In contrast, if an individual privately believed that abortion should be outlawed, learned that a group advocated abortion rights, and then changed his private opinion about those rights, the person would be showing acceptance.
Several forms of nonconformity have been distinguished, but two of the most important are independence and anticonformity. Independence occurs when a person initially disagrees with a group and exhibits neither compliance nor acceptance after being exposed to group pressure. In other words, the person stands fast when faced with disagreement. In contrast, anticonformity occurs when a person initially disagrees with a group and moves even farther away from its position (at the public or private level) after being exposed to pressure. (Ironically, anticonformers are just as responsive to group pressure as conformers, but they manifest their susceptibility by moving away from the group.)
The trusted destination for professionals, college students, and lifelong learners.
SUBSCRIBE
The role of motivation
People conform to group pressure because they are dependent on the group for satisfying two important desires: the desire to have an accurate perception of reality and the desire to be accepted by other people.
People want to hold accurate beliefs about the world because such beliefs usually lead to rewarding outcomes. Some beliefs about the world can be verified by using objective tests; others cannot be verified by using objective standards and hence must be verified by using social tests, namely comparing oneās beliefs to those of other people whose judgment one respects. If those others agree with oneās beliefs, one gains confidence in them; if they disagree, one loses confidence. Because disagreement is disturbing, people are motivated to eliminate it, and one way to do so is to conform to group norms.
According to that analysis, people sometimes conform to groups because they are uncertain about the correctness of their beliefs and believe the group is more likely to be correct than they are. That kind of conformity reflects what the American researchers Morton Deutsch and Harold Gerard labeled informational influence. Informational influence generally produces private acceptance as well as public compliance. This is illustrated in Sherifās work, which indicated that people judging an ambiguous stimulus exhibited both compliance (when they made judgments in othersā presence) and acceptance (when they later responded privately).
Because informational influence is based on insecurity about oneās beliefs, one would expect it to be more common when an individual feels dependent on others for information. Consistently with that assumption, people exhibit more conformity when they are working on ambiguous tasks than on unambiguous tasks. In addition, they conform more when they have doubts about their own task competence and when they think other group members are highly competent in the task.