How did Blaise Pascal use the idea of a wager to defend belief in God?

Created from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.

In the philosophy of religion, Pascal’s wager is a practical argument formulated by the French mathematician and philosopher Blaise Pascal in his work PensĂ©es. Applying elements of game theory, Pascal argued that because human reason cannot definitively prove or disprove the existence of God, individuals must choose whether to live as if God exists.12

Pascal framed this choice as a wager with significant stakes:
* If you believe and God exists: You gain infinite happiness.1
* If you do not believe and God exists: You face infinite suffering.1
* If you believe and God does not exist: You lose only the finite pleasures of a life unconstrained by Christian morality.1
* If you do not believe and God does not exist: You gain only finite pleasure.1

Pascal concluded that since the potential gain of belief is infinite and the potential loss is finite, the only rational choice is to wager that God exists. This argument serves as a motive for self-persuasion rather than an attempt to provide empirical evidence for truth.12