Adding us as a Preferred Source tells Google you trust our content, so our articles show up more often in your Google Search, Discover feed, and AI Overviews.
verifiedCite
While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies.
Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions.
Select Citation Style
print
Print
Please select which sections you would like to print:
The sharia is the fundamental religious concept of Islam, representing God’s command for Muslims and a system of duties based on religious belief. Known as the sharīʿah, it is considered a divinely ordained path of conduct that guides Muslims toward religious expression in this world, with the goal of divine favor in the afterlife.
While the Qurʾān provides basic standards, it is not a comprehensive legal code. The sharia also encompasses ethical standards, indicating what one ought to do or refrain from doing, thus serving as a comprehensive code of behavior for both private and public activities.
The interpretation of the sharia has produced a wide array of legal positions, with social pressures and communal interests playing an important role in its practice.
How is sharia applied differently in various countries?
The sharia, the religious law of Islam, is viewed as God’s command for Muslims, offering a path of conduct for religious conviction and divine favor. However, the application of the sharia varies across countries.
Saudi Arabia represents one extreme. There, the sharia is the basis of justice, with judgments leaning towards the conservative Hanbali tradition, including severe punishments. At the opposite extreme, countries like Turkey (Türkiye) have fully abandoned the sharia, adopting secularist codes. Other Muslim countries have adapted traditional the sharia to meet modern needs. For example, Egypt, which typically relies on Hanafi tradition, has incorporated aspects of Maliki law to address the needs of abandoned wives or ill-treated women. The scope and administration of the sharia also differ, with some countries applying it in its entirety. Starting in the 19th century, most Muslim countries adopted Western criminal codes patterned after French, Swiss, or British systems of justice and retained the sharia primarily for matters of personal status, including family law.
What are some common misconceptions about sharia?
The sharia is often misunderstood as a rigid, uniform legal code, but it is a multifaceted concept that represents the fundamental religious law of Islam. Some misconceptions include:
Scope: Sharia is more than just law; it’s a comprehensive code of behavior that encompasses ethics, morals, and religious observances.
Interpretation: It is not immutable but subject to interpretation, resulting in diverse positions on legal matters.
Application: The sharia isn’t always applied in its traditional form and has been modified in many Muslim countries to align with modern needs.
Jurisdiction: Historically, the sharia courts have not had exclusive authority, with other courts handling criminal, land, and commercial law.
Conservatism: While some regions like Saudi Arabia adhere to conservative interpretations, the sharia is not inherently severe, and justice is based on interpretation.
How does sharia affect the daily lives of Muslims?
The sharia, or Islamic law, profoundly influences the daily lives of Muslims by providing a comprehensive code of behavior that governs both private and public activities. It is derived from the Qurʾān and the teachings of Muhammad.
Sharia duties are divided into those owed to God, such as daily prayers, almsgiving, fasting, and pilgrimage, and those owed to other human beings, including interpersonal matters. It encompasses ethical standards and legal rules, indicating what one ought to do or refrain from doing.
Family law within the sharia is based on a patriarchal outlook. The dietary laws also play a role in establishing a sense of social identity and separateness.
Is sharia law like canon law?
Both the sharia (Islamic law) and canon law provide norms for the performance of religious rituals, family relations, and some aspects of personal behavior based on the precepts of Islam and certain Christian churches, respectively. But the sharia and canon law are fundamentally different in several ways. The sharia extends to all Muslim individuals and provides a comprehensive framework for an ethical lifestyle, including grooming and dress, financial transactions, and personal etiquette. By contrast, canon law is a set of regulations that the Church (whether Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, the Anglican Communion, and other churches of Eastern Christianity) uses to govern itself, applying primarily to clergy and ecclesiastical institutions. Canon law can also impose obligations on lay members, particularly in aspects of communal worship or sacramental practice, but it generally does not advise on everyday conduct in a comprehensive way.
In some regions, including several Middle Eastern countries, the state assigns certain matters of personal status, such as family law, to recognized religious communities. In this way, public law puts the sharia and canon law on equal legal footing on matters such as marriage, divorce, and inheritance.
What are the main sources of sharia?
The main sources of the sharia (Islamic law) are the Qurʾan, Sunnah, ijmāʿ, and qiyās. The Qurʾan provides the basic standards of conduct, while the Sunnah embodies the traditions, customs, and practices of the Islamic community, based on the Prophet Muhammad’s words and actions. Ijmāʿ refers to the consensus among Muslim scholars or the Muslim community on specific matters. Qiyās involves analogical reasoning, used to derive legal principles from the Qurʾan and Sunnah.
What kinds of rules or topics does sharia cover?
The sharia in its classical form differs from Western legal systems because it governs a person’s relationships with their neighbors, the state, God, and their own conscience. It is a comprehensive code of behavior that includes both private and public activities.
Sharia duties are split into obligations to God, like daily prayers, almsgiving, fasting, and pilgrimage, and those to other people. The latter includes offenses such as homicide or assault, which are punishable by retaliation unless the victim opts for compensation instead. Fixed punishments (ḥadd) exist for specific crimes. Starting in the 19th century, most Muslim countries adopted Western criminal codes patterned after French, Swiss, or British systems of justice, although family law (marriage, divorce, inheritance) often are governed by the sharia.
