collective action problem
-
What is a collective action problem?
A collective action problem arises when individual incentives discourage joint action toward a common goal. It stems from conflicting interests: participating in a collective action can be costly, tempting individuals to avoid contributing, especially if they believe the action will succeed anyway. This is known as free-riding: benefiting from a collective effort without contributing to it.
Game theory illustrates this, showing how rational individual actions can lead to suboptimal outcomes, as seen in the prisoner's dilemma. While cooperation benefits everyone, the allure of free-riding and fear of exploitation often hinder it. However, collective action isn't impossible; varying levels can be expected depending on the circumstances. People devise ways to overcome these problems and work together.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Why do collective action problems happen?
Collective action problems arise from inherent disincentives that discourage individuals from jointly pursuing a common goal. Though individuals may share common interests, conflicting interests emerge when participation is costly, leading to free-riding.
People may avoid contributing, hoping the collective action succeeds without their input. Mancur Olson argued rational individuals prioritize personal outcomes, reducing incentives to contribute to public goods. Garrett Hardin noted that individual corporations or states might opt to free ride due to costs affecting profits and competitiveness. Game theory also demonstrates that individual rational action can lead to suboptimal outcomes.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How can a collective action problem affect a group’s ability to reach a common goal?
A collective action problem arises when individual disincentives discourage joint action towards a common goal. This occurs because individuals may prioritize their own conflicting interests over the group's objective.
Several factors exacerbate this problem:
* Free-riding: Individuals may avoid contributing, hoping to benefit from others' efforts without incurring costs.
* Group size: Larger groups may diminish the impact of individual contributions, increasing the temptation to free-ride.
* Heterogeneity: Diverse groups may struggle to discover shared preferences due to conflicting interests.However, collective action is not impossible. Smaller, more homogenous groups with strong coordination and interactive members can overcome these problems more easily. Additionally, incentives, such as selective benefits or the presence of political entrepreneurs, can motivate participation and help achieve common aims.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What is the "free rider" problem in collective action?
The "free rider" problem arises when individuals benefit from a collective good without contributing to its production. Mancur Olson argued individuals have little rational incentive to contribute to a public good because they benefit whether they contribute or not.
Unions combat free riding through selective incentives, like benefits only for members. States address it by taxing citizens for public goods. Garrett Hardin argued corporations free ride on environmental concerns due to costs affecting profits. Game theory shows individual rational action leads to suboptimal outcomes, but cooperation can emerge. Overcoming collective action problems involves recognizing shared interests and supply-side solutions.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How can rules or agreements help solve collective action problems?
Rules and agreements can help solve collective action problems by shaping behavior and making certain actions more or less attractive. These rules can be formal, like laws and treaties, or informal, such as customs.
Smaller groups often find it easier to organize than larger ones, but the degree of interaction among group members is more important than group size. Overcoming coordination difficulties may require an actor or set of actors to step in. Additionally, offering selective incentives can encourage participation in collective action. Game theory also shows that collective action is possible, and depending on the conditions, varying levels of collective action can be expected.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Can you give a real-life example of a collective action problem and how people tried to fix it?
A collective action problem arises when individuals don't work together to achieve a shared objective because each has conflicting interests. A real-world example is union wage bargaining: all workers benefit from the outcome, but non-union members don't pay dues, creating a free-rider problem.
To fix this, unions offer exclusive benefits like legal advice or pension schemes to members. Another approach involves convincing potential free-riders that their contribution is essential for the collective good to be provided at all. Unions can also seek state intervention to mandate membership through closed shops.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
collective action problem, problem, inherent to collective action, that is posed by disincentives that tend to discourage joint action by individuals in the pursuit of a common goal.
Collective action occurs when a number of people work together to achieve some common objective. However, it has long been recognized that individuals often fail to work together to achieve some group goal or common good. The origin of that problem is the fact that, while each individual in any given group may share common interests with every other member, each also has conflicting interests. If taking part in a collective action is costly, then people would sooner not have to take part. If they believe that the collective act will occur without their individual contributions, then they may try to free ride. David Hume pointed out the problem in 1740, when he said in A Treatise of Human Nature that, although two neighbours may agree to drain a common meadow, to have a thousand neighbours agree on such a project becomes too complex a matter to execute.
The challenges of common goods
The problems of collective action were popularized by the American political economist Mancur Olson, who wrote in 1965 that coercion or some other device must be present in order for a group of individuals to act in their common interest. Olson suggested that collective action problems were solved in large groups by the use of selective incentives. These selective incentives might be extra rewards contingent upon taking part in the action or penalties imposed on those who do not. However, in order for positive selective incentives to work, individuals who take part in collective action must be identified; and for negative selective incentives, those who do not take part must be identified. Either way, a good deal of organization is required.
" height="20" alt="HEW Logo">
Game theory
One aspect of the collective action problem is that posed by collective or public goods. A collective good is one that is economically infeasible to exclude people from using. Hence, if a collective good—such as collective wage bargaining for an industry—is provided by an organization such as a trade union, then the fruits of that bargaining will be enjoyed by all workers, not only the trade unionists. Other workers in the industry who gain the wage increases and better working conditions provided by that bargaining will not have to pay the union dues and will free ride upon the activities of the union. In order to encourage workers to join unions, most also provide a whole host of private excludable services, such as legal advice and help during individual disputes with employers, pension schemes, holiday deals, and other such activities. Of course, setting up a union in the first place is also a collective act, and Olson suggested that setting up such organizations requires the activities of entrepreneurs who also see private benefits (such as paid employment or a political career) from forming the union in the first place. Of course, altruistic individuals may also play a part in collective action.
Collective action problems have often been represented by simple game theory. The simple, one-shot “prisoner’s dilemma” game represents a series of more complex situations, where individual rational action leads to a suboptimal outcome. It would be in the interests of both players to cooperate, but they end up not cooperating because they can see the advantages of free riding and fear the dangers of being taken for a ride. It is well known among game theorists that once the two-person game is repeated over and again, there is a multiplicity of stable equilibriums, of which some involve cooperation and some do not. If the game is played by more than two people and network effects are allowed (that is, players can see how others are playing with third parties), then one should expect both cooperation and free riding.
Thus, game theory shows that collective action is indeed a problem. People do not automatically work together to promote their collective interests, but neither is it impossible. Indeed, depending on the conditions, one should expect varying levels of collective action. In other words, there is not a single collective action problem but a host of collective action problems that share common features. Therefore, as one would expect, there are numerous ways in which people learn to overcome the particular collective action problems they face in order to work together. The tedium of organizing a school fete is not the same as the dangers inherent in taking part in collective protest or revolution, but both are collective acts subject to free riding. Described below are the types of demand-side problems that arise in collective action and the sorts of supply-side solutions that are adopted to overcome them. It will be seen that both the problems and the solutions are interlinked and interrelated.
The free-rider problem occurs wherever there is a collective good giving nonexcludability. Nonexcludability entails the free-rider problem because a person can enjoy the benefits of the good without having to pay for it (as long, of course, as the good is provided). A supply-side response is to attempt to convince would-be free riders that if they do not contribute, they will not receive the good, not through exclusion but because the good will not be provided at all.
The trusted destination for professionals, college students, and lifelong learners.
SUBSCRIBE
However, prior to free riding is the recognition of one’s interests. In economic theory it is usually assumed that people have well-defined preference orderings and, hence, know their own interests. But a great deal is spent on the supply side convincing people that something is in their own interest. In that sense, the first collective action problem is the recognition that people do share interests.
The more homogenous the group, the easier it is to discover any shared preferences, the fewer the cross-cutting cleavages, and, thus, the fewer the sources of conflict within the group. Homogeneity in another sense may work in the opposite direction. If the group is heterogeneous in terms of wealth, then it may be easier to secure collective action, because the rich members may provide the goods and allow poorer members to free ride.