corporal punishment
-
What is corporal punishment?
Corporal punishment is the act of inflicting physical pain on someone's body as a punishment for a crime or rule violation. Historically, it included methods such as flogging, mutilation, and branding, but today it mainly refers to physical discipline in schools and homes.
While corporal punishment has decreased globally, it is still permitted in some countries and U.S. states. There is considerable debate surrounding its use, with some arguing it can lead to long-term physical and mental harm, while others believe it can be appropriate for certain behavioral issues when used in moderation. The US Department of Education defines corporal punishment as, āpaddling, spanking, or other forms of physical punishment imposed on a childā.
5 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
In what settings is corporal punishment usually given?
Corporal punishment, defined as physical punishment, historically occurred across various settings, but its use has declined in many parts of the world.
Corporal punishment is most common:
* Home Physical discipline of children by parents or caregivers.
* Schools In some countries, corporal punishment is still lawful for disciplining students, though many have banned it.
* Correctional and justice systems Historically, corporal punishment was a common penalty for crimes. Although less common today, beatings and whippings still occur in some prison systems.
* Nations observing Islamic law Whipping and amputation remain prescribed punishments in several Middle Eastern nations that strictly observe Islamic law.3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How is corporal punishment different from other forms of discipline?
Corporal punishment is physical punishment that involves hitting someone. Discipline aims to teach children desirable behavior, while punishment is a penalty to eliminate undesirable behavior.
Effective discipline includes a loving parent-child relationship, reinforcing good behavior, and strategies for eliminating negative behavior, such as time-outs or removing privileges. The American Academy of Pediatrics strongly discourages physical punishment, as it can lead to aggression and mental health concerns, and it signals that violence is a way to settle conflicts. Positive discipline, on the other hand, promotes self-regulation and self-esteem.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What are some examples of corporal punishment?
Corporal punishment is physical pain inflicted on someone's body as punishment for a crime or infraction. It includes flogging, beating, branding, and mutilation. In a broad sense, it also refers to physically disciplining children at home or in school.
Examples of corporal punishment in schools include spanking with a hand or paddle, or striking a student across the hand with a ruler or leather strap. More extreme instances have involved chemical sprays and tasers.
4 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What are arguments for and against corporal punishment?
Corporal punishment is the infliction of physical pain as a response to an offense. Arguments for it include the idea that it can be appropriate for certain children when used in moderation, especially those who test limits. It is argued that today's youth are disrespectful because necessary spanking is forgone.
However, corporal punishment can inflict long-lasting physical and mental harm, leading to problems with aggression and mental health issues. It may create an unsafe environment, signaling that violence is a way to resolve conflicts. The World Health Organization considers it a violation of childrenās rights and can harm their education. Empirical evidence suggests that it is not an effective deterrent and may lead to further offenses.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How have laws and attitudes about corporal punishment changed over time?
Corporal punishment, inflicting physical pain for crimes or infractions, has seen significant shifts in laws and attitudes over time. Rooted in early legal systems like the Babylonian law of lex talionis, it was a common practice until the 18th century.
The growth of humanitarian ideals during the Enlightenment led to its gradual abandonment, replaced by imprisonment and nonviolent penalties in most developed nations. By the early 21st century, over 100 countries had banned corporal punishment in schools. Despite this trend, some Middle Eastern nations still prescribe whipping and amputation under Islamic law. As of 2024, corporal punishment remains lawful in schools in 62 countries.
While some argue for its use in moderation for serious behavioral issues, organizations like the American Academy of Pediatrics say that corporal punishment may lead to violence and mental health concerns.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
corporal punishment, the infliction of physical pain upon a personās body as punishment for a crime or infraction. Corporal punishments include flogging, beating, branding, mutilation, blinding, and the use of the stock and pillory. In a broad sense, the term also denotes the physical disciplining of children in the schools and at home.
Early Babylonian law developed the principle of lex talionis, which asserted that criminals should receive as punishment precisely those injuries they had inflicted upon their victims. Many subsequent societies applied this āeye-for-an-eye and tooth-for-a-toothā principle quite literally in dealing with offenders. From ancient times through the 18th century, corporal punishments were commonly used in those instances that did not call for the death penalty or for exile or transportation. But the growth of humanitarian ideals during the Enlightenment and afterward led to the gradual abandonment of corporal punishment, and by the later 20th century it had been almost entirely replaced by imprisonment or other nonviolent penalties.
Corporal punishment no longer exists in the legal systems of most developed nations of the world. The last floggings in the United States, for example, were carried out in the state of Delaware in 1952 (the practice was abolished there in 1972). British criminal law stood as a rare exception in its legal prescription of whipping as punishment for some offenses, but the infliction of this penalty was severely limited by the Criminal Justice Act of 1948 and was abolished in 1967. Whipping and even amputation remain prescribed punishments in several Middle Eastern nations that strictly observe Islamic law, however. Beatings and other corporal forms of disciplinary action are still administered, whether legally or covertly, in the prison systems of many countries. Corporal punishment is explicitly prohibited by several international conventions on human rights, including the European Convention on Human Rights and the United Nationsā āStandard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners.ā
An important rationale for the use of corporal punishment has historically been that the pain, injury, humiliation, and degradation it inflicted would deter the offender from committing similar offenses in the future. It was also maintained that, for instance, the amputation of a pickpocketās right hand would lessen his physical ability to commit similar crimes in the future or that the branding of a telltale mark upon his forehead would alert his potential victims in a crowd to take special precautions while they were in his vicinity. The claim that corporal punishment is an especially effective deterrent has been refuted by empirical evidence, however, which shows that offenders who are punished by corporal means are actually slightly more likely to commit further crimes than are those punished by imprisonment. Although there have been some calls for the reinstitution of corporal punishment in response to rising crime rates in the United States and other countries in the post-World War II era, corporal punishment continues to be regarded as an inhumane and barbaric relic of the criminal justice systems of bygone eras.
Most European countries have partially or completely banned the corporal punishment of children in schools and at home, in compliance with the European Social Charterāadopted in 1961 and revised in 1996āwhich protects children from physical abuse. The Council of Europe, an organization of nearly all European countries that promotes human rights and democracy on the continent, has sought to abolish the practice. The corporal punishment of children by parents or caregivers has also been banned in some non-European countries. The Convention on the Rights of the Child, which was adopted by the United Nations in 1989, forbids the physical abuse of children by parents or other caregivers. The convention has been ratified by all UN members except the United States and Somalia. By the early 21st century, more than 100 countries had also banned the corporal punishment of children in schools. See also flogging.



" height="20" alt="HEW Logo">