Toward the nouveau roman
The popular literary event of 1954 was Bonjour tristesse (âHello, Sadnessâ; Eng. trans. Bonjour Tristesse). Published when its author, Françoise Sagan (pseudonym of Françoise Quoirez), was only 19 years old, this novel of adolescent love was written with âclassicalâ restraint and a tone of cynical disillusionment and showed the persistence of traditional form in the preferred fictions of the novel-reading public. The Naturalist novel survived in the work of Henri Troyat and others, while its assumptions about the role of the author and the nature of fictional ârealityâ continued to be taken for granted by a host of novelists and their readers.
These assumptions, challenged in the interwar years in the Joycean novel, had already found opposition in the prose fictions of Samuel Beckett, Joyceâs disciple and fellow Irishman, who published his first major text in French in 1951. Molloy (Eng. trans. Molloy) was the first of a trilogy exploring the constitution of the individual subject in discursive form, setting out the framing limits of identity constituted by language, history, social institutions, family, and the forms of storytelling (the other two volumes in the trilogy are Malone meurt [1951; Malone Dies] and LâInnommable [1953; The Unnameable]). As the century progressed, it became increasingly clear that Beckettâs work was seminal in the understanding of the material operations of writing: where writing comes from, how words work, and the extent to which all individuals live in language.
In the mid-1950s, however, critical attention was focused on the group dubbed the nouveaux romanciers, or new novelists: Alain Robbe-Grillet, Claude Simon, Nathalie Sarraute, Michel Butor, and Robert Pinget. Marguerite Duras (Marguerite Donnadieu) is sometimes added to the list, though not with her approval. The label covered a variety of approaches, but, as theorized in Robbe-Grilletâs Pour un nouveau roman (1963; Towards a New Novel), it implied generally the systematic rejection of the traditional framework of fictionâchronology, plot, characterâand of the omniscient author. In place of these conventions, the writers offer texts that demand more of the reader, who is presented with compressed, repetitive, or only partially explained events from which to read a meaning that will not, in any case, be definitive. In Robbe-Grilletâs La Jalousie (1957; Jealousy), for example, the narratorâs suspicions of his wifeâs infidelity are never confirmed or denied, but the interest of the writing is in conveying their obsessive quality, achieved by the replacement of a chronological narrative with the insistent repetition of details or events. Durasâs Moderato cantabile (1958; Eng. trans. Moderato Cantabile) favors innovative stylistic structuring over conventional characterization and plot, her purpose not to tell a story but to use the play of form to represent the movements of desireâcomplex, ambiguous, and disruptive.
The nouveau roman (French: ânew novelâ) was open to influence from works being written abroad, notably by William Faulkner, and from the cinema. Both Robbe-Grillet and Duras contributed to the nouvelle vague, or New Wave, style of filmmaking. The nouveau roman was taken up by the literary theorist Jean Ricardou and promulgated by him through the avant-garde critical journal Tel Quel. (Founded in 1960 by Philippe Sollers and other writers, Tel Quel reflects the transformation and politicization of Parisian and international intellectual modes in that decade.) Its scope narrowed over the years, and texts written in this mode were increasingly concerned with emphasizing their status as language games divorced from the real.
Theatrical experiments
In the 1940s and early â50s, drama found immediate subject matter in the overt clash of politics, ethics, and philosophies, public and personal, that were the substance of everyday life. Jean Anouilhâs many plays (exemplified by Antigone [1944; Eng. trans. Antigone]) are lucid, classical moralities, showing that there is a price to be paid for loyalty to people and beliefs. Henry de Montherlantâs historical dramas explored the heroic inconsistency of human behavior and the fascination of secular and religious idealism. Sartreâs expressed aim for his theater throughout the 1940s and ÊŸ50s was to show systems of values in conflict. From Les Mouches (produced 1943; The Flies), written for a France suffering Nazi oppression, to Les SĂ©questrĂ©s dâAltona (1959; The Condemned of Altona, also published as Altona), staged when France had become the oppressor in Algeria, his work gives form to the conflicting imperatives of personal survival and collective responsibility and the impossible choices set for the revolutionary by the competing discourses of family, religion, nation, and class.
This was an outstanding moment for the French stage. At the same time, government policy to provide state financial aid after the war led to the encouragement of great drama in the provinces (the Avignon Festival, founded by the great director Jean Vilar in 1947 to reach a younger public with more vibrant and modern acting and staging techniques) and the establishment of remarkable and innovative theater companies in Paris, such as the Théùtre National Populaire and the Compagnie Jean-Louis BarraultâMadeleine Renaud. The work and the theories of Jarry, Cocteau, and Artaud now began to bear their fruit. The plays of Anouilh and, to a lesser extent, those of Sartre still conveyed their intentions effectively from the authorâs script. Playwrights such as Jean Genet, EugĂšne Ionesco, Arthur Adamov, and Samuel Beckett focused to a great degree on the realization of text in performance. Though Genetâs Les Bonnes (The Maids) appeared in 1947 and Ionescoâs La Cantatrice chauve (The Bald Soprano) in 1949, public recognition of the new theater did not come until 1953, with Roger Blinâs production of Beckettâs En attendant Godot (1952; Waiting for Godot). (Blin is notable for his early presentation of plays by Beckett, Genet, and other important dramatists.) Their antecedents as diverse as the fool of Shakespearean drama and the tramp of silent comedy, Vladimir and Estragon are locked together in lyrical, violent, and trivial exchanges that model the devastating absurdity of latter-day Western humanism in a highly stylized dramatic form that brings together musical composition, high tragedy, pantomime, and knockabout farce. Recognition, when it came, certainly answered fully Artaudâs requirement for a theater that would shock its spectators into awareness of the darkness that shaped their world. Le Balcon (1956; The Balcony), Genetâs violently erotic representation of the spectacular fascination of power and its corrupting effect on revolutionary impulses, waited two years before the censor would admit it to the stage. Les NĂšgres (1958; The Blacks), less visual in its obscenity, was no more careful of the audienceâs sensibilities, tearing apart the verbal and social discourses that create and sustain racial oppression.