The four root transactions of the sharia are sale, hire, gift, and loan, which apply to pledge, deposit, guarantee, land tenancy, and other transactions. The doctrine of ribā (usury) significantly influences the Islamic law of transactions by precluding any form of interest on a capital loan or investment. As with criminal law, most Muslim countries use financial laws based largely on Western legal models, although instruments of Islamic finance, which are subject to additional requirements under the sharia, are often recognized within these legal frameworks and those of some Western countries.
sharia, the fundamental religious concept of Islam—namely, its law. The interpretation and application of the sharia varies widely, owing to the several divergent legal traditions that developed in Islam. Its system is pluralistic, although Muslims have traditionally been expected to follow a recognized jurist or school of jurisprudence rather than pick and choose among interpretations according to personal preference. In most Muslim countries, the application of Islamic law in public life is confined to matters of family law, such as marriage, divorce, and inheritance.
The religious law of Islam is seen as the expression of God’s command for Muslims and, in application, constitutes a system of duties that are incumbent upon all Muslims by virtue of their religious belief. Known as the sharīʿah (literally, “path leading to the watering place”), the law represents a divinely ordained path of conduct that guides Muslims toward a practical expression of religious conviction in this world and the goal of divine favour in the world to come.
Nature and significance of Islamic law
In classical form, the sharia differs from Western systems of law in two principal respects. In the first place, the scope of the sharia is much wider, since it regulates the individual’s relationship not only with neighbours and with the state, which is the limit of most other legal systems, but also with God and with the individual’s own conscience. Ritual practices—such as the daily prayers (ṣalāt), almsgiving (zakāt), fasting (ṣawm), and pilgrimage (hajj)—are an integral part of sharia law and usually occupy the first chapters in legal manuals. The sharia is concerned as much with ethical standards as with legal rules, indicating not only what an individual is entitled or bound to do in law but also what one ought, in conscience, to do or to refrain from doing. Accordingly, certain acts are classified as praiseworthy (mandūb), which means that their performance brings divine favour and their omission divine disfavour, and others as blameworthy (makrūh), which has the opposite implications. However, in neither case is there any legal sanction of punishment or reward, nullity or validity. The sharia is thus not merely a system of law but also a comprehensive code of behaviour that embraces both private and public activities.
Discover how ordinary objects work, and expand your understanding of the familiar.
The second major distinction between the sharia and Western legal systems is a consequence of the Islamic concept of the law as the expression of the divine will. With the death of the Prophet Muhammad in 632, direct communication of the divine will to human beings ceased, and the terms of the divine revelation were henceforth fixed and immutable. The overall image of the sharia is thus one of unchanging continuity, an impression that generally holds true for some areas of the law, such as ritual law. However, revelation can be interpreted in varying ways, and, over time, the diversity of possible interpretations has produced a wide array of positions on almost every point of law. In the premodern period the ʿulamāʾ (Muslim religious scholars) held a monopoly over interpretation of the law, but since the 19th century their monopoly has been challenged by Westernized elites and laypeople. The question of which interpretations become normative at any given time is complex. Early Western studies of Islamic law held the view that while Islamic law shaped Muslim societies, the latter had no influence on Islamic law in return. However, this position has become untenable. Social pressures and communal interests have played an important role in determining the practice of Islamic law in particular contexts—both in the premodern period and to an even greater extent in the modern era.
Historical development of sharia law
For the first Muslim community, established under the leadership of the Prophet Muhammad at Medina in 622, the Qurʾānic revelations laid down basic standards of conduct. But the Qurʾān is in no sense a comprehensive legal code: only about 10 percent of its verses deal with legal issues. During his lifetime, Muhammad, as the supreme judge of the community, resolved legal problems as they arose by interpreting and expanding the general provisions of the Qurʾān, thereby establishing a legal tradition that was to continue after his death. With the rapid expansion of the Islamic realm under Muhammad’s political successors, the Muslim polity became administratively more complex and came into contact with the laws and institutions of the lands that the Muslims conquered. With the appointment of judges, or qadis, to the various provinces and districts, an organized judiciary came into being. The qadis were responsible for giving effect to a growing corpus of administrative and fiscal law, and they pragmatically adopted elements and institutions of Roman-Byzantine and Persian-Sasanian law into Islamic legal practice in the conquered territories. Depending on the discretion of the individual qadi, judicial decisions were based on the rules of the Qurʾān where these were relevant, but the sharp focus in which the Qurʾānic laws were held in the Medinan period was lost with the expanding horizons of activity.
Muslim jurisprudence, the science of ascertaining the precise terms of the sharia, is known as fiqh (literally, “understanding”). Beginning in the second half of the 8th century, oral transmission and development of this science gave way to a written legal literature devoted to exploring the substance of the law and the proper methodology for its derivation and justification. Throughout the medieval period the basic doctrine was elaborated and systematized in a large number of commentaries, and the voluminous literature thus produced constitutes the traditional textual authority of sharia law.