References & Edit History Quick Facts & Related Topics
Britannica AI Icon
Adding us as a Preferred Source tells Google you trust our content, so our articles show up more often in your Google Search, Discover feed, and AI Overviews.
verifiedCite
While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions.
Select Citation Style
Feedback
Corrections? Updates? Omissions? Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login).
Thank you for your feedback

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

Any willful human intervention is believed to be able to ruin the harmony of the natural transformation process. The spontaneous rhythm of the primitive agrarian community and its un-self-conscious symbiosis with nature’s cycles is thus the Taoist ideal of society. Hence the ideal is a form of primitivism.

In the ideal society there are no books; the Laozi (Tao-te Ching) itself would not have been written but for the entreaty of Yin Xi, the guardian of the pass, who asked the ā€œOld Masterā€ to write down his thoughts. In the Golden Age, past or future, knotted cords are the only form of records. The people of this age are ā€œdull and unwitting, they have no desire; this is called uncarved simplicity. In uncarved simplicity the people attain their true nature.ā€

Zhuang Zhou liked to oppose the heaven-made and the man-made; that is, nature and society. He wanted humans to renounce all artificial ā€œcunning contrivancesā€ that facilitate their work but lead to ā€œcunning heartsā€ and agitated souls in which the Tao will not dwell. Man should equally renounce all concepts of measure, law, and virtue. ā€œFashion pecks and bushels for people to measure by and they will steal by peck and bushel.ā€ He blamed not only the culture heroes and inventors praised by the Confucians but also the sages who shaped the rites and rules of society.

That the unwrought substance was blighted in order to fashion implements—this was the crime of the artisan. That the Way (Tao) and its Virtue (te) were destroyed in order to create benevolence and righteousness—this was the fault of the sage.

Even ā€œcoveting knowledgeā€ is condemned because it engenders competition and ā€œfight to the death over profit.ā€