Iron Pillar of Delhi
What is the Iron Pillar of Delhi known for?
Where was the Iron Pillar of Delhi originally made?
What is the significance of the inscriptions on the Iron Pillar of Delhi?
How was the Iron Pillar of Delhi constructed?
What theories explain the Iron Pillar of Delhiās rust resistance?
Iron Pillar of Delhi, pillar rising above the central courtyard of the Quwat-ul-Islam mosque in the Quį¹b Minar complex in Mehrauli, Delhi, that is famous for its rust resistance despite having been created more than 1,600 years ago, about 400 ce. The six-ton pillar was made during the Gupta period, likely at Udayagiri in what is now the state of Madhya Pradesh. Other accounts, however, mention Mathura as the likely place where the Iron Pillar originally stood. At the time it was first erected, the decorative seven-part capital that tops the column may have held a figure of Garuda, a bird in Hindu mythology that bore the god Vishnu in the sky. Some researchers believe that the Iron Pillar was moved from Udayagiri to Delhi on the orders of the sultan Iltutmish in the 13th century. Others believe that it was moved to a temple in Lal Kot, Delhi, by the Tomara king Anangapala in 1050 and was moved to its current position near the mosque about 1191. Originally made for a temple of Vishnu, the pillar currently adorns the grounds of the first mosque on the Indian subcontinent and is considered one of the most important objects in Indian history.
Description
The pillar measures a total of 23.5 feet (7.2 meters) tall, counting the portion that is belowground. The cylindrical portion above ground level measures 17 feet (5.2 meters) from a stone platform, likely added in 1871 or 1872. This cylindrical portion tapers from a diameter of 16.7 inches (42 cm) at the bottom (above ground level) to a diameter of 11.85 inches (30 cm) just under the decorative capital. The bottom 2 feet (0.6 meters) of the 17-foot cylindrical portion has a rough surface with hammer marks. Evidence suggests that the pillar was initially buried deeper than it is at present. One piece of evidence in support of this is the rough portion visible at the bottom of the pillar. It has been argued that the rough texture is not an unintended defect but instead was designed to help the pillar grip to the ground, suggesting that this portion was originally underground. The base of the pillar appears to be flat, with eight small projections spaced evenly around the circumference that jut into a sheet of lead. The lead sheet lies on top of a dressed stone slab on the original floor of the temple.
Sanskrit inscriptions appear in several places on the pillar. The oldest is a six-line engraving 7 feet (2 meters) above the platform. It states that the pillar was created for a temple to Vishnu, at the order of a king with the name Chandra. This may be King Chandragupta II of the Gupta dynasty, but the identity is uncertain. A later inscription states that āin Samvat 1109 [1052ā53 ce] Ang Pal [founded] Dehali,ā suggesting the involvement of the Tomara king Anangapala.
Corrosion resistance
The pillar has been studied by a number of metallurgists, the initial analysis having been completed in 1912. The artifact was extensively studied by metallurgist Ramamurthy Balasubramaniam (1961ā2009), who was a professor of materials and metallurgical engineering at the Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur. In 2005 he published the book Story of the Delhi Iron Pillar, which examines the history, fabrication, and composition of the pillar. The artifact consists largely of iron, with small amounts of phosphorus, carbon, manganese, nickel, silicon, copper, nitrogen and sulfur. The pillar was likely created in a horizontal position, using the forge welding technique. This method involved using intense heat to combine lumps of iron weighing 40ā50 pounds (18ā23 kilograms) apiece. The capital was constructed from seven individual parts. They were fitted over a hollow cylinder that was then inserted into the body of the pillar.
Although many believe that the pillarās resistance to corrosion is a mystery, scientists have several theories that try to explain this phenomenon. These can be divided into two main categories. First, there is a climatic explanation: Delhiās relative humidity is under 70 percent for most of the year, which is consistent with low levels of rust. However, the weather data on which this climatic information is based were collected in a short span of time (from 1930 to 1960), which is inadequate for determining climatic conditions over the vast span of the pillarās existence. In addition, the climate of the original location should also be considered. After nearly a decade of self-funded study, Balasubramaniam put forth another theory, based on chemistry, which helped explain how the formation of protective rust on the pillarās iron contributes to its corrosion resistance. The Iron Pillar, contrary to what many believe, is not completely rust-free. It has been found to have distinct rust layers, including a protective layer composed of crystalline iron hydrogen phosphate hydrate above the inner metal core, which gives the pillar its corrosion resistance due to its low porosity. The phosphorus in the iron facilitates as well as participates in these reactions. Balasubramaniam mentioned that Delhiās atmosphere also aids the formation of the crystalline iron hydrogen phosphate hydrate layer that makes the pillar corrosion resistant. He noted that the pillar is a testament to the excellent extraction and processing skills of ancient Indian ironsmiths. The pillarās properties may serve as a model for the future development of corrosion-resistant iron.


" height="20" alt="HEW Logo">