Duchampâs legacy and the questioning of the art object: 1950â70
The challenge to traditional media such as painting, which is a key feature of post-1945 art, took its impetus from the figure of Marcel Duchamp. One of the founding figures of the Dada movement from 1916 to about 1923, Duchamp had moved to New York in 1942. His most famous Dada gesture had been the ready-made, the elevation of a manufactured mass-produced object to the status of art simply by virtue of the addition of the artistâs signature and a title. Fountain, the retitled urinal of 1917, was the most notorious and deliberately provocative of these objects. The fact that Duchamp did not himself fabricate the objects but simply chose them gave them a quasi-philosophical, iconoclastic edge, and that was to stimulate a wholesale interrogation of artâs traditional status during the 1950s and 1960s. The ready-made established an entire genre within postwar art.
American Neo-Dada: Cage, Rauschenberg, and Johns
Duchamp was an essentially underground presence in New York City in the early 1950s, but his ideas were taken up by a small band of admirers. Among these was the avant-garde composer John Cage, whose 4â33â of 1952, consisting of three movements of silence, might be regarded as a form of musical ready-made in that the members of the audience for the piece are required to adjust their expectations from experiencing âmusicâ in the conventional sense to being attentive to the sounds around them. Cageâs emphasis on the role of the spectator here was also a legacy from Duchamp. In a lecture of 1957 entitled âThe Creative Act,â Duchamp asserted that the spectator effectively âcompletesâ the work of art, and his fundamentally anti-Modernist view, which downplayed the self-sufficiency of the aesthetic object in favor of contingent considerations such as the spectatorâs viewpoint, became an article of faith for two highly innovatory New York City-based artists, Robert Rauschenberg and Jasper Johns.
Both Rauschenberg and Johns were close friends of Cage. Indeed, Rauschenberg had painted all-white canvases in 1951, which may well have inspired Cageâs artistic tabula rasa 4â33â. By the mid-1950s Rauschenberg had made a radical shift in his art. Partly inspired by the so-called Merz collages of the German Dadaist Kurt Schwitters, which made use of scraps of wastepaper and dustbin scavengings, Rauschenberg started to paste together heterogeneous collections of printed matterâsuch as newspaper photographs, commercial packaging, and comic-strip illustrationsâtreating the picture surface as, in the critic Leo Steinbergâs terms, a âflatbedâ on which to pin images rather than a picture surface to be unified according to Modernist criteria. In many ways Rauschenbergâs innovation was an opening onto the fast-approaching Pop aesthetic of the late 1950s (see below), but the mid-1950s also saw Rauschenberg adapting the Duchampian ready-made to create some of the first assemblagesâobjects that partook of aspects of both painting and sculptureâas in the case of the notorious Bed (1955), consisting of the artistâs own pillow and sheets stretched across wood supports, hoisted vertically, and daubed with paints in an ironic nod toward Abstract Expressionism. Works such as this engendered the short-lived critical label âNeo-Dada.â
Rauschenbergâs assemblages represent a radically new post-Duchampian use of media in postwar art. It was Johns, however, who pushed the idea of the ready-made into some of its most interesting new directions. His painting Flag (1954â55) took the predesigned format of the American flag as its subject but used it as a pretext for a display of painterly dexterity that seemed to comment ironically, once again, on Abstract Expressionism. Flag also posed a Duchampian philosophical conundrum: was it a painting or a flag? In a further departure, another key Johns work was the sculpture Painted Bronze (Ale Cans) of 1960. The work consists of two casts taken from beer cans, standing side by side on a plinth. By turning the Duchampian ready-made back into art (via the time-honored process of bronze casting), Johns implicitly declared items from consumer culture to be worthy of artistic attention. In the late 1950s and the â60s this attitude became widespread within the Pop art movement.
Art and consumerism: French and Italian art in the 1950s
The way in which Johns and Rauschenberg pioneered the incorporation of consumerist iconography into art was undoubtedly in line with the American consumer boom of the period. Such processes were also reflected in European art. The French Nouveau RĂ©aliste (âNew Realistâ) group was of central importance, its most prominent members being Yves Klein, Arman (Armand Fernandez), Jean Tinguely, and Daniel Spoerri. The group initially coalesced around a manifesto written by the critic Pierre Restany that asserted that since easel painting was dead, a new embrace of reality was called for. In many ways Restanyâs manifesto represented a long-overdue French response to the implications of the Duchampian ready-made, and Arman produced a number of works commenting wryly on the rise of commodity culture. In his Accumulations series he filled boxes with identical mass-produced objects in various states of decay. These existed in dialectical counterpoint to his Poubelles (âTrash Cansâ), consisting of transparent containers filled with garbage.
By far the most charismatic of the Nouveau RĂ©alistes was Klein, an artist whose interest in consumerism intersected very distinctively with his interest in preserving a messianic or spiritualized role for the artist. In the mid-1950s Klein produced a series of Monochromes in a color he named International Klein Blue, a variant of ultramarine blue that he patented as his own. Klein claimed that his Monochromes were imbued with a spiritual essence. When in 1957 he sold some of these identical canvases at varying prices (determined by him) at an exhibition in Milan, he asserted that the price variation was because his buyers had been variously attuned to the âpictorial sensitivityâ locked in his works. This seemingly ironic attitude to the interface between art as a commodity and art as a locus of spiritual values informed Kleinâs other protoperformances in 1959â60. His most famous performances, however, were the Anthropometries of the Blue Age, performed in Paris in 1960, in which Klein, wearing a tuxedo, instructed several naked female models to act as his âliving paintbrushes,â imprinting their paint-smeared bodies onto enormous sheets of paper placed on the floor.
Kleinâs showmanship stands in an interesting relation to the work of Italian artist Piero Manzoni, who produced materialist counterpropositions to his more spiritually elevated gestures. Based in Milan, Manzoni partly inherited his irreverent attitude to aesthetic protocols from Lucio Fontana, an artist who had developed a peculiarly Italian version of Informel painting (originally a Parisian movement that rejected the geometry of Cubism for more-spontaneous expression) in the early 1950s, puncturing and slashing his picture surfaces (as in the Spatial Concept series). In 1957â1961/62 Manzoni produced a series of what he called Achromes, consisting of assemblages of unlikely objects such as bread rolls, mummified in a uniformly colorless coating of kaolin. About the same time, he carried out performances paralleling those of Klein that involved a starker meditation on his own physical identity. They included Artistâs Breath, works consisting of balloons filled with the artistâs âdivine pneuma.â Attached to wooden bases, they poignantly deflated. Most notoriously, Manzoni produced cans of Merda dâartista (âArtistâs Shitâ) in 1961. Related once again to Duchampâs antiaesthetic ready-mades (notably his urinal), those works presented wry commentaries on the commodification of the artistâs most elementary produce. As such, they adopted a more ambivalent attitude to consumerism than that revealed in the full-blown Pop art that was emerging in Britain and the United States.