Starbucks seeks to support the farming communities it works with through a number of nongovernmental organizations with programs designed to strengthen economic and social development. The company also offers farmer loans, and in 2019 it made relief payments to its farmers in Guatemala, Nicaragua, El Salvador, and Mexico when coffee prices hit record lows. In addition, by 2021 the company had 10 farmer support centers that shared “open-source” agronomy practices with growers in coffee-producing countries around the world. The program has trained more than 200,000 farmers since the first center opened in Costa Rica in 2004.

Starbucks is often cited as an industry leader in paying above-market rates for its coffee beans, although these higher rates are usually paid to a broker and may or may not translate to higher profits for the farmers themselves. The company states that more than 99% of its beans are ethically sourced and has a commitment to reach 100%; it also aims to have 100% of its tea and cocoa ethically sourced. To this end, it employs its own set of economic and agricultural standards known as Coffee and Farmer Equity (C.A.F.E.) practices and acts in partnership with Conservation International to foster environmental sustainability. The company is also one of the largest purchasers of Fair Trade–certified coffee in the world, and a number of its blends are certified organic.

Despite its apparent commitment to buying ethically sourced coffee, Starbucks has faced allegations of purchasing from farms and plantations that use child labor and slave labor or that house workers in unsanitary conditions. In 2018 and 2019 two Starbucks C.A.F.E. plantations in Brazil were found to have “slavery-like” conditions, and an investigation in 2020 found children under the age of 13 were working on five Guatemalan farms that supply Starbucks.

Critics of the C.A.F.E. practices claim that the required farm inspections are too infrequent to protect farmworkers, as inspections can happen as infrequently as every two to three years, depending on factors such as the farm’s previous inspection scores. In addition, unlike for Fair Trade–certified coffee, Starbucks C.A.F.E. practices do not have a minimum guaranteed price for farmers, farms are not required to be small scale, and community development is not democratically administered by the farmers themselves. These facts have been used to argue that the C.A.F.E. practices are more to satisfy consumer consciences than to actually benefit coffee producers and alleviate poverty.