Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt

…to obtain an abortion (Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt [2016]).

…writing the majority opinion in Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt (2016), which struck down a Texas law imposing restrictions on abortion clinics and doctors, and dissenting from the Court’s decision not to block enforcement of a Texas law that effectively banned abortions after six weeks of pregnancy (2021). He also…

…by a 5–3 vote in Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, the court invalidated two provisions of a 2013 Texas law that had imposed strict requirements on abortion clinics in the state, purportedly in the interest of protecting women’s health. The court ruled that the two provisions placed an “impermissible obstacle”…

And in Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt (2016), in which the majority struck down a state regulation of abortion providers as imposing an “undue burden” on a woman’s right to choose to terminate her pregnancy, Roberts joined another dissent by Alito that criticized the majority opinion as…

In Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt (2016), the Court invoked its decision in Casey to strike down two provisions of a Texas law requiring that abortion clinics meet the standards of ambulatory surgical centers and that doctors performing abortions have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital.…

Whole Women’s Health v. Hellerstedt 2016 Found that provisions of a Texas law requiring that physicians who perform abortions have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital and that facilities at abortion clinics be equivalent to ambulatory surgical centers amounted to an “undue burden” on access…