
Dan is a veteran writer and editor specializing in financial news, market education, and public relations. Earlier in his career, he spent nearly a decade covering corporate news and markets for Dow Jones Newswires, with his articles frequently appearing in The Wall Street Journal and Barronâs.
Doug is a Chartered Alternative Investment Analyst who spent more than 20 years as a derivatives market maker and asset manager before “reincarnating” as a financial media professional a decade ago.
Before joining Britannica, Doug spent nearly six years managing content marketing projects for a dozen clients, including The Ticker Tape, TD Ameritrade’s market news and financial education site for retail investors. He has been a CAIA charter holder since 2006, and also held a Series 3 license during his years as a derivatives specialist.
Doug previously served as Regional Director for the Chicago region of PRMIA, the Professional Risk Managers’ International Association, and he also served as editor of Intelligent Risk, PRMIA’s quarterly member newsletter. He holds a BS from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and an MBA from Illinois Institute of Technology, Stuart School of Business.

Growth versus value: Itâs the ultimate argument among stock investors, and over long time periods, they duke it out for market dominance.
Those in the growth stock camp happily pay up for stocks with low but fast-growing earnings, with the expectation that earnings will accelerate in the years to come. Investors who tout value stocks seek overlooked and undervalued bargains and solid, reliable cash cows.
Investors sometimes think of growth-versus-value as an either/or proposition. Some might identify themselves as one or the other. But diversified portfolios often mix and match value with growth to potentially benefit from each, because one often outperforms the other for a while before the equation flips the other way. Some investors jump between growth and value when they think the wind is blowing in the right direction for one over the other.
Growth and value stocks have different characteristics, including performance histories and future expectations.
Growth stock characteristics include:
Here are some characteristics of value stocks:
Itâs difficult to measure exact performance over time for growth versus value, in part because many analysts use different metrics. One way is to compare indexes. For instance, FTSE Russell has a Russell 1000 Growth Index and a Russell 1000 Value Index. Although each index has experienced periods of outperformance and underperformance, growth really took off in the mid-2010s (see figure 1 below).

However, much of the performance discrepancy between growth and value came from varying sector weights within the indexes. Technologyâa sector heavily represented in growth indexesâenjoyed an explosive rally through much of the decade from 2010 to 2020. Technology stocks benefited not just from company innovation and growing demand, but also from historically low interest rates.
Soft rates kept borrowing costs low for growing tech companies, helping make their future earnings potential look very strong (lower costs help profit margins). That kind of outlook tends to favor growth, and gets back to the idea that investors pay up for stocks they believe offer vigorous future earnings power.
Just because a stock is considered âvalueâ today doesnât mean itâs always going to be. Same with growth. A value stock thatâs suddenly embraced by many analysts and investors can soon trade at a P/E multiple that no longer makes it a bargain.
Those Nifty Fifty stocks were once the biggest growth names in the market, but that was 40 years ago or more. Now some of those growth stocks behave more like value stocks, often paying big dividends and trading at lower P/E ratios.
Growth and value stocks both have their allure. A value stock can come cheap, but then be like an ugly duckling that suddenly grows some colorful feathers. A growth stock can provide quarter after quarter of earnings success, but at a price.
Most financial advisors recommend a mixture of growth and value shares in their clientsâ portfolios to take advantage of market ebbs and flows. Growth stocks tend to do great when the economy is humming along, but value stocks can be less volatile and not fall as far when recession hits.
So, how do you settle the age-old argument? Itâs a draw. Value and growth stocks have a place in balanced portfolios.