- Died:
- April 16, 1859, Cannes (aged 53)
- Title / Office:
- Chamber of Deputies (1839-1848), France
- Notable Works:
- “Democracy in America”
- “The Old Regime and the Revolution”
- Subjects Of Study:
- French Revolution
- United States
- democracy
- Role In:
- Second Republic
Alexis de Tocqueville
-
Who was Alexis de Tocqueville?
Alexis de Tocqueville (1805–1859) was a French political scientist, historian, and politician, known for Democracy in America (1835–40), a study of the political and social system of the United States in the early 19th century.
Tocqueville, a civil servant, aimed to maintain civilization's standards amidst mass democracy. He studied the U.S. firsthand, resulting in a classic account of American civilization. He feared centralized government power and stressed the importance of educating democracy to foster dignity and good sense.
He admired American representative institutions and analyzed the press's power. Tocqueville foresaw the rise of the U.S. and Russia as world powers, contrasting their freedom and despotism. He also predicted that democracy would prioritize education for success over its intrinsic value.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What is Alexis de Tocqueville best known for writing?
Alexis de Tocqueville (1805–1859) is best known for writing Democracy in America, a four-volume analysis of the political and social system of the United States in the early 19th century.
During 1831 and 1832, Tocqueville and Beaumont spent nine months in the United States, which resulted in their joint book, On the Penitentiary System in the United States and Its Application in France (1833); Beaumont’s Marie; or, Slavery in the United States (1835), regarding the race problems in America; and the first part of Tocqueville’s Democracy in America (1835–40).
Tocqueville's Democracy in America analyzed the vitality, excesses, and potential future of American democracy. Above all, the work conveyed his message that a society could retain liberty in a democratic social order if properly organized.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What is 'Democracy in America' about?
Democracy in America, written by Alexis de Tocqueville and published in two parts (1835 and 1840), is a comprehensive analysis of the political and social system of the United States in the early 19th century.
De Tocqueville undertook this study to understand how to maintain societal standards and encourage innovation amidst the rise of mass democracy. Through observations and discussions, he aimed to identify the essentials of American society, particularly the equality of conditions, and to explore the vitality, excesses, and potential future of American democracy.
He also warned against the dangers of centralized government and the increasing political apathy of citizens, advocating for the education of democracy to foster dignity and good sense.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Why did Tocqueville travel to the United States?
Alexis de Tocqueville traveled to the United States in the early 1830s to study American society firsthand. As a French civil servant, he was concerned with preserving the standards and creativity of civilization amidst the rise of mass democracy.
Tocqueville and Beaumont spent nine months in the U.S., resulting in their joint book, On the Penitentiary System in the United States and Its Application in France (1833); Beaumont’s Marie; or, Slavery in the United States (1835), on America’s race problems; and the first part of Tocqueville’s Democracy in America (1835–40). His observations and discussions with eminent Americans led him to analyze the vitality, excesses, and potential future of American democracy, emphasizing equality of conditions and the importance of properly organizing society to retain liberty in a democratic social order.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How did Tocqueville's background influence his ideas?
Alexis de Tocqueville's background significantly shaped his thinking. As a great-grandson of statesman Chrétien de Malesherbes, a liberal aristocratic victim of the French Revolution, Tocqueville was influenced by his family's history and the values they embodied.
His early experiences during the Bourbon Restoration, coupled with the lectures of historian François Guizot, led him to believe in the inevitable decline of aristocratic privilege and the rise of social equality. The July Revolution of 1830 reinforced this conviction, leading him to study American democracy as a model for France's future.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What impact did Alexis de Tocqueville have on political thought and history?
Alexis de Tocqueville was a French political scientist, historian, and politician, known for Democracy in America, a study of the political and social system of the United States in the early 19th century.
Tocqueville was concerned with preserving standards within mass democracy. In Democracy in America, he analyzed American society and stressed how a well-organized society could maintain liberty within a democratic social order. He also realized the United States and Russia would become world powers, contrasting the freedom of the one and the despotism of the other.
His reputation grew after his death as European powers adjusted to universal suffrage. His work displayed strategies for preserving liberty and analyzing social tendencies.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
Alexis de Tocqueville (born July 29, 1805, Paris, France—died April 16, 1859, Cannes) was a political scientist, historian, and politician, best known for Democracy in America, 4 vol. (1835–40), a perceptive analysis of the political and social system of the United States in the early 19th century.
Early life
Tocqueville was a great-grandson of the statesman Chrétien de Malesherbes (1721–94), a liberal aristocratic victim of the French Revolution and a political model for the young Tocqueville. Almost diminutive in stature, acutely sensitive, and plagued by severe bouts of anxiety since childhood, he remained close to his parents throughout his life.
