- Died:
- March 20, 1351, Sonda, Sindh [now in Pakistan]
- Title / Office:
- sultan (1325-1351), Delhi sultanate
Muḥammad ibn Tughluq
-
Who was Muḥammad ibn Tughluq?
Muḥammad ibn Tughluq, born around 1290 in Delhi, was the second sultan of the Tughluq dynasty (reigned 1325–51). He aimed to extend the Delhi sultanate's rule across the Indian subcontinent.
Known for his vast knowledge, he faced 22 rebellions during his reign and was considered severe towards his opponents. His policies included transferring the capital to Daulatabad, introducing monetary reforms, and agricultural initiatives like crop rotation and state farms.
However, his reign also saw the beginning of the decline of the sultanate, with the rise of independent states in the south. He died in 1351 in Sindh.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
When did Muḥammad ibn Tughluq rule the Delhi Sultanate?
Muḥammad ibn Tughluq, the second sultan of the Tughluq dynasty, ruled the Delhi sultanate from 1325 to 1351. During his reign, he aimed to extend the sultanate's reach across most of the Indian subcontinent.
Muḥammad implemented policies with severity, which led to a decline in his authority, particularly in the south. He attempted to establish a Muslim elite in the Deccan with a second capital at Daulatabad, but this ultimately failed when the Deccan Muslim aristocracy rejected Delhi's authority and established the Bahmanī sultanate in 1347.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What are some important things Muḥammad ibn Tughluq is known for?
Muḥammad ibn Tughluq, the second sultan of the Tughluq dynasty, ruled from 1325 to 1351. He is known for expanding the Delhi sultanate over most of the Indian subcontinent, but also for losing authority in the south due to misguided administrative decisions and harsh treatment of opponents.
Other notable events and policies include:
* Making Daulatabad a second capital in 1327 to control the wealthy Deccan region, though this strategy failed when trouble arose in the north.
* Introducing reforms to the monetary system and issuing coins of high quality; however, his attempt to introduce token currency failed.
* Increasing land tax in the Doab region between the Ganges and Yamuna rivers, which led to resistance and coincided with a severe drought.
* Being the first ruler to advance loans to villagers for recovery after a famine and establishing a department of agriculture to improve cropping patterns and irrigation.2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Why did Muḥammad ibn Tughluq move the capital from Delhi to Daulatabad?
Muḥammad ibn Tughluq moved the capital from Delhi to Daulatabad in 1327 to effectively control the Deccan region and Gujarat, gaining access to western and southern ports for overseas trade. He also aimed to settle Muslim nobles in the south and maintain control over them. Daulatabad's location offered a strategic advantage for trade and defense against the Mongols. However, this decision led to trouble in the north and rebellions, forcing the Sultan to move back to Delhi. Despite the initial intent, the move failed as the sultan lost control of South Indian possessions.
4 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What were some of the challenges and problems during his reign?
Muḥammad ibn Tughluq, the second sultan of the Tughluq dynasty, faced numerous challenges during his reign, which led to a decline in the Delhi sultanate. His misguided administrative decisions and harsh treatment of opponents caused him to lose authority in the south.
Some of the specific problems during his reign included:
* Rebellions broke out in the north, on the western border, and in Bengal.
* He was less successful against a Mongol invasion.
* The Muslim governor of Maʿbar declared independence, forming the sultanate of Madura.
* Hindu chiefs' rebellions led to the creation of new states like Vijayanagar.
* He lost control of south Indian possessions due to rebellions in Gulbarga, Warangal, and Daulatabad.
* An increase in land tax, combined with a severe drought, led to resistance from taxpayers.
* His introduction of token currency failed.
* He faced opposition from the Muslim divines, the ulamas, and the Sufis.2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How did Muḥammad ibn Tughluq’s rule affect the future of the Delhi Sultanate?
Muḥammad ibn Tughluq's reign in the Delhi Sultanate had a profound impact. His misguided administrative decisions and harshness towards opponents led to a decline in his authority, particularly in the south.
His efforts to establish a Muslim elite in the Deccan region and a second capital at Daulatabad ultimately failed when the Deccan Muslim aristocracy overthrew Delhi's rule, establishing the Bahmanī sultanate in 1347.
These challenges, coupled with rebellions and the loss of control over South Indian territories, significantly weakened the Delhi Sultanate. His successor, Fīrūz Shah Tughluq, did not attempt to regain the Deccan, further diminishing the sultanate's power. Overall, Muḥammad ibn Tughluq's reign marked the beginning of the decline of the Delhi Sultanate.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
Muḥammad ibn Tughluq (born c. 1290, Delhi, India—died March 20, 1351, Sonda, Sindh [now in Pakistan]) was the second sultan of the Tughluq dynasty (reigned 1325–51), who briefly extended the rule of the Delhi sultanate of northern India over most of the subcontinent. As a result of misguided administrative actions and unexampled severity toward his opponents, he eventually lost his authority in the south; at the end of his reign, the sultanate had begun to decline in power.
