Colonial Americas
North America
Painting in the Dutch and English colonies of North America reflected generally the portrait styles of the mother countries, though with a note of provinciality. In the late 17th and early 18th centuries the Dutch colony of New Amsterdam (now New York) had painters whose names today are forgotten. Their work lives on, however, and is signified by names such as the Master of the De Peyster Boy. Gustavus Hesselius, Swedish born, was painting in Maryland, and Jeremiah TheĂŒs, a Swiss, was at work in South Carolina. Peter Pelham and John Smibert arrived from England and in the second quarter of the 18th century were painting portraits in Boston, Massachusetts. These two self-taught itinerant artists were succeeded by John Wollaston and Joseph Blackburn. Robert Feke, an American-born painter, realized his forms more solidly and with greater originality than his predecessors had. Another American-born painter, John Singleton Copley, worked in Boston until 1774, when he went to live permanently in England, and was responsible for the finest painting produced in the American colonies. Benjamin West, another important figure in the history of American painting, was born in Pennsylvania but settled in London in 1763, where he became the second president of the Royal Academy. Although domiciled in London, he helped to mold the styles of two generations of American painters.
Central Europe
In central Europe the Mannerist tradition remained dominant until the Thirty Yearsâ War (1618â48), particularly in Bohemia and Bavaria, where Italian influence was perhaps strongest.
The Rubensian Baroque became dominant after mid-century, and here the lead was taken by Silesia and Bohemia. Michael Willmann, originally from Königsberg (modern Kaliningrad) on the southeastern Baltic coast, developed a highly charged, emotional Baroque style, based on Rubens, at LubiÄ ĆŒ (modern Dorf Leubus, northwest of WrocĆaw) from 1661 to 1700 and at Prague after 1700. In Karel Ć krĂ©ta Ć otnovoskĂœ, Bohemia possessed a painter of significant stature; his somber portraits and religious scenes are filled with a deeply serious mystical fervor. The frescoes by Johann Michael Rottmayr in the castle of Vranov in Moravia (1695) and in Breslau (now WrocĆaw; 1704â06) constitute a prelude to the great development of Baroque painting in the Habsburg domains. There the vigorous and extremely colorful frescoes are closely integrated with the architecture. The vast majority of the best central European Baroque painting outside portraiture is monumental in scale, and the concept of the Gesamtkunstwerk (âtotal work of artâ)âwhere painting, sculpture, and architecture are combined together into a single, unified, and harmonious ensembleâis of overwhelming importance.
Painting in Austria flourished, and Franz Anton Maulbertsch is arguably the greatest painter of the 18th century in central Europe. The vast majority of his brilliant fresco cycles are located in relatively inaccessible areas of Bohemia, Moravia, and northern Hungary. But the mystical intensity of his religious scenes and the joyous abandon of his secular subjects form a triumphant closing chapter to 18th-century central European painting. Maulbertschâs last frescoes at Strahov, Prague (1794), reveal, nevertheless, the impact of the Neoclassicism that descended in the last decades on all Austrian painters, including Trogerâs pupil Martin Knoller. But Austrian monumental painting remained fully Baroque in the hands of Daniel Gran, Paul Troger, and BartholomĂ€us Altomonte; and it was not until the latter part of the century that the Rococo made its impact.
During the first four decades of the 18th century, Bohemian Baroque painting developed almost independently of Vienna, where the Habsburg rulers of Bohemia had their capital. The impetuous work of Jan Petr Brandl and the powerful realism of the portraitist Jan KupeckĂœ, who worked in Rome, Venice, Vienna, and NĂŒrnberg, always remained Bohemian in spirit. The frescoes of Wenzel Lorenz Reiner, however, show more Italian influence. One of the few important Baroque frescoes of the second half of the century is that by Jan LucaĆĄ Kracker in St. Nicholas, MalĂĄ Strana (âLesser Quarterâ), Prague. The influence of Bohemian Baroque painting is frequently underestimated. Apart from Vienna and the surrounding area, it was dominant in Silesia and strong later in the century in Franconia.
After the death of Cosmas Damian Asam in 1739, Johann Baptist Zimmermann became the most important fresco painter in the Munich area; his lyrical handling of pale colors is typical of the Rococo period. Christian Wink continued to paint in the same style until the close of the century. In Georg Desmarées the court at Munich gained a painter in whose Rococo portraits there is more than a hint of decadence.
The center of south German painting had by the late 1730s shifted from Munich to Augsburg in Swabia, where Johann Georg BermĂŒller became the director of the Academy in 1730; but his frescoes, as well as those of Franz Joseph Spiegler and Gottfried Bernhard Goetz, are perhaps more representative of the Late Baroque than the Rococo. The frescoes of MatthĂ€us GĂŒnther, who became director of the Augsburg Academy in 1762, show a steady evolution from his early Baroque compositions, through the much lighter asymmetrical Rococo compositions, to the strongly sculptural quality of his late works, which reveal the onset of Neoclassicism.