Despite a frail voice in a fragile body, distaste for the daily demands of parliamentary existence, and long periods of illness and nervous exhaustion, Tocqueville chose politics as his vocation and adhered to this choice until he was driven from office. His decision in favour of a public career was made with some assurance of success. His father was a loyal royalist prefect and in 1827 was made a peer of France by Charles X. At that time, young Tocqueville moved easily into government service as an apprentice magistrate. There he prepared himself for political life while observing the impending constitutional confrontation between the Conservatives and the Liberals, with growing sympathy for the latter. He was strongly influenced by the lectures of the historian and statesman François Guizot (1787–1874), who asserted that the decline of aristocratic privilege was historically inevitable. After the manner of Liberals under the autocratic regime of the restored Bourbon kings, Tocqueville began to study English history as a model of political development.
He entered public life in the company of a close friend who was to become his alter ego—Gustave de Beaumont. Their life histories are virtual mirror images. Of similar backgrounds and positions, they were companions in their travels in America, England, and Algeria, coordinated their writings, and ultimately entered the legislature together.
The July Revolution of 1830 that put the “citizen king” Louis-Philippe of Orléans on the throne was a turning point for Tocqueville. It deepened his conviction that France was moving rapidly toward complete social equality. Breaking with the older liberal generation, he no longer compared France with the English constitutional monarchy but compared it with democratic America. Of more personal concern, despite his oath of loyalty to the new monarch, his position had become precarious because of his family ties with the ousted Bourbon king. He and Beaumont, seeking to escape from their uncomfortable political situation, asked for and received official permission to study the uncontroversial problem of prison reforms in America. They also hoped to return with knowledge of a society that would mark them as especially fit to help mold France’s political future.
Visit to the United States
Tocqueville and Beaumont spent nine months in the United States during 1831 and 1832, out of which came first their joint book, On the Penitentiary System in the United States and Its Application in France (1833); Beaumont’s Marie; or, Slavery in the United States (1835), on America’s race problems; and the first part of Tocqueville’s Democracy in America (1835–40). On the basis of observations, readings, and discussions with a host of eminent Americans, Tocqueville attempted to penetrate directly to the essentials of American society and to highlight that aspect—equality of conditions—that was most relevant to his own philosophy. Tocqueville’s study analyzed the vitality, the excesses, and the potential future of American democracy. Above all, the work was infused with his message that a society, properly organized, could hope to retain liberty in a democratic social order.
The first part of Democracy in America won an immediate reputation for its author as a political scientist. During this period, probably the happiest and most optimistic of his life, Tocqueville was named to the Legion of Honour, the Academy of Moral and Political Sciences (1838), and the French Academy (1841). With the prizes and royalties from the book, he even found himself able to rebuild his ancestral chateau in Normandy. Within a few years his book had been published in England, Belgium, Germany, Spain, Hungary, Denmark, and Sweden. Although it was sometimes viewed as having been derived from politically biased sources, it was soon accorded the status of a classic in the United States.
In 1836 Tocqueville married Mary Mottely, an Englishwoman. Tocqueville spent the next four years working on the final portion of Democracy in America, which was published in 1840. Its composition took far longer, moved farther afield, and ended far more soberly than Tocqueville originally had intended. American society slid into the background, and Tocqueville attempted to complete a picture of the influence of equality itself on all aspects of modern society. France increasingly became his principal example, and what he saw there altered the tone of his work. He observed the curtailment of liberties by the Liberals, who had come to power in 1830, as well as the growth of state intervention in economic development. Most depressing to him was the increased political apathy and acquiescence of his fellow citizens in this rising paternalism. His chapters on democratic individualism and centralization in Democracy in America contained a new warning based on these observations. He argued that a mild, stagnant despotism was the greatest threat to democracy.
First political career
During this period Tocqueville fulfilled his lifelong ambition to enter politics. He lost his first bid for the Chamber of Deputies in 1837 but won election two years later. Eventually, Tocqueville built up an enormous personal influence in his constituency, winning subsequent elections by more than 70 percent of the vote and becoming president of his departmental council (a local representative body). In local politics his quest for preeminence was completely fulfilled, but his need for uncompromised dignity and independence deprived him of influence in the Chamber of Deputies for a much longer time. He was not able to follow the leadership of others, nor did his oratorical style win him quick recognition as a leader. As a result, he had no major legislative accomplishment to his credit during the reign of Louis-Philippe. His speech prophesying revolution only a few weeks before it took place in France in February 1848 (part of the wider Revolutions of 1848 that befell Europe that year) fell on deaf ears. The biting sketches of friend, foe, and even himself in his Recollections (1893) reflect his feeling of the general mediocrity of political leadership before and after 1848.