Life
Muḥammad was the son of the sultan Ghiyāth al-Dīn Tughluq. Very little is known of his childhood, but he apparently received a good education. He possessed an encyclopaedic knowledge of the Qurʾān, Muslim jurisprudence, astronomy, logic, philosophy, medicine, and rhetoric. In 1321–22 his father sent him against the city of Warangal in the Deccan, in which campaign, after initial reverses, he subdued the rebellious Hindu rajas. From his accession to the throne in 1325 until his death in 1351, Muḥammad contended with 22 rebellions, pursuing his policies consistently and ruthlessly. Ziyāʾ al-Dīn Baranī, his close companion and counsellor for 17 years, often advised him to abdicate, but Muḥammad disdainfully rejected his advice.
As his reign began, Muḥammad attempted, without much success, to enlist the services of the ʿulamāʾ, the Muslim divines, and the Sufis, the ascetic mystics. Failing to win the ʿulamāʾ over, he tried to curtail their powers, as some of his predecessors had, by placing them on an equal footing with other citizens. The Sultan wanted to use the Sufis’ prestigious position to stabilize his authority as ruler. Yet they had always refused any association with government and would not accept any grants or offices except under duress. Muḥammad tried every measure, conciliatory or coercive, to yoke them to his political wagon. Although he humiliated them, he could not break their opposition and succeeded only in dispersing them from the towns of northern India.
In the four pages of his so-called autobiography, Muḥammad’s only surviving literary work, he confesses that he had wavered from traditional orthodoxy to philosophic doubts and then found his way to a rational faith. To still his own doubts, as well as to counteract the opposition of the Muslim divines, he obtained from the titular caliph in Cairo a manshūr (patent of royalty) legitimizing his authority.
The transfer of the capital in 1327 to Deogir (now Daulatabad) was intended to consolidate the conquests in southern India by large-scale—in some cases forced—migration of the people of Delhi to Deogir. As an administrative measure it failed, but it had far-reaching cultural effects. The spread of the Urdu language in the Deccan may be traced to this extensive influx of Muslims. He introduced several reforms in the monetary system, and his coins, in design as well as in workmanship and purity of metal, excelled those of his predecessors. His introduction of token currency, coins of baser metal with the face value of silver coins, however, failed dismally.
A projected Khorāsān expedition (1327–28) that never materialized was intended to secure more defensible frontiers in the west. The Karajil (Garhwal-Kumaon) expedition (1329–30), an attempt to adjust the boundary dispute with the northern hill states then dominated by China, ended in disaster, but it was followed by an exchange of emissaries between China and Delhi. The conquest of Nagarkot in the foothills of the Himalayas in northwestern India was based on Muḥammad’s policy of establishing secure frontiers.
Between 1328 and 1329 the Sultan increased the land tax in the Doab—the land between the Ganges (Ganga) and Yamuna rivers—but the taxpayers resisted it, especially because a severe drought coincided. Muḥammad was the first ruler to introduce rotation of crops, establish state farms, and tend cultivation and improve artificial irrigation by establishing a department of agriculture. When famine broke out in northern India (1338–40), he moved his residence to Swargdawari to supervise famine relief measures himself.
Muḥammad’s last expedition, against the rebel Ṭaghī, ended with his death at Sonda in Sindh in 1351. He died with a smile on his face and verses of his own composition on his lips. In the words of a contemporary, “the Sultan was rid of the people and the people of the Sultan.”
Legacy
Sultan Muḥammad was among the most controversial and enigmatic figures of the 14th century. A dauntless soldier, he was tolerant in religion and was normally humane and humble, but these traits were vitiated at times by cruelty sometimes approaching the inhuman. He lived in constant conflict between faith and action, faith in the correctness of his policies and action in the means by which he sought to implement them. A born revolutionary, he desired to create a more equitable social order by making Islam a religion of service rather than a means of exploitation. This end, he believed, could be achieved only by a strong centralized authority based on justice and patronage of the poor, the learned, and the pious and on the suppression of rebellions mainly of the privileged classes in a tradition-ridden society.
All contemporary historians based their assessment of Muḥammad on his administrative measures, which were neither vicious nor visionary. They failed because of the harshness of the Sultan in executing them, the challenge they posed to the privileged classes, the general lethargy and conservatism of his subjects, and the expansion of the empire with which Muḥammad’s administrative machinery could not cope.