In Franconia and the middle Rhineland the most important painters were Johann Zick and Carlo Carlone. Zickâs frescoes at WĂŒrzburg (1749) had not been entirely successful, and in 1750 he was supplanted by Tiepolo; but at Bruchsal he produced one of the most brilliant series of Rococo frescoes in Germany (now destroyed). His son Januarius began painting in the Rococo style but under the influence of Anton Raphael Mengs produced some late frescoes that were strongly classical.
The French tastes of Frederick I of Prussia at Berlin led him in 1710 to summon Antoine Pesne to court, where Pesne continued for the remainder of his life to paint in an entirely French Rococo style. The homely intimacy of the paintings of Daniel Chodowiecki, however, have a sensitivity and refinement more comparable to Chardinâs.
Saxony under Augustus III produced few painters of real importance except Mengs, who rapidly turned from the Rococo to the Neoclassicism propounded by the influential art historian and classical archaeologist Johann Winckelmann.
Poland
King WĆadysĆaw IV Vasa (reigned 1632â48) assembled an important collection of Italian and Flemish Baroque paintings, but these promising developments were cut short by the destruction of the Swedish Wars in the middle of the 17th century. Under John III Sobieski (reigned 1674â96) there was a considerable revival, and, although two of the painters active in PolandâClaude Callot and Michelangelo Palloniâwere foreign-born and foreign-trained, domestic talent flowered with the work of Jerzy Eleuter Szymonowicz-Siemiginowski and Jan Tretko. In 1697 the crowns of Poland and Saxony were united under Augustus II, and he and his son Augustus III ruled over Poland until 1763. During this period, Polish painting formed part of the Saxon tradition, but during the reign of the last king of Poland, StanisĆaw II August Poniatowski (reigned 1764â95), Warsaw quickly became a center of European importance. Although inclined to Neoclassicism in architecture, StanisĆawâs taste in painting was more conservative. Accordingly it is the late Rococo portraits of Marcello Bacciarelli that are particularly important. A nephew and pupil of Canaletto, Bernardo Bellotto, settled in Warsaw in 1767 and executed for StanisĆaw the great series of 26 views of the city that were intended to hang in the Royal Castle.
Russia
The Baroque in Russia was imported from western Europe and made little impact outside court circles. Indeed the traditional production of icons for the Orthodox church by artists of the Novgorod and Moscow schools continued throughout the Baroque period. Nevertheless the foundation of St. Petersburg (1703) by Peter I the Great marked the beginning of the substitution of Western influence for Byzantine, an important change. During Peterâs reign foreign painters began to go to Russia in increasing numbers; conversely, groups of young Russians were sent to Italy, France, Holland, and England to study painting. Western influence determined the character of Russian painting for more than two centuries.
The art of Peterâs age shows almost no trace of Byzantine influence. Only in iconography did the old style persist for some time. Early in the 18th century, religious painting began to give way to secular painting, and the church prohibition of sculpture became ineffective. Dmitry Levitsky stands out as the only important Russian painter of the 18th century to work in the Western style.
Further westernizing occurred under the empress Elizabeth (reigned 1741â62), who had French tastes. A great number of vast and luxurious Rococo-style palaces were built, and painting was primarily concerned with their interior decorationâceilings and walls. The work was carried on chiefly by Italians and Frenchmen.
In 1757 the Academy of Fine Arts was founded in St. Petersburg, and foreign artistsâmostly Frenchâwere invited to direct the new school. They trained some remarkable domestic portraitists, such as Ivan Argunov, Anton Losenko, and Fyodor Rokotov. Their works reflected the ceremonial character of Elizabethâs tastes and showed little evidence of native Russian sensibility.
Scandinavia
In the 17th century, Scandinavian painting derived from traditions of the Low Countries and northern Germany. The works of art carried off as loot from Prague by Swedish soldiers during the Thirty Yearsâ War might conceivably have broadened the outlook of Swedes at home, but the best of them were taken to Rome by Queen Christina when she abdicated in 1654. A generation later, under the influence of the fashionable Venetian pastelist Rosalba Carriera, a school of Rococo portraitists flourished in Scandinavia. One such portraitist was Carl Gustav Pilo, who, though trained in Stockholm, executed many frankly Venetian portraits during his years as court painter in Copenhagen. Another was Lorentz Pasch the Younger, who trained under Pilo in Copenhagen, although he subsequently worked mainly in Sweden. Other painters of Swedish origin were Alexander Roslin, who worked throughout Europe, and Georg DesmarĂ©es, who settled in Bavaria. The Scandinavian Rococo has a distinctive flavor that is also detectable in the work of two important miniaturists of the period, Niclas Lafrensen and Cornelius Höyer. At the close of the century the paintings of Jens Juel in Denmark bridge the transition from Rococo to Neoclassicism.

