- Born:
- Nov. 16, 1938, Brooklyn, N.Y., U.S.
- Died:
- Jan. 23, 2002, Cambridge, Mass. (aged 63)
Robert Nozick
-
Who was Robert Nozick?
Robert Nozick (1938-2002) was an American philosopher known for his defense of libertarianism, as articulated in his book Anarchy, State, and Utopia (1974). This work defends the "minimal state" and critiques the social-democratic liberalism of John Rawls.
Nozick's entitlement theory of justice states that the distribution of holdings in a society is just only if everyone in that society is entitled to what he has. He argued that any distribution of holdings is just if it arises from a just distribution through legitimate means such as the appropriation of unowned things, voluntary transfer of ownership, or rectification of past injustices.
4 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What is Robert Nozick best known for in philosophy?
Robert Nozick was an American philosopher known for his defense of libertarianism, articulated in Anarchy, State, and Utopia (1974). This work defends the "minimal state," limited to protecting citizens against violence, theft, and fraud, against anarchism and leftist ideologies that advocate for a more extensive state.
Nozick's entitlement theory of justice argues that a distribution of holdings is just if everyone is entitled to what they possess, acquired through legitimate means such as appropriation, voluntary transfer, or rectification of past injustices. He opposed theories of justice based on patterns or historical circumstances, illustrating this with his "Wilt Chamberlain" argument, which posits that any distribution could be upset by ordinary transactions.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What book did Robert Nozick write that made him famous?
Robert Nozick is most famous for his book Anarchy, State, and Utopia, published in 1974. This work is a defense of libertarianism, advocating for a minimal state and critiquing the social-democratic liberalism of John Rawls. The book became a philosophical manifesto for the New Right, though Nozick wasn't entirely comfortable with this association. In it, Nozick presents his entitlement theory of justice, arguing that a distribution of holdings is just if it arises from a just distribution through legitimate means like voluntary transfer or rectification of past injustices.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What are the main ideas in Nozick’s book 'Anarchy, State, and Utopia'?
In Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Robert Nozick argues that only a minimal state is morally justified, acting as a "night watchman" to protect citizens from violence, theft, and fraud.
Nozick refutes anarchism, claiming a minimal state would arise naturally from people defending their rights in a "state of nature". He also argues against liberalism and leftist ideologies, stating that a more extensive state violates citizens' natural rights.
Nozick's entitlement theory of justice supports holdings distribution if acquired through just means like appropriation, voluntary transfer, or rectifying injustices. He uses the "Wilt Chamberlain" argument to critique patterned or historically-based justice theories, asserting they would impinge on individual liberty. Nozick sees the minimal state as a "framework for utopia," allowing diverse communities based on different justice theories.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How did Nozick's views on government differ from other philosophers like John Rawls?
Robert Nozick's libertarianism sharply contrasted with John Rawls' egalitarian liberalism. Nozick advocated for a minimal state, limited to protecting individuals' natural rights to life, liberty, and property, opposing state intervention for economic regulation or wealth redistribution.
Rawls, however, argued for a state with powers to ensure the least well-off citizens are as well-off as possible, within the bounds of basic rights and freedoms. Nozick critiqued Rawls' focus on patterned distributions, asserting that any distribution is just if derived from legitimate acquisition, voluntary transfer, or rectification of past injustices, regardless of inequality.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How have Robert Nozick's ideas influenced political philosophy today?
Robert Nozick's Anarchy, State, and Utopia (1974) defends libertarianism and critiques social-democratic liberalism, impacting political philosophy by advocating for a minimal state limited to protecting citizens against violence, theft, and fraud.
Nozick's entitlement theory, where individuals are entitled to their holdings if acquired through just means, challenges patterned or historically-based theories of distributive justice. His arguments, such as the "Wilt Chamberlain" argument, illustrate how enforcing patterned distributions may require intrusive infringements on individual liberty. Though hailed by the New Right, Nozick was not entirely comfortable with this association.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
Robert Nozick (born Nov. 16, 1938, Brooklyn, N.Y., U.S.—died Jan. 23, 2002, Cambridge, Mass.) was an American philosopher, best known for his rigorous defense of libertarianism in his first major work, Anarchy, State, and Utopia (1974). A wide-ranging thinker, Nozick also made important contributions to epistemology, the problem of personal identity, and decision theory.
