What is the ethics of care?

The ethics of care is a feminist philosophical perspective that uses a relational and context-bound approach toward morality and decision making. It contrasts with ethical theories that rely on principles to highlight moral actions, such as Kantian deontology, utilitarianism, and justice theory. American philosopher Nel Noddings argues that caring is the foundation of morality. She views relationships as ontologically basic to humanity, where identity is defined by the relationships individuals have. Each caring relation consists of at least two people: the "one-caring" and the "cared-for." The one-caring acts in response to a perceived need on the part of the cared-for, motivated by an apprehension of the cared-for’s reality and a commitment to help.

How does the ethics of care differ from other ethical theories?

The ethics of care is a feminist philosophical perspective that uses relational and context-bound approaches to morality and decision-making. It contrasts with ethical theories, such as Kantian deontology , utilitarianism , and justice theory , that rely on principles to highlight moral actions. Unlike these theories, the ethics of care emphasizes the importance of relationships, empathy, and emotional responsiveness in moral judgment. It focuses on responding to others as unique individuals within close relationships, such as those between friends, lovers, and mothers and children, rather than applying general moral rules.

Who helped develop the ethics of care?

The ethics of care, a feminist philosophical perspective, uses relational and context-bound approaches to morality and decision-making. Several individuals contributed to the development of the ethics of care:

Why is caring for others important in the ethics of care?

In the ethics of care, caring for others is essential because it is seen as the foundation of morality. This perspective, developed in part by feminist ethics , emphasizes relationships and context in moral decision-making, contrasting with principle-based ethical theories. Caring involves understanding and responding to the needs of others, with the goal of promoting their well-being. This approach values empathy and emotional responsiveness as vital to moral judgment. The impulse to care is considered a universal human attribute, making caring relationships ethically basic. However, it also recognizes the importance of balancing caring for others with caring for oneself.

How does the ethics of care approach problems differently from rules-based ethics?

The ethics of care and rules-based ethics offer contrasting approaches to moral problems. The ethics of care is a feminist philosophical perspective that prioritizes relational and contextual understanding in moral decision-making, contrasting sharply with ethical theories like Kantian deontology and utilitarianism that rely on universal principles. Instead of applying abstract rules, the ethics of care emphasizes empathy, emotional responsiveness, and maintaining relationships. It focuses on the needs of individuals within specific relationships, with the goal of promoting the well-being of those involved. In contrast, rules-based ethics applies universal principles to determine moral action, often overlooking the complexities of individual circumstances.

What are some examples of how the ethics of care can guide real-life decisions?

The ethics of care is a feminist philosophical perspective that emphasizes relationships and context in moral decision-making, contrasting with principle-based ethical theories. It prioritizes empathy, emotional responsiveness, and the needs of individuals, particularly in close relationships. In real-life decisions, the ethics of care can guide individuals to consider the specific needs and well-being of those involved, rather than applying abstract rules. For example, in health care, it emphasizes the importance of a doctor’s compassion and understanding of a patient’s unique circumstances when making treatment decisions. In business, it promotes compassionate bases for human interaction. In environmentalism, it focuses on human well-being by creating a safe and clean environment. Balancing caring for others and self is a key problem for the ethics of care.

ethics of care

Introduction References & Edit History Quick Facts & Related Topics

Quick Facts

Also called:: care ethics

Related Topics:: Philosophical feminism; Normative ethics

See all related content

ethics of care

ethics and philosophy

Also known as: care ethics

Written by

Craig P. DunnAll

Fact-checked by

Britannica Editors

History

Top Questions

What is the ethics of care?
The ethics of care is a feminist philosophical perspective that uses a relational and context-bound approach toward morality and decision making. It contrasts with ethical theories that rely on principles to highlight moral actions, such as Kantian deontology, utilitarianism, and justice theory.

American philosopher Nel Noddings argues that caring is the foundation of morality. She views relationships as ontologically basic to humanity, where identity is defined by the relationships individuals have. Each caring relation consists of at least two people: the "one-caring" and the "cared-for." The one-caring acts in response to a perceived need on the part of the cared-for, motivated by an apprehension of the cared-for’s reality and a commitment to help.
5 Britannica Sources
Created from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
How does the ethics of care differ from other ethical theories?
The ethics of care is a feminist philosophical perspective that uses relational and context-bound approaches to morality and decision-making. It contrasts with ethical theories, such as Kantian deontology, utilitarianism, and justice theory, that rely on principles to highlight moral actions.

Unlike these theories, the ethics of care emphasizes the importance of relationships, empathy, and emotional responsiveness in moral judgment. It focuses on responding to others as unique individuals within close relationships, such as those between friends, lovers, and mothers and children, rather than applying general moral rules.
2 Britannica Sources
1. philosophical feminism: Feminist ethics
2. ethics of care
Created from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
Who helped develop the ethics of care?
The ethics of care, a feminist philosophical perspective, uses relational and context-bound approaches to morality and decision-making. Several individuals contributed to the development of the ethics of care:
- Carol Gilligan's research into the moral development of girls and women inspired and informed a feminist-oriented movement in philosophical ethics known as the ethics of care.
- Nel Noddings provided one of the first comprehensive theories of care and argued that caring is the foundation of morality.
- Feminist philosophers such as Sara Ruddick, Virginia Held, and Annette Baier sought to explicate virtues and values suitable to everyday sociability.
3 Britannica Sources
Created from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
Why is caring for others important in the ethics of care?
In the ethics of care, caring for others is essential because it is seen as the foundation of morality. This perspective, developed in part by feminist ethics, emphasizes relationships and context in moral decision-making, contrasting with principle-based ethical theories.

Caring involves understanding and responding to the needs of others, with the goal of promoting their well-being. This approach values empathy and emotional responsiveness as vital to moral judgment. The impulse to care is considered a universal human attribute, making caring relationships ethically basic. However, it also recognizes the importance of balancing caring for others with caring for oneself.
3 Britannica Sources
Created from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
How does the ethics of care approach problems differently from rules-based ethics?
The ethics of care and rules-based ethics offer contrasting approaches to moral problems. The ethics of care is a feminist philosophical perspective that prioritizes relational and contextual understanding in moral decision-making, contrasting sharply with ethical theories like Kantian deontology and utilitarianism that rely on universal principles.

Instead of applying abstract rules, the ethics of care emphasizes empathy, emotional responsiveness, and maintaining relationships. It focuses on the needs of individuals within specific relationships, with the goal of promoting the well-being of those involved. In contrast, rules-based ethics applies universal principles to determine moral action, often overlooking the complexities of individual circumstances.
4 Britannica Sources
Created from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
What are some examples of how the ethics of care can guide real-life decisions?
The ethics of care is a feminist philosophical perspective that emphasizes relationships and context in moral decision-making, contrasting with principle-based ethical theories. It prioritizes empathy, emotional responsiveness, and the needs of individuals, particularly in close relationships.

In real-life decisions, the ethics of care can guide individuals to consider the specific needs and well-being of those involved, rather than applying abstract rules. For example, in health care, it emphasizes the importance of a doctor’s compassion and understanding of a patient’s unique circumstances when making treatment decisions. In business, it promotes compassionate bases for human interaction. In environmentalism, it focuses on human well-being by creating a safe and clean environment. Balancing caring for others and self is a key problem for the ethics of care.
7 Britannica Sources
Created from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.

ethics of care, feminist philosophical perspective that uses a relational and context-bound approach toward morality and decision making. The term ethics of care refers to ideas concerning both the nature of morality and normative ethical theory. The ethics of care perspective stands in stark contrast to ethical theories that rely on principles to highlight moral actions—such as Kantian deontology, utilitarianism, and justice theory—and is not meant to be absolute and incontrovertible.

(Read Peter Singer’s Britannica entry on ethics.)

American philosopher Nel Noddings provided one of the first comprehensive theories of care and argued that caring is the foundation of morality. She saw relationships as ontologically basic to humanity, where identity is defined by the set of relationships individuals have with other humans. In suggesting that caring is a universal human attribute, Noddings asserted that a caring relation (a relationship in which people act in a caring manner) is ethically basic to humans. Since the impulse to care is universal, caring ethics is freed from the charge of moral relativism to the same degree as is virtue ethics.

The particularity of relations is fundamental to the ethics of care. According to Noddings, each caring relation consists of at least two people, the “one-caring” and the “cared-for.” Such a relation can certainly be more than merely dyadic (an influence-based relationship between two people) as the one-caring and the cared-for may come to exhibit reciprocal commitment to each other’s well-being. However, what is distinctive in all such relations is that the one-caring acts in response to a perceived need on the part of the cared-for. The act is motivated by an apprehension of the cared-for’s reality, where the one-caring feels and senses what the cared-for is experiencing and initiates a commitment to help. This does not mean that the one-caring does exactly what the cared-for desires in all situations. Rather, the one-caring considers the cared-for’s point of view, assessment of need, and expectations of the one-caring in formulating a response that provides the best opportunity for helping the cared-for. This response might be irrational, since caring involves the commitment to do something, however remote the possibilities of success, to improve the cared-for’s condition. In the ideal situation, however, the reason(s) the one-caring gives for his or her actions would be sufficient to convince a disinterested observer that the one-caring indeed acted in a way to promote the cared-for’s well-being. Caring thus involves sentiment but is not necessarily emotional in nature.

Within the ethics of care, the one-caring receives the cared-for without evaluation. However, in deciding how to respond, the one-caring works in what Noddings called a “problem-solving” mode in order to keep in mind the particular relationship and context and to avoid slipping into the abstract, impartial, impersonal reasoning of the deontologist, the utilitarian, or the justice theorist. Ultimately, there is a defining imperative to act that is a critical function of what it means to care.

These ideals apply to both natural caring, which is caring borne of inclination and love for those close to the one-caring, and ethical caring, which is the feeling response of “I must” to a person’s predicament. Ethical caring is a natural outgrowth of natural caring, but, unlike Kant’s ranking of duty as primary and inclination as secondary, in the ethics of care the inclination to care is primary. Even with regard to those with whom one has no caring relationship—complete strangers—memories of natural caring arise, generating a feeling of “I must do something.” This impulse is obligatory in anyone who aspires to the sense of self as a moral, caring person. However, within the ethics of care, this obligation to the stranger is limited. Two criteria must be met for such a duty to have force: (1) the relationship with the other person must exist (or have the potential to exist), and (2) the relationship must have the potential to grow into a mutually caring relationship. One does not have either the capacity or the duty to care for everyone. However, one does hold an obligation to be prepared to care at all times for particular others—for “the proximate stranger.”

There are three levels of a caring morality: the self is cared for to the exclusion of the other, the other is cared for to the exclusion of the self, and moral maturity, wherein the needs of both self and other are understood. While stopping short of equating this ethics with virtue ethics, some authors have suggested that this portrayal sounds very much like the description of an Aristotelian virtue. Not opposed to a legitimate place for emotion in ethical discourse, Aristotle outlined the importance of feeling at the proper times and for good reasons. He saw the virtues of a moral person as the mean between the extremes of excessive and deficient behaviour. Applying this depiction to caring, the virtue would be caring (understanding the needs of self and other), the vice of excess might be codependence (caring for others to the exclusion of self), and the vice of deficiency might be selfishness (caring for self to the exclusion of others).

Explore Britannica Premium!

The trusted destination for professionals, college students, and lifelong learners.

Although it was not necessary that feminine moral theory be aligned with the ethics of care, it so happens that those writing in the feminine tradition have come to associate care and responsibility to others with a female-gendered approach to ethics and individual rights and justice with a male-gendered approach to ethics. Feminist philosophers have argued that the deontological, utilitarian, and justice moral theories are grounded in the masculine experience. More specifically, those theories are seen to emerge in concert with the traditionally masculine forum of economic activity. Within that perspective, the values of competition and domination are seen to undergird both the activities of the marketplace and the rational moral theories. Philosophers such as American feminist Virginia Held have argued for adopting more compassionate bases for human interaction(s).

Feminist moral theory has tended to mirror the differing gender experiences of women and men, particularly as those affect the development of understanding with respect to the ways the ethical life is conducted. However, it has been noted that “feminist” moral theory is not “feminine” moral theory, as feminist perspectives are not fully determined by gendered points of view. Nevertheless, the suggestion that gender matters, particularly as gender relates to one’s ethical predispositions, calls into question the inherent “objectivity” of ethical theories, which are advanced in part because of their universal merit and application. Feminine moral theory thereby deals a blow to the exclusively rational systems of thought, which have as their grounding an inherent disregard for the inherently personal—and sometimes gender-biased—nature of knowledge construction.

Craig P. Dunn Brian K. Burton

ethics of care

Thank you for signing up!