What is a wildcat strike?

A wildcat strike is a work stoppage initiated by employees without their union's consent, often violating collective bargaining agreements. The term 'wildcat' signifies unpredictability and uncontrollability, as perceived by employers and the media. These strikes challenge employer authority by disrupting operations without warning, preventing preemptive actions like threats or negotiations. Wildcat strikes are valuable when a small number of workers can have a large impact, such as in transport or manufacturing. They demonstrate worker sentiment and apply pressure during deadlocked negotiations. Wildcat strikes can create issues for unions, challenging their authority and undermining bargaining relationships, potentially forcing unions to condemn their members' actions. However, these strikes often have some level of support from lower-level union officials.

How is a wildcat strike different from an ordinary labor strike?

A wildcat strike is a work stoppage initiated by employees without the approval of their union. These strikes often violate collective bargaining agreements