Charles Gerhardt

Charles Gerhardt (born Aug. 21, 1816, Strasbourg, France—died Aug. 19, 1856, Strasbourg) was a French chemist who was an important precursor of the German chemist August Kekule and his structural organic chemistry.

Early life and education

Gerhardt’s Swiss-born father, Samuel Gerhardt, initially worked in a bank. In 1825 Samuel Gerhardt became a manufacturer of white lead but had little understanding of the technical side of his factory, so in 1831 young Gerhardt was sent to learn chemistry at Karlsruhe Polytechnic in Germany. Afterward he went to a business school in Leipzig, where, however, he preferred to continue his chemical studies. After an unsuccessful attempt to work for his father, he resumed chemical studies with Justus Liebig at the University of Giessen in Germany from 1836 to 1837. A final attempt at reconciliation with his father failed, and Gerhardt left in 1838 to study chemistry under Jean-Baptiste-André Dumas at the University of Paris, from which he received a doctorate in 1841. Gerhardt’s chemical training provided perhaps the best that both Germany and France had to offer, and it put him in an almost unique intermediary position in an age of strong rivalries between their national schools of chemistry. His own strength of character (or, as critics would say, his argumentativeness) determined that he would make up his own mind on the questions of the day.

Academic career

During the 1840s, Gerhardt alienated most European chemists as he accused them of analytical inaccuracies, bad faith, or false claims of priority. Before this, though, Dumas was keen to advance the career of his star pupil, and in 1841 he recommended Gerhardt for appointment to the University of Montpellier in France, initially as a temporary professor of chemistry; only in 1844 was the post confirmed. At Montpellier, Gerhardt found no expectation that professors would conduct research and therefore no facilities or research funds. The frustrations of his academic life closely paralleled those of chemist Auguste Laurent at the University of Bordeaux, whom he met in 1842. They became close friends, collaborators, and partners in provincial “exile.” When Laurent was appointed to a post in Paris in 1848, Gerhardt took leave from Montpellier to be near him, and when this leave was not renewed, he resigned in 1851 and attempted to support himself by private teaching.

Discover the fascinating events that shaped the world, straight from our editors.

SIGN UP

By clicking “Sign Up”, you consent to the Britannica Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Britannica Quiz

Faces of Science

Classification of organic compounds

Though Gerhardt was a skilled analyst, his most important contributions lay in bringing order to the seeming chaos of organic chemistry by reinterpreting the findings of others. Thus, his conception in 1843 of homologous series originated in a generalization of German chemist Hermann Kopp’s observation that the boiling points of methyl and ethyl compounds show an almost constant difference. Gerhardt suggested that successive additions of methylene (CH₂) to a fundamental group yielded a series of related compounds, such as the alcohols. As he asserted, “These substances undergo changes according to the same equations, and we need only know the reactions of one to predict those of the others.”

Theory of residues

Turning his attention to organic substitutions, Gerhardt characterized them as “double decompositions” to describe the general path of substitution involving two reagents—a simple inorganic by-product such as water or hydrogen chloride would be eliminated, followed by the combination of the two residues. For example: C₆H₆ (benzene) + HONO₂ (nitric acid) = H₂O (water) + C₆H₅NO₂ (nitrobenzene). It is worth noting that Gerhardt was one of the first to make significant and consistent use of chemical equations.

Two particular points had theoretical implications. First, Gerhardt denied that his residues carried any electrochemical charge or that they existed as preformed radicals in the reagents. His “unitary chemistry” was thus a further attack on the once-orthodox dualistic electrochemical view of organic combination, which already had been undermined by Dumas’s and Laurent’s substitution studies.

Second, Gerhardt was appalled by the inconsistent weights and differing formulas employed in chemistry. Most chemists used “four-volume” formulas, in which benzene was given as C₂₄H₁₀H₂, but there were also “two-volume” formulas (C₁₂H₅H) and Gerhardt’s own unitary formulas (C₆H₆). How was a classifier to make sense of this chaos? Noting that under the four-volume system water was always eliminated as a double molecule, H₄O₂, Gerhardt proposed—on the grounds of economy, consistency with inorganic chemistry, and comparison of like with like—to halve all of these formulas. This carried the implication that when an odd number of atoms appeared in a published organic formula, the analysis was inaccurate. Gerhardt did not hesitate to criticize the analyses of Liebig, Dumas, and others.

Explore Britannica Premium!

The trusted destination for professionals, college students, and lifelong learners.

SUBSCRIBE

Unfortunately, Gerhardt’s attempt to simplify formulas used in organic and inorganic chemistry was made harder by the fact that he (unlike his friend Laurent) was unable to accept Avogadro’s law; his own view that “atoms, volumes, and equivalents are synonyms” was no substitute. His efforts to improve on conventional weights did, however, encourage a younger generation to try to get them right, which eventually led to the Karlsruhe Congress of chemists in 1860, called to consider these problems.

Gerhardt’s theory of types

The culmination of Gerhardt’s work lay in his 1853 theory of types, the last of the ongoing attempts at organic classification by Laurent and Gerhardt. In 1846 Laurent had suggested that alcohol and ether could be seen as water in which hydrogen was replaced by ethyl residues.

Following the development of techniques of targeted double decomposition, English chemist Alexander Williamson prepared common ether from sodium ethylate and ethyl iodide: C₂H₅ONa (sodium ethylate) + IC₂H₅ (ethyl iodide) = NaI (sodium iodide) + (C₂H₅)₂O (ether). Gerhardt used an analogous reaction to prepare acetic anhydride, (C₂H₃O)₂O. (This finally killed off Swedish chemist Jöns Jacob Berzelius’s conception of organic acids as containing preformed anhydride plus water.) Meanwhile, French chemist Charles-Adolphe Wurtz and German chemist August von Hofmann had been preparing the amines. Gerhardt suggested that all organic compounds could be compared to four fundamental types—hydrogen (H₂), hydrogen chloride (HCl), water (H₂O), and ammonia (NH₃)—simple molecules in which the hydrogen was successively replaced by more-complex residues.

Although Gerhardt insisted that his formulas were merely comparative and classificatory and gave no indication of the actual arrangement of atoms in the molecule, Kekule erected his structure theory of 1858 on the foundation of Gerhardt’s type theory.

Later life

In 1844 Gerhardt married Jane Megget Sanders of Edinburgh, whose brother was studying in Montpellier; through her he learned English and became trilingual. They had two sons and a daughter; the elder son, Charles, was an engineer and cowrote his father’s biography. When Gerhardt was struggling financially in Paris in the early 1850s, his wife’s family provided essential support. Much to the surprise and horror of visiting foreign admirers, he and Laurent were treated as outcasts by the established chemists, led by Dumas. However, Gerhardt’s synthesis of acid anhydrides reestablished his reputation, and in 1855 he was appointed professor of chemistry at both the university and the pharmacy school in his native Strasbourg. Less than a year later, he was taken suddenly ill and died two days short of his 40th birthday.