
Doug is a Chartered Alternative Investment Analyst who spent more than 20 years as a derivatives market maker and asset manager before “reincarnating” as a financial media professional a decade ago.
Before joining Britannica, Doug spent nearly six years managing content marketing projects for a dozen clients, including The Ticker Tape, TD Ameritrade’s market news and financial education site for retail investors. He has been a CAIA charter holder since 2006, and also held a Series 3 license during his years as a derivatives specialist.
Doug previously served as Regional Director for the Chicago region of PRMIA, the Professional Risk Managers’ International Association, and he also served as editor of Intelligent Risk, PRMIA’s quarterly member newsletter. He holds a BS from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and an MBA from Illinois Institute of Technology, Stuart School of Business.
Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree. They write new content and verify and edit content received from contributors.

The price/earnings-to-growth ratio (PEG) refines the price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) by adjusting for expected earnings growth (expressed as a whole number, e.g., 10 for 10%).
PEG="P/E" ratio ÷ earnings growth rate
For example, a company trading at 20 times earnings with an expected annual growth rate of 10% would have a PEG ratio of (20 ÷ 10) = 2. In this case, investors are paying two times the company’s projected growth rate.
PEG takes the familiar P/E ratio and asks a follow-up question: Is that price justified by growth? A stock with a P/E of 20 may look expensive on its own, but if the company is expected to grow earnings by 25% a year, it may look like a bargain by PEG standards. In contrast, a mature firm with the same P/E but only 5% growth would show a PEG of 4, indicating a much steeper price tag.
The price/earnings-to-growth (PEG) ratio is just one of the many fundamental indicators that analysts and investors use to gauge value. Learn how the P/E, P/B, PEG, and others compare in Britannica Money’s guide to financial ratios.
Growth rates usually come from analyst consensus forecasts or company guidance, which means PEG is only as good as the assumptions built into those estimates. Different analysts can reach different conclusions about the same company’s outlook, and those estimates can shift quickly as new data arrives.
Like P/E, PEG comes in two flavors:
Both versions have their limits. Trailing PEG can miss a shift in earning momentum, while forward PEG is only as accurate as the estimates it relies on. Regardless of which PEG you’re using, the interpretation (and industry rule of thumb) is the same.
But fair value isn’t one-size-fits-all. For example, an early-stage technology company can justify a PEG well above 1.0 if its growth is accelerating, while a utility with predictable earnings might look reasonable only if its PEG sits below 1.0.
In practice, investors treat the 1.0 mark as a starting reference, then adjust expectations based on sector norms and the business’s growth profile.
PEG puts a company’s price tag into the context of its growth rate. That makes it especially useful for growth and momentum stocks, where earnings may be slim, negative, or distorted and P/E alone loses meaning. A company with a triple-digit P/E can still look reasonable if its growth is fast enough to bring the PEG closer to 1.
But PEG isn’t foolproof. Because it leans on forecasts, it can mislead if growth assumptions prove too rosy. That’s why investors often pair PEG with other measures—like the cash burn rate or the size of the company’s potential market—to see whether growth expectations are backed by real opportunity and a sustainable business model.
This article was most recently revised and updated by Doug Ashburn