Britannica AI Icon
Adding us as a Preferred Source tells Google you trust our content, so our articles show up more often in your Google Search, Discover feed, and AI Overviews.
verifiedCite
While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions.
Select Citation Style
Feedback
Corrections? Updates? Omissions? Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login).
Thank you for your feedback

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

External Websites

When Taylor Swift said yes to Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce in August 2025, it seemed as if all the megastar’s romantic anthems were coming true. And by proposing with what fans quickly identified as a dazzling Old Mine-cut diamond set on a gold mount, Kelce joined a long tradition of offering a woman a ring as a promise to marry. The engagement ring, however, wasn’t always seen in this way. Its history, though obscure, spans thousands of years, shifting from a practical token of ownership to an expression of love and commitment.

A legal contract in ancient Rome

The custom of giving a ring to the bride-to-be may have started with the ancient Egyptians, but the earliest concrete evidence of engagement rings is with the ancient Romans. They treated a ring as a symbol of a couple’s legal agreement to marry. It was not a romantic gesture, but a way of outwardly showing that a woman was off the market. Indeed, a woman traditionally received a ring made of iron, which represented her transition from being her father’s property to her husband’s.

Lest readers think that the Romans had no hearts, however, women from wealthier families also received a gold ring that they wore in public, and later Roman rings were sometimes inscribed on the inside with such terms of endearment as honey.

The Catholic church adopts rings in the Middle Ages

In the 12th century the Roman Catholic Church added marriage as a holy sacrament and integrated placing a ring on the bride’s finger into the marriage ceremony. Some historians believe that it was during this period that the engagement ring and the wedding band became two separate pieces of jewelry: the first as a promise to marry and the second as a formality for the religious ceremony.

Synagogues adopt rings, too

About the same time, Jewish weddings also took on a ring as part of the marriage ceremony, with the groom often placing an elaborate ring onto the bride’s finger. The jewelry piece frequently featured a miniature gable roof on the bezel, possibly symbolizing the Temple of Jerusalem. The height of the architectural feature enabled witnesses at the ceremony to see the ring and thus further validated the marriage. The bauble, however, was not the bride’s to keep, but likely belonged to either the family or the community. It may have been kept in the synagogue and shared among members.

Gimmel rings, posy rings, and early diamonds during the Renaissance

By the 15th century there were many types of engagement rings, including gimmel rings, which were composed of two or three interlaced hoops that could be separated, and posy rings, which contained inscriptions of love on the interior of the band.

The addition of diamonds to engagement rings was a growing trend, with many sources citing 1477 as the year of the first recorded diamond engagement ring. That year Maximilian, archduke of Austria (later Maximilian I, who became Holy Roman emperor in 1493), commissioned a ring set with small diamonds in the shape of an M for his betrothal to Mary, duchess of Burgundy. Jewelry historian Marion Fasel, however, argues that this milestone has been overblown and that by the time Maximilian proposed, the practice of presenting a diamond engagement ring to a bride-to-be was already a tradition among the aristocracy.

Explore Britannica Premium!

The trusted destination for professionals, college students, and lifelong learners.

SUBSCRIBE
Penguin, ship, mountain, atlas
shohei ohtani, plants, andy wharhol art
Mobile

Diamonds in the 19th and 20th centuries

Yet it was several centuries after Maximilian’s engagement that diamonds became the standard for engagement rings in every social class. A combination of factors led to the diamond’s dominance. The start of the Industrial Revolution in the 18th century was one, for it increased the overall amount of wealth in Europe and the United States and helped enlarge the middle class. The discovery of diamonds in South Africa in 1867 was another, making the gems available to a wider population. But it was De Beers, the world’s largest producer and distributor of diamonds, that, according to Sotheby’s, launched the diamond engagement ring into the stratosphere. The company’s hugely successful 1947 ad campaign used the slogan “A diamond is forever,” succinctly and simultaneously hitting on the durability of a diamond and the lifetime promise of a marriage.

Men adopt wedding bands during World War II

As for the men’s side, they may have worn rings to indicate their marital status in previous decades. German author Gotthold Ephraim Lessing’s 1767 comedy Minna von Barnhelm features a pair of matching engagement rings between a man and a woman as a crucial plot point. But that practice was probably rare. In the 1920s jewelry manufacturers and retailers began a push in the United States to make men’s engagement rings a thing, but it was a total bust.

American men did, however, embrace wedding bands a couple of decades later when the country entered World War II. For soldiers fighting abroad these rings served as a reminder of their spouses back at home. The tradition continued after the war, and, by the late 1940s, 80 percent of weddings between a man and a woman included the exchange of wedding bands.

Rings in South America

Although engagement rings for men might have been a flop in the United States in the 1920s, in a few South American countries, such as Chile and Brazil, couples exchanged rings when they decide to marry. Each individual wears a ring on the fourth finger of the right hand during their engagement, and at the wedding ceremony they switch the same rings to the fourth finger of their left hand.

Why Are Wedding Rings Worn on the Left Hand?

A few sources suggest that ancient cultures placed engagement rings on the fourth finger—fittingly called the ring finger—of the left hand because they believed that was where the vena amoris, or “vein of love,” was located. The vein of love was thought to run directly to the heart. Alas, modern medicine has proved that there is no such vein.

Rings for everyone in the 21st century

Today, with the legalization of same-sex marriage and the growing demand for gender-neutral fashion, engagement rings for men have become increasingly popular.

Globalization has also spread the tradition of engagement rings and wedding bands to many parts of the world, where they have been embraced. This custom, however, hasn’t always been the standard.

Traditions in India

In India, for example, Hindu weddings have rich traditions involving markers of marriage. A ceremony might include a groom applying sindoor, or vermillion, to the bride’s hair part, which she will subsequently apply herself throughout her married life. He may also tie a necklace, called mangalsutra (“auspicious thread”; also called thaali and minnu in southern India) around the bride’s neck, which she will continue to wear as a married woman. This piece usually comprises a gold chain with black beads and a pendant.

Additional symbols of marriage include toe rings (bichiya in northern India, metti in southern India), which, in some Indian communities are worn on the second toe of each foot, as well as white shell bangles (shakha) and red coral bangles (pola) that are often worn by Bengali women. Meanwhile, some Indian men wear a janeu, or sacred thread, made of six strings upon getting married, up from the three-string janeu worn by younger men. This practice is more common among members of the Brahmin caste, the highest ranking of the four varnas, or social classes, in India.