Environmental law
-
What is environmental law?
Environmental law consists of principles, policies, directives and regulations implemented and enforced by local, national, or international bodies that regulate how humans treat the nonhuman world. It addresses a wide array of issues across diverse legal contexts, such as state bottle-return laws, emission standards for power plants, and international treaties for protecting biological diversity and the ozonosphere. Environmental law has expanded to protect both human health and the environment. Most environmental laws fall into the category of "command and control" legislation.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Why do we need laws to protect the environment?
Environmental laws are crucial because they regulate how humans interact with the nonhuman world. They set standards for acceptable environmental quality and place conditions on activities that could harm the environment, such as discharging pollutants. Without these laws, activities like industrial production could cause significant harm to the environment and human health.
These laws also facilitate the preservation of natural resources and biodiversity, ensuring these are maintained for future generations. Environmental regulations can also address environmental problems that cross political boundaries. Many countries codify environmental protection in their constitutions, demonstrating a global commitment to safeguarding the environment.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What are some common types of environmental laws?
Environmental law is a broad field encompassing principles, policies, directives, and regulations designed to govern how humans interact with the nonhuman world. These laws exist at local, national, and international levels, addressing various issues through statutes, regulations, and court decisions.
Examples of common types of environmental laws include:
* Clean Air Act (CAA) U.S. federal law to prevent air pollution, protect the ozone layer, and promote public health.
* Clean Water Act (CWA) U.S. legislation enacted to restore and maintain clean and healthy waters.
* Endangered Species Act (ESA) U.S. law that protects species threatened with extinction.
* National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) U.S. law requiring federal agencies to assess the environmental impact of their actions.
* Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) U.S. law that regulates the safe handling and disposal of hazardous wastes.7 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How does environmental law help reduce pollution?
Environmental laws reduce pollution through various mechanisms. Command-and-control legislation identifies harmful activities, sets standards, and prohibits non-compliant actions. Environmental assessment mandates increase public information on environmental consequences, improving government and public decision-making. Economic incentives, like pollution taxes and subsidies for clean technology, encourage environmental protection. Performance requirements allow actors to innovate to meet environmental standards. These regulations and policies, implemented at local, national, and international levels, aim to safeguard both human health and the environment.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Who enforces environmental laws?
Environmental laws are enforced by various entities at different levels. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is the primary agency of the U.S. government responsible for setting and enforcing national pollution-control standards. Created in 1970, the EPA administers major statutes, such as the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act.
Many nations also have environmental protections in their constitutions and legal systems. For example, Germany's Basic Law states that the government must protect the natural foundations of life for future generations. International conventions also play a role, though bodies like the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) often lack strong enforcement powers.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How can citizens get involved in supporting or improving environmental law?
Citizens can influence environmental law through public participation in government decisions, such as setting environmental standards or permitting activities that impact the environment. This can be achieved by submitting written comments or attending hearings.
In many countries, citizens have the right to challenge government decisions affecting the environment in court or before administrative bodies. Access to government information on the environment is also crucial, facilitated by laws that mandate public access to environmental information and by international measures like the Rio Declaration and the Aarhus Convention. The Internet plays a significant role in disseminating environmental information.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
News •
Environmental law, principles, policies, directives, and regulations enacted and enforced by local, national, or international entities to regulate human treatment of the nonhuman world. The vast field covers a broad range of topics in diverse legal settings, such as state bottle-return laws in the United States, regulatory standards for emissions from coal-fired power plants in Germany, initiatives in China to create a âGreen Great Wallââa shelter belt of treesâto protect Beijing from sandstorms, and international treaties for the protection of biological diversity and the ozonosphere. During the late 20th century environmental law developed from a modest adjunct of the law of public health regulations into an almost universally recognized independent field protecting both human health and nonhuman nature.
Historical development
Throughout history national governments have passed occasional laws to protect human health from environmental contamination. About ad 80 the Senate of Rome passed legislation to protect the cityâs supply of clean water for drinking and bathing. In the 14th century England prohibited both the burning of coal in London and the disposal of waste into waterways. In 1681 the Quaker leader of the English colony of Pennsylvania, William Penn, ordered that one acre of forest be preserved for every five acres cleared for settlement, and in the following century Benjamin Franklin led various campaigns to curtail the dumping of waste. In the 19th century, in the midst of the Industrial Revolution, the British government passed regulations to reduce the deleterious effects of coal burning and chemical manufacture on public health and the environment.
Prior to the 20th century there were few international environmental agreements. The accords that were reached focused primarily on boundary waters, navigation, and fishing rights along shared waterways and ignored pollution and other ecological issues. In the early 20th century, conventions to protect commercially valuable species were reached, including the Convention for the Protection of Birds Useful to Agriculture (1902), signed by 12 European governments; the Convention for the Preservation and Protection of Fur Seals (1911), concluded by the United States, Japan, Russia, and the United Kingdom; and the Convention for the Protection of Migratory Birds (1916), adopted by the United States and the United Kingdom (on behalf of Canada) and later extended to Mexico in 1936. In the 1930s Belgium, Egypt, Italy, Portugal, South Africa, Sudan, and the United Kingdom adopted the Convention Relative to the Preservation of Fauna and Flora in their Natural State, which committed those countries to preserve natural fauna and flora in Africa by means of national parks and reserves. Spain and France signed the convention but never ratified it, and Tanzania formally adopted it in 1962. India, which acceded to the agreement in 1939, was subject to the sections of the document prohibiting âtrophiesâ made from any animal mentioned in the annex.
