
Karl Montevirgen is a professional freelance writer who specializes in the fields of finance, cryptomarkets, content strategy, and the arts. Karl works with several organizations in the equities, futures, physical metals, and blockchain industries. He holds FINRA Series 3 and Series 34 licenses in addition to a dual MFA in critical studies/writing and music composition from the California Institute of the Arts.
Doug is a Chartered Alternative Investment Analyst who spent more than 20 years as a derivatives market maker and asset manager before “reincarnating” as a financial media professional a decade ago.
Before joining Britannica, Doug spent nearly six years managing content marketing projects for a dozen clients, including The Ticker Tape, TD Ameritrade’s market news and financial education site for retail investors. He has been a CAIA charter holder since 2006, and also held a Series 3 license during his years as a derivatives specialist.
Doug previously served as Regional Director for the Chicago region of PRMIA, the Professional Risk Managers’ International Association, and he also served as editor of Intelligent Risk, PRMIA’s quarterly member newsletter. He holds a BS from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and an MBA from Illinois Institute of Technology, Stuart School of Business.

If youâre just learning about stock splits, you may have heard some variation of the pizza analogy. It goes like this: A stock split is like cutting a pizza. Whether you cut it into four or eight slices (or you square-cut it into 24 slices), itâs still the same pizza.
Thatâs a stock split. A company may split its shares by a factor of 2:1, 4:1, or even 10:1. The number of shares increases, but the price per share goes down in proportion, so in the end, the companyâs total value is the same before and after a split.
A stock split is a company-driven decision to create more shares by dividing existing shares into multiple new shares. The value of the total sharesâthe companyâs market capitalizationâremains the same; there are just more of them.
Hereâs an uber-simple example:
Thatâs pretty straightforward. But when you look at the motivations behind a stock split, youâll find it can get complicated. Stocks are essentially valued based on todayâs fundamentals plus expectations of tomorrowâs fundamentals. Itâs that second part that can affect a companyâs value in and around a split.
Some companies see a stock split as something of a win/win proposition:
For example, take the Amazon (AMZN) 20-for-1 stock split in 2022. Before the split, a single share would have cost an investor around $2,785. After the split, the price of each share was around $139. Thatâs pretty affordable. And consequently, the stock popped more than 4% on the day of the split.
Consider a young stock investor with $5,000 to invest who wants to own Amazon stock. Before the 2022 split, a single share at $2,785 would have constituted 55% of their portfolio. At that price, itâs hard to avoid putting too many eggs in one basket, as the diversification adage goes. But at the post-split price of $139, a single share would represent only 3% of the portfolio.
Not all companies believe stock splitting is a good idea. Take Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-A)âtechnically an insurance underwriter but actually a holding company for legendary investor Warren Buffett and his management team. As of May 2023, a single share was trading for about $500,000. Thatâs well above the cost of an average American house.
Why doesnât Buffett and team split Berkshireâs shares? He believes the stock should âparallelâ the value the company has accumulated over time. That being said, Berkshire does list a separate (âBâ) class of shares (BRK-B) that as of May 2023 trades at about $325 per share. The B-shares are splittable (and in fact, did a 50:1 split back in 2010), and they hold much less voting power than A-shares, but they are much more accessible.
Stock splits tend to generate âabnormal returns,â according to a Columbia University study. And because the companyâs fundamentals donât change per se, perhaps thereâs something to the âsignaling effect.â
According to the Columbia paperâs findings, analysts tend to bump up their earnings forecasts after a stock split. As a consequence, these companies tend to see better future earnings growth for up to two years after the split, as compared to their peers.
In other words, historical consistency does speak in favor of splitting companies, but remember that ultimately, the long-term fundamentals of a company are what eventually validate or invalidate its stockâs price, regardless of whether it chooses to split its stock.
Historically, bullish outcomes tend to follow stock split events, often in the form of higher earnings expectations and sometimes earnings growth. But you shouldnât take it for grantedânothing is certain in the world of stock picking.
Some active traders used to buy a stock a few weeks before the split and sell it just a few days before the actual split. This worked at one time, but these days, enough traders seem to have figured out the play, making it less reliable (and lucrative). What was once a self-fulfilling prophecy is now just an outdated tactic that may not be worth your time, effort, and risk.
That being said, if a split might affect a companyâs inclusion (or exclusion) from an index, there may be opportunities. At minimum, itâs something to pay attention to.
Stock split ratios are often 2:1, 3:2, and 3:1, according to FINRA. But as mentioned, Amazon split 20-for-1 in 2022, as did Google parent Alphabet (GOOGL). Apple (AAPL) split 4:1 in 2020 and 7:1 back in 2014.
A reverse stock split combines two or more shares into one share. The general perception is that theyâre bearish.
Why are reverse splits bearish? For one thing, a company whose shares are dismally underperforming may choose to do a reverse split to (artificially) drive up the price of the stock. It might look like a bait and switch, but in some cases, itâs necessary.
For example, companies whose stock prices fall below a certain price risk getting booted from the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) or Nasdaq. Raising their stock prices via reverse split may be the only way to stay listed.
During its golden years, shares of General Electric (GE) split several times. But when the company fell on hard times during the 2010s, shares sank so low that âThe Generalâ slashed its quarterly dividend. In 2021, GE did a 1:8 reverse stock split, which reduced the share count from about eight billion shares down to about one billion and, in turn, bumped up the share price eightfold, from about $5 to $40 per share.
Just as a pizza is still a pizza no matter how you slice it, a stock split doesnât change the fundamentals of a company.
But thatâs where the analogy ends. Stock splits can often stoke demand, whether through increased accessibility, demand from fund managers, and/or the âsignaling effect.â
Although stock splits are generally bullishâat least in the short termâthe companyâs fundamental performance over time is what will determine the future value of each share. So if youâre looking to invest in a stock thatâs about to split, remember to base your decision on the companyâs overall health and growth prospects and whether it fits with your investing objectives.