- Key People:
- John Sirica
- Related Topics:
- dÄta-bar
- magistrat du siĆØge
- juge-mage
- magistrate
- oidor
Judge
-
What is a judge?
A judge is a public official authorized to preside over legal matters in a court of law, determine facts, and apply the law to make impartial decisions. In jury trials, the judge oversees jury selection and instructs them on relevant laws.
Judges exist in many forms, ranging from untrained justices of the peace to members of the U.S. Supreme Court. In the U.S., judges can be elected or appointed, with federal judges often appointed for life by the President with Senate approval. The chief justice of the United States is the highest-ranking judge in the U.S. legal system.
5 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What does a judge do in a courtroom?
In a courtroom, a judge is a public official who presides over legal matters, possessing the authority to hear and determine cases. In jury trials, the judge oversees jury selection and instructs them on the relevant laws. Judges also rule on motions before or during trials. They ensure fair proceedings, and their roles can vary between common-law and civil-law traditions. Ultimately, the judge is central to the court as they guide the process and ensure justice is served.
5 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How does someone become a judge?
Becoming a judge in common-law countries like the United States typically requires formal legal education followed by significant time practicing law, teaching, or working in governmental legal service.
Judgeships are obtained through appointment or election, without competitive exams. Methods vary:
* Appointment Federal courts and some state courts use appointments made by the chief executive (president or governor), often needing legislative approval.
* Election Many states elect judges, sometimes through partisan or non-partisan ballots.
* Missouri Plan This involves a nominating commission that screens candidates, submitting qualified names to an appointing authority, who then selects a judge. After a probationary period, the judge stands for retention via a ballot.3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What is the difference between a judge and a jury?
A judge is a public official who presides over legal matters in court, ruling on motions and, in jury cases, instructing the jury on the law. Judges can be elected or appointed, with varying roles and powers depending on their position and the legal system.
A jury is a group of laypersons selected to make factual determinations and decide on liability or guilt. The judge decides what evidence the jury can consider. The jury renders a verdict based on the evidence presented and the law as instructed by the judge.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What types of cases do judges handle?
Judges preside over legal matters in courts, handling various types of cases. Courts handle criminal cases, determining guilt and consequences, with prosecutions pursued in the public's name. They also handle civil cases involving conflicts alleging personal or financial harm, often requiring the losing party to pay compensation.
Many courts handle both civil and criminal cases and are known as courts of general jurisdiction. Some courts may be organized into specialized branches, such as criminal, civil, or juvenile cases, allowing judges to transfer between different types of work. Specialized tribunals exist for specific issues like estates, business disputes, or labour relations, possessing substantial power despite limited jurisdiction.
6 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How do judges make decisions based on the law and evidence?
Judges make decisions by interpreting legislation and applying it to specific situations, a process that gives meaning and effect to the law. They consider both intrinsic guides, such as the statute itself and rules of grammar, and extrinsic aids, like the statute's history and legislative debates.
In court, judges ensure proceedings properly consider presented evidence to base decisions on truth. They evaluate evidence, which may include witness testimony, documents, or physical objects, to ascertain the truth of alleged facts under investigation. The goal is to discover and give effect to the legislature's intention, while also considering economic, philosophical, or social objectives.
5 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
News •
Judge, public official vested with the authority to hear, determine, and preside over legal matters brought in a court of law.
In jury cases, the judge presides over the selection of the panel and instructs it concerning pertinent law. The judge also may rule on motions made before or during a trial. In countries with a civil-law tradition, a more active role customarily has been assigned to the judge than in countries with a common-law tradition. In civil-law courts the procedure is inquisitorialāi.e., judges do most of the questioning of witnesses and have a responsibility to discover the facts. In common-law courts the procedure is adversarialāi.e., the lawyers for each side do most of the questioning of witnesses and the presentation of evidence.
There are many kinds of judges, ranging from an untrained justice of the peace to a member of the U.S. Supreme Court or of the Court of Queenās Bench. In the United States judges are elected or appointed. Most federal judges are appointed for life by the president with the advice or consent of the Senate. The highest-ranking judge in the U.S. legal system is the chief justice of the United States. See also judgment; judiciary; magistratesā court; Missouri Plan.
The role and power of judges vary enormously, not only from country to country but often within a single country as well. For example, a rural justice of the peace in the United Statesāoften untrained in the law, serving part-time, sitting alone in everyday work clothes in a makeshift courtroom, collecting small fees or receiving a pittance for a salary, trying a succession of routine traffic cases and little elseāobviously bears little resemblance to a justice of the Supreme Court of the United Statesāa full-time, well-paid black-robed professional, assisted by law clerks and secretaries, sitting in a marble āpalaceā with eight colleagues and deciding at the highest appellate level only questions of profound national importance. Yet both persons are judges.
Lay judges
In most civil-law countries, judges at all levels are professionally trained in the law, but in many other countries they are not. In England part-time lay judges greatly outnumber full-time professional judges. Called magistrates or justices of the peace, they dispose of more than 95 percent of all criminal cases and do so with general public satisfaction and the approbation of most lawyers (see magistratesā court). Professional judges handle only the relatively small number of very serious crimes; most of their time is devoted to civil cases. England places an unusually heavy reliance on lay judges, but they are far from unknown in the courts of many other countries, particularly at the lowest trial level. This was also true in the former Soviet Union and remains so in the United States. In some countries of the Middle East (e.g., Israel and Iran), lay judges constitute religious courts and are selected for service on the basis of their knowledge of and fidelity to nonsecular rules and laws. In Finland panels of lay judges sit with credentialed judges in district court criminal cases (and may also be used in some civil cases pertaining to domestic issues). The Japanese enacted legislation in the early 21st century to introduce lay judges into the countryās legal system.
There is considerable diversity in the way lay judges are chosen and used in judicial work. In the United States, for example, lay judges are popularly elected for limited terms, whereas in England they are appointed by a Judicial Appointments Commission (subject to approval by the lord chancellor) to serve until retirement or removal. In England lay judges serve intermittently in panels on a rotating basis for short periods, whereas in the United States they sit alone and continuously. In South Africa lay judges (called assessors) always sit with professional judges; in England they sometimes do; and in the United States they never do. In some developing countries many judges at all levels have little formal legal training. Sometimes they are religious authorities rather than lawyers, since in many countries religion and secular government are not sharply differentiated, and the law derives from religious doctrine. The vast majority of countries that use lay judges at the lowest trial level, however, insist upon professionally trained judges in trial courts of general jurisdiction and in appellate courts.
Professional judges in the civil-law tradition
Professional judges in civil-law countries are markedly different in background and outlook from professional judges in common-law countries. Both have legal training and both perform substantially the same functions, but there the similarities cease. In a typical civil-law country, a person graduating from law school makes a choice between a judicial career and a career as a private lawyer. If he chooses the former and is able to pass an examination, he is appointed to the judiciary and enters service. His first assignment is to a low-level court; thereafter he works his way up the judicial ladder as far as he can until his retirement with a government pension. His promotions and assignments depend upon the way his performance is regarded by a council of senior judges or sometimes upon the judgment of the minister of justice, who may or may not exercise his powers disinterestedly and on the basis of merit. The Japanese system epitomizes this process. The path to legal success is very narrow, providing little room for error in terms of formal education, legal practice, and judicial experience. In Japan, as in the vast majority of civil-law systems, the civil-law judge is a civil servant.

" height="20" alt="HEW Logo">