Beginning in the 1960s, environmentalism became an important political and intellectual movement in the West. In the United States the publication of biologist Rachel Carsonâs Silent Spring (1962), a passionate and persuasive examination of chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides and the environmental damage caused by their use, led to a reconsideration of a much broader range of actual and potential environmental hazards. In subsequent decades the U.S. government passed an extraordinary number of environmental lawsâincluding acts addressing solid-waste disposal, air and water pollution, and the protection of endangered speciesâand created an Environmental Protection Agency to monitor compliance with them. These new environmental laws dramatically increased the national governmentâs role in an area previously left primarily to state and local regulation.
In Japan rapid reindustrialization after World War II was accompanied by the indiscriminate release of industrial chemicals into the human food chain in certain areas. In the city of Minamata, for example, large numbers of people suffered mercury poisoning after eating fish that had been contaminated with industrial wastes. By the early 1960s the Japanese government had begun to consider a comprehensive pollution-control policy, and in 1967 Japan enacted the worldâs first such overarching law, the Basic Law for Environmental Pollution Control. Not until the end of the 20th century was Minamata declared mercury-free.
Thirty-four countries in 1971 adopted the Convention on Wetlands of International Importance Especially as Waterfowl Habitat, generally known as the Ramsar Convention for the city in Iran in which it was signed. The agreement, which entered into force in 1975, now has nearly 100 parties. It required all countries to designate at least one protected wetland area, and it recognized the important role of wetlands in maintaining the ecological equilibrium.
Following the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, held in Stockholm in 1972, the UN established the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) as the worldâs principal international environmental organization. Although UNEP oversees many modern-day agreements, it has little power to impose or enforce sanctions on noncomplying parties. Nevertheless, a series of important conventions arose directly from the conference, including the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes or Other Matter (1972) and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (1973).
Until the Stockholm conference, European countries generally had been slow to enact legal standards for environmental protectionâthough there had been some exceptions, such as the passage of the conservationist Countryside Act in the United Kingdom in 1968. In October 1972, only a few months after the UN conference, the leaders of the European Community (EC) declared that the goal of economic expansion had to be balanced with the need to protect the environment. In the following year the European Commission, the ECâs executive branch, produced its first Environmental Action Programme, and since that time European countries have been at the forefront of environmental policy making. In Germany, for example, public attitudes toward environmental protection changed dramatically in the early 1980s, when it became known that many German forests were being destroyed by acid rain. The environmentalist German Green Party, founded in 1980, won representation in the Bundestag (national parliament) for the first time in 1983 and since then has campaigned for stricter environmental regulations. By the end of the 20th century, the party had joined a coalition government and was responsible for developing and implementing Germanyâs extensive environmental policies. As a group, Germany, The Netherlands, and Denmarkâthe so-called âgreen troikaââestablished themselves as leading innovators in environmental law.
During the 1980s the âtransboundary effectsâ of environmental pollution in individual countries spurred negotiations on several international environmental conventions. The effects of the 1986 accident at the nuclear power plant at Chernobyl in Ukraine (then part of the Soviet Union) were especially significant. European countries in the pollutionâs downwind path were forced to adopt measures to restrict their populationsâ consumption of water, milk, meat, and vegetables. In Austria traces of radiation were found in cowâs milk as well as in human breast milk. As a direct result of the Chernobyl disaster, two international agreementsâthe Convention on Early Notification of a Nuclear Accident and the Convention on Assistance in the Case of Nuclear Accident or Radiological Emergency, both adopted in 1986âwere rapidly drafted to ensure notification and assistance in the event of a nuclear accident. In the following decade a Convention on Nuclear Safety (1994) established incentives for countries to adopt basic standards for the safe operation of land-based nuclear power plants.
There are often conflicting data about the environmental impact of human activities, and scientific uncertainty often has complicated the drafting and implementation of environmental laws and regulations, particularly for international conferences attempting to develop universal standards. Consequently, such laws and regulations usually are designed to be flexible enough to accommodate changes in scientific understanding and technological capacity. The Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer (1985), for example, did not specify the measures that signatory states were required to adopt to protect human health and the environment from the effects of ozone depletion, nor did it mention any of the substances that were thought to damage the ozone layer. Similarly, the Framework Convention on Climate Change, or Global Warming Convention, adopted by 178 countries meeting in Rio de Janeiro at the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (popularly known as the âEarth Summitâ), did not set binding targets for reducing the emission of the âgreenhouseâ gases thought to cause global warming.
In 1995 the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which was established by the World Meteorological Organization and UNEP to study changes in the Earthâs temperature, concluded that âthe balance of evidence suggests a discernible human influence on global climate.â Although cited by environmentalists as final proof of the reality of global warming, the report was faulted by some critics for relying on insufficient data, for overstating the environmental impact of global warming, and for using unrealistic models of climate change. Two years later in KyĆto, Japan, a conference of signatories to the Framework Convention on Climate Change adopted the KyĆto Protocol, which featured binding emission targets for developed countries. The protocol authorized developed countries to engage in emissions trading in order to meet their emissions targets. Its market mechanisms included the sale of âemission reduction units,â which are earned when a developed country reduces its emissions below its commitment level, to developed countries that have failed to achieve their emission targets. Developed countries could earn additional emission reduction units by financing energy-efficient projects (e.g., clean-development mechanisms) in developing countries. Since its adoption, the protocol has encountered stiff opposition from some countries, particularly the United States, which has failed to ratify it.

" height="20" alt="HEW Logo">