From World War I to the establishment of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes
New solutions to Croatiaās problems became possible with the dissolution of Austria-Hungary during World War I. However, Croatiaās postwar future was threatened by the 1915 Treaty of London, which promised Italy extensive Habsburg territories on the Adriatic in return for entering the war on the Allied side. Representatives of the Habsburg South Slavs in exile, led by the former Croat-Serb Coalition politicians Ante TrumbiÄ and Frano Supilo, set up the Yugoslav Committee to promote the cause of a new Yugoslav state that was to be based on the national unity of the South Slavs and on the principle of self-determination. In July 1917 the leaders of the Yugoslav Committee and representatives of the Serbian government-in-exile signed the Corfu Declaration, announcing the intention of founding at the end of the war a unified South Slav state, conceived of as a democratic, constitutional, and parliamentary monarchy under the KaradjordjeviÄ dynasty. The agreement with Serbia would save Croatia from being partitioned by the Allies as part of vanquished Austria-Hungary, but the declaration did not specify whether the new state would be a federation of equal partners or would merely represent an extension of the Serbian administrative system.
News •
At the same time, a movement for unification developed among South Slav politicians still living under Habsburg authority in Croatia. With the Habsburg monarchy collapsing, the peasantry in revolt, and the Serbian and Italian armies advancing toward Croatian territory, the Croatian Sabor voted in October 1918 to break relations with Austria-Hungary and declared the unification of the lands of Croatia, Dalmatia, and Slavonia in an independent Croatian state. Soon, however, the Sabor announced the incorporation of Croatia into a South Slav state and transferred its power to the newly created National Council of Slovenes, Croats, and Serbs in Zagreb. One dissenting voice was that of Stjepan RadiÄ, leader of the Croatian Peasant Party, who opposed unconditional unification with no reference to the will of the people of Croatia and with no guarantees of national equality in the future state. Notwithstanding the Peasant Partyās objections, in November 1918 representatives of the National Council, the Yugoslav Committee, and the Serbian government signed the Geneva declaration calling for the establishment of a South Slav state with a form of government to be decided by a national Constituent Assembly. On December 1, 1918, delegates of the National Council met Serbiaās regent, Alexander I, to affiliate themselves to the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes.
Croatia in Yugoslavia, 1918ā41
In many respects, the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes represented an expansion of Serbian hegemony over new territories, particularly in Kosovo and Macedonia. In Croatia, discontent with the new state was demonstrated by the massive electoral success of RadiÄās Croatian Peasant Party. Refusing to accept the unification act, RadiÄ called instead for an independent Croatian peasant republic. In elections to the Constituent Assembly in 1920, his party received the fourth largest bloc of votes, but RadiÄ boycotted the assembly, thus making possible the adoption of a constitution in 1921 that imposed a highly centralized administration on the new state. In the following decade the kingdomās multiparty parliament came to be controlled by Serbian centralists, while Croatiaās elected representatives, led by RadiÄ and the Peasant Party, continued to demand a federal system that would allow Croatia autonomy. The parliament made some progress in agrarian reform, with peasants receiving land expropriated from large estates. However, by 1928, when RadiÄ and four other Croatian deputies were assassinated on the floor of the parliament by a Montenegrin deputy, national conflict had brought the political system to a standstill.
Under the dictatorship established in 1929, King Alexander attempted to override ethnic divisions by introducing a supranational patriotism symbolized by the new name of Yugoslavia. The internal borders of the country were redrawn, so that historical Croatia was subdivided into several new banovine (provinces) named after rivers and natural features. However, Croatian nationalism and opposition to the state system were not eradicated by this policy of unitarismāand neither was Serbian hegemony, which simply continued under the name of Yugoslavism. Political repression bred extremism among some opponents of the regime. In 1934 Alexander was assassinated as the result of a plot hatched by the Croatian UstaÅ”a (āInsurgenceā), a separatist association founded in 1929 by Ante PaveliÄ and enjoying the support of Italyās fascist leader, Benito Mussolini. Unlike the majority of Croats, who still believed in a federal solution, members of the UstaÅ”a insisted that only the destruction of Yugoslavia could liberate Croatia.
The new Yugoslav regent, Prince Paul KaradjordjeviÄ, permitted some relaxation in political life, though he prevented the restoration of full democratic rights. The desire for political change led to the formation of a united Yugoslav opposition, which argued for the reinstatement of democracy and for constitutional reform. In Croatia this opposition included the Peasant Party, now led by Vladko MaÄek. In the elections of 1938, the Peasant Party received 80 percent of the vote in Croatia and Dalmatia. Faced with such evidence of popular support for the opposition program, Prince Paul encouraged negotiations between the government and MaÄek. These culminated in the Sporazum (āAgreementā) of August 26, 1939, which created an autonomous Croatian banovina that was largely self-governing except in defense and foreign affairs. The agreement provoked resentment among the Serbs, even in the opposition.