- Née:
- Sandra Day
Sandra Day O’Connor
-
Who was Sandra Day O’Connor?
Sandra Day O’Connor (1930-2023) was an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1981 to 2006 and the first woman to serve on the Supreme Court.
After graduating from Stanford University's law program in 1952, O’Connor worked as a deputy district attorney in California and as a civil attorney for the army in Germany. She then entered Republican politics in Arizona, eventually becoming the first woman to hold the position of majority leader in the Arizona Senate. In 1981, President Ronald Reagan nominated her to the Supreme Court, where she became known as a moderate conservative and a decisive swing vote in cases involving election law and abortion rights.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What important position did Sandra Day O’Connor hold in the United States government?
Sandra Day O'Connor served as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1981 to 2006, becoming the first woman to hold this position. Nominated by President Ronald Reagan in July 1981 to fill a vacancy, she was unanimously confirmed by the Senate and sworn in on September 25, 1981. Prior to her appointment to the Supreme Court, O'Connor had an extensive career in public service, including serving as a deputy district attorney, a civil attorney for the army, and an assistant attorney general for Arizona. She also served in the Arizona Senate from 1969 to 1974, eventually rising to the position of majority leader, the first woman in the United States to do so.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Why was Sandra Day O’Connor’s appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court historic?
Sandra Day O’Connor’s appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court was historic because she was the first woman to serve on the Supreme Court. President Ronald Reagan nominated her in 1981 to fill a vacancy, fulfilling a campaign promise to nominate a woman to the Supreme Court. O’Connor was unanimously confirmed by the Senate, and she served for 25 years, often casting a decisive swing vote in landmark cases.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How did Sandra Day O’Connor influence decisions on the Supreme Court?
Sandra Day O'Connor, the first woman to serve on the Supreme Court, significantly influenced decisions through her pragmatic approach and moderate conservatism. Often a decisive swing vote, she sought workable solutions to major constitutional questions in areas like election law and abortion rights.
O'Connor emphasized equal-protection claims in election law, as seen in Shaw v. Reno (1993) and Bush v. Vera (1996). On abortion rights, her views evolved gradually, as reflected in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services (1989) and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey (1992), where she helped reaffirm the right to abortion while also allowing for certain legal restrictions. In Grutter v. Bollinger (2003), O'Connor wrote the majority opinion, permitting the limited consideration of race in university admissions to promote diversity.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What kinds of cases or issues did Sandra Day O’Connor often work on?
Sandra Day O'Connor, the first woman to serve on the Supreme Court, was known for her pragmatic approach and meticulously researched opinions. As a moderate conservative, she often became a decisive swing vote in the Supreme Court's decisions.
O'Connor worked on cases in fields such as election law and abortion rights, where she sought to create functional solutions to significant constitutional questions, frequently across multiple cases. Her election law decisions emphasized equal protection claims. Regarding abortion rights, she showed a disinclination to support decisions denying women the right to choose safe, legal abortions. O'Connor co-authored the Court's opinion in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey (1992), which reaffirmed the right to abortion established in Roe v. Wade (1973) but also lowered the standard for legal restrictions on abortion.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How did Sandra Day O’Connor’s work impact the United States and future generations?
Sandra Day O'Connor, as the first female Supreme Court Justice, had a profound impact on the United States. Serving from 1981 to 2006, she was known as a moderate conservative and a decisive swing vote in many cases.
O'Connor's legal opinions gradually addressed subjects such as election law and abortion rights. Her vote was essential in Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), which reaffirmed abortion rights but also allowed for legal restrictions that did not create an "undue burden". In Grutter v. Bollinger (2003), O’Connor wrote the majority opinion, finding that race could be considered in university admissions to promote diversity, so long as it was done in a "narrowly tailored" way. Although this ruling was later overturned, O'Connor's emphasis on equal protection claims has had a lasting impact.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
Sandra Day O’Connor (born March 26, 1930, El Paso, Texas, U.S.—died December 1, 2023, Phoenix, Arizona) was an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1981 to 2006. She was the first woman to serve on the Supreme Court. A moderate conservative, she was known for her dispassionate and meticulously researched opinions.
Sandra Day grew up on a large family ranch near Duncan, Arizona. She received undergraduate (1950) and law (1952) degrees from Stanford University, where she met the future chief justice of the United States William Rehnquist. Upon her graduation she married a classmate, John Jay O’Connor III. Unable to find employment in a law firm because she was a woman—despite her academic achievements, one firm offered her a job as a secretary—she became a deputy district attorney in San Mateo county, California. After a brief tenure, she and her husband, a member of the U.S. Army Judge Advocate General Corps, moved to Germany, where she served as a civil attorney for the army (1954–57).
Upon her return to the United States, O’Connor pursued private practice in Maryvale, Arizona, becoming an assistant attorney general for the state (1965–69). In 1969 she was elected as a Republican to the Arizona Senate (1969–74), rising to the position of majority leader—the first woman in the United States to occupy such a position. She later was elected a Superior Court judge in Maricopa county, a post she held from 1975 to 1979, when she was appointed to the Arizona Court of Appeals in Phoenix. In July 1981 President Ronald Reagan nominated her to fill the vacancy left on the Supreme Court by the retirement of Justice Potter Stewart. Described by Reagan as a “person for all seasons,” O’Connor was confirmed unanimously by the Senate and was sworn in as the first female justice on September 25, 1981.
O’Connor quickly became known for her pragmatism and was considered, with Justice Anthony Kennedy, a decisive swing vote in the Supreme Court’s decisions. In such disparate fields as election law and abortion rights, she attempted to fashion workable solutions to major constitutional questions, often over the course of several cases. In her decisions in election law she emphasized the importance of equal-protection claims (Shaw v. Reno [1993]), declared unconstitutional district boundaries that are “unexplainable on grounds other than race” (Bush v. Vera [1996]), and sided with the Court’s more liberal members in upholding the configuration of a congressional district in North Carolina created on the basis of variables including but not limited to race (Easley v. Cromartie [2001]).
In similar fashion, O’Connor’s views on abortion rights were articulated gradually. In a series of rulings, she signaled a reluctance to support any decision that would deny women the right to choose a safe and legal abortion. By “defecting” in part from the conservative majority in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services (1989)—in which the Court upheld a Missouri law that prohibited public employees from performing or assisting in abortions not necessary to save a woman’s life and that required doctors to determine the viability of a fetus if it was at least 20 weeks old—she reduced the Court’s opinion to a plurality. Through her stewardship in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey (1992), the Court refashioned its position on the right to abortion. The Court’s opinion, which O’Connor wrote with Justices Anthony Kennedy and David Souter, reaffirmed the constitutionally protected right to abortion established in Roe v. Wade (1973) but also lowered the standard that legal restrictions on abortion must meet in order to pass constitutional muster. After Casey, such laws would be considered unconstitutional only if they constituted an “undue burden” on women seeking to obtain an abortion.
In 2006 O’Connor retired from the Supreme Court and was replaced by Samuel Alito. She was the author of several books, including Lazy B (2002; cowritten with her brother, H. Alan Day), a memoir focusing on her family’s ranch, and Out of Order: Stories from the History of the Supreme Court (2013), a collection of anecdotes charting the genesis and maturation of the Supreme Court. O’Connor also wrote the children’s books Chico (2005) and Finding Susie (2009), both of which were based on her childhood experiences. In 2009 she was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom. In a letter in 2018 she announced that she had been diagnosed with early-stage dementia and would withdraw from public life.