
Doug is a Chartered Alternative Investment Analyst who spent more than 20 years as a derivatives market maker and asset manager before “reincarnating” as a financial media professional a decade ago.
Before joining Britannica, Doug spent nearly six years managing content marketing projects for a dozen clients, including The Ticker Tape, TD Ameritrade’s market news and financial education site for retail investors. He has been a CAIA charter holder since 2006, and also held a Series 3 license during his years as a derivatives specialist.
Doug previously served as Regional Director for the Chicago region of PRMIA, the Professional Risk Managers’ International Association, and he also served as editor of Intelligent Risk, PRMIA’s quarterly member newsletter. He holds a BS from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and an MBA from Illinois Institute of Technology, Stuart School of Business.
Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree. They write new content and verify and edit content received from contributors.
Editorâs note: This article first appeared in Money Matters, a newsletter from Britannica Money, on July 22, 2026.
Back when I was writing for a major brokerage firm, gambling analogies were strictly forbidden, and for good reason. Investing, retirement savings, and even an active trading strategy should never be conflated with low-odds, the-house-always-wins betting. But sometimes itâs the best way to trigger a lightbulb moment, so here goes.
In blackjack, itâs you against the house. Hit the right number versus the âbenchmarkâ set by the dealer, and you win. The other players at the table have no bearing on the outcome of your stake. In poker, however, youâre playing against the other players at the table, and even a terrible hand can take the pot if you play it right.
We tend to think about retirement like poker. Every few months thereâs another survey telling us how much the average 40-year-old has saved or how many times our salary should already be sitting in a retirement account. Those numbers can be useful. But they also encourage us to keep score against everyone else, when the only score that really matters is whether our own plan is likely to get us where we want to go.
Every year, Vanguard publishes its How America Saves report. Itâs a treasure trove of data on retirement savings, participation rates, contribution levels, and investing behavior. But one table always seems to get the headlines: average retirement account balances by age.
For example, this yearâs report found that defined contribution plan participants ages 35 to 44 had an average balance of about $121,000, while those who are 55 to 64 averaged about $305,000. I suppose thatâs useful informationâif youâre decades behind your peers, you might be motivated to do something about it while thereâs still time.
But Iâve been following studies like this one for years, and it seems they always lead to the same conclusion: Weâre not saving enough for retirement. While there may be some truth to that, over time, it feels like the goalposts keep moving. No matter how much youâve saved, thereâs always another study suggesting youâll need more.
Thatâs where I think we start playing poker instead of blackjack. Itâs natural to compare ourselves with the averagesâor with siblings, coworkers, friends, and neighborsâbut their net worth isnât the number to beat. A comfortable retirement depends on whether your savings, spending, and retirement goals line up.
Four in 10 retirees left the workforce earlier than they had planned, according to the Employee Benefit Research Instituteâs 2025 Retirement Confidence Survey. Nearly 7 in 10 of those early retirees said circumstances beyond their control played a role.
How long will you live? What kind of health will you enjoy? When do you hope to retireâand will life agree to your plan? Plenty of retirements begin earlier or later than planned because of health issues, family obligations, or an unexpected job change. And do you plan to spend your days traveling, golfing, or spoiling the grandkids?
Granted, sometimes you really are competing with everyone elseâbut not because they have a bigger retirement account. If your dream is a waterfront condo in Naples, Florida, youâre competing with everyone else who wants one, tooâand there arenât enough to go around. Still, the benchmark isnât your neighborâs 401(k). Itâs the price of the retirement youâre trying to buy.
Thatâs why retirement calculators (such as Britannica Moneyâs) ask so many questions before they produce an answer. Theyâre not trying to predict the future. Theyâre helping you estimate what your version of retirement is likely to cost so you can decide whether youâre on pace to get there.
Poker players spend as much time watching everyone else at the table as they do looking at their own cards. Retirement planning should take the opposite approach. Here are three questions that can guide your retirement planning far more than any retirement benchmark ever could.
Play your own hand. The players around you might hit 21 three hands in a row, while others seem to bust every time. None of that changes the cards in front of you. Review your plan from time to time, make adjustments when life changes, and keep your focus on the only number that really matters: The cost of the retirement you want.