Early life and career
Nozick was the only child of Max Nozick, a Russian immigrant and businessman, and Sophie Cohen Nozick. After attending public school in Brooklyn, Nozick enrolled at Columbia College, where he earned a bachelor’s degree in philosophy in 1959. He received a Ph.D. in philosophy at Princeton University in 1963, having written a dissertation on decision theory under Carl Hempel. He taught at Princeton (1962–65), Harvard University (1965–67), and Rockefeller University (1967–69); in 1969, when he was 30 years old, he returned to Harvard as one of the youngest full professors in the university’s history. At Harvard for the remainder of his teaching career, he was appointed Arthur Kingsley Porter Professor of Philosophy in 1985 and Joseph Pellegrino University Professor in 1998.
Anarchy, State, and Utopia
During his high school and college years, Nozick was a member of the student New Left and an enthusiastic socialist. At Columbia he helped to found a campus branch of the League for Industrial Democracy, a precursor of the Students for a Democratic Society. While in graduate school he read works by libertarian thinkers such as F.A. Hayek and Ludwig von Mises, and his political views began to change. His conversion to libertarianism culminated in 1974 with the publication of Anarchy, State, and Utopia, a closely argued and highly original defense of the libertarian “minimal state” and a critique of the social-democratic liberalism of his Harvard colleague John Rawls. Immediately hailed by conservative intellectuals, the work became a kind of philosophical manifesto of the New Right, though Nozick himself was not entirely comfortable with this association.
Justification of the minimal state
The main purpose of Anarchy, State, and Utopia is to show that the minimal state, and only the minimal state, is morally justified. By a minimal state Nozick means a state that functions essentially as a “night watchman,” with powers limited to those necessary to protect citizens against violence, theft, and fraud. By arguing that the minimal state is justified, Nozick seeks to refute anarchism, which opposes any state whatsoever; by arguing that no more than the minimal state is justified, Nozick seeks to refute modern forms of liberalism, as well as socialism and other leftist ideologies, which contend that, in addition to its powers as a night watchman, the state should have the powers to regulate the economic activities of citizens, to redistribute wealth in the direction of greater equality, and to provide social services such as education and health care.
Against anarchism, Nozick claims that a minimal state is justified because it (or something very much like it) would arise spontaneously among people living in a hypothetical “state of nature” through transactions that would not involve the violation of anyone’s natural rights. Following the 17th-century English philosopher John Locke, Nozick assumes that everyone possesses the natural rights to life, liberty, and property, including the right to claim as property the fruits or products of one’s labour and the right to dispose of one’s property as one sees fit (provided that in doing so one does not violate the rights of anyone else). Everyone also has the natural right to punish those who violate or attempt to violate one’s own natural rights. Because defending one’s natural rights in a state of nature would be difficult for anyone to do on his own, individuals would band together to form “protection associations,” in which members would work together to defend each other’s rights and to punish rights violators. Eventually, some of these associations would develop into private businesses offering protection and punishment services for a fee. The great importance that individuals would attach to such services would give the largest protection firms a natural competitive advantage, and eventually only one firm, or a confederation of firms, would control all the protection and punishment business in the community. Because this firm (or confederation of firms) would have a monopoly of force in the territory of the community and because it would protect the rights of everyone living there, it would constitute a minimal state in the libertarian sense. And because the minimal state would come about without violating anyone’s natural rights, a state with at least its powers is justified.
Against liberalism and ideologies farther left, Nozick claims that no more than the minimal state is justified, because any state with more extensive powers would violate the natural rights of its citizens. Thus the state should not have the power to control prices or to set a minimum wage, because doing so would violate the natural right of citizens to dispose of their property, including their labour, as they see fit. For similar reasons, the state should not have the power to establish public education or health care through taxes imposed on citizens who may wish to spend their money on private services instead. Indeed, according to Nozick, any mandatory taxation used to fund services or benefits other than those constitutive of the minimal state is unjust, because such taxation amounts to a kind of “forced labour” for the state by those who must pay the tax.