Diagram illustrating Brownian motion, showing red and brown circles representing particles above and below a blue wavy line, with many small gray dots symbolizing atoms.

Albert Einstein's Theory of Brownian Motion

Learn about Albert Einstein's theory of Brownian motion and how he derived the size of atoms.
© MinutePhysics (A Britannica Publishing Partner)
  • © American Chemical Society (A Britannica Publishing Partner)
    A snowflake starts as a dust grain floating in a cloud.
  • Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.
    Learn about phytoplankton's role as the oxygen-producing foundation of many marine food chains.
  • Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.
    Love can be a dangerous game.
  • Courtesy of Northwestern University (A Britannica Publishing Partner)
    Learn about gravitational waves and how scientists in 2015 first directly detected them.
  • © Behind the News (A Britannica Publishing Partner)
    An overview of gravitational waves, including the announcement of their discovery.
  • Description of Albert Einstein's theory of relativity as a theory about what is absolute and not relative.
  • A brief description and history of Albert Einstein's special theory of relativity.

Transcript

One thing that's astounding about Einstein's publications in 1905 is that they spanned such a large range of physics. After illuminating the quantum nature of light by explaining the photoelectric effect in March, April saw Einstein turn to something apparently more mundane-- particles suspended in fluids. In particular, if you look at tiny particles in water or dust motes in the air, you'll see that they jitter about in a very odd and random way.

That is, it appears odd and random unless you believe that the air or water itself is made up of even smaller particles called atoms or molecules, which just bounce off each other according to very simple rules. This is called Brownian motion, despite the fact that botanist Brown wasn't the first to discover it. And similarly, Einstein wasn't the first to describe it mathematically.

But he did draw the conclusion that the mathematical description of Brownian motion is evidence for the existence of atoms, even if you can't see them directly. And then he cleverly derived how big atoms should be based on how much the Brownian particles move. That's like measuring the size of a penguin just by looking at how icebergs jiggle. Talk about cold and calculating.

Last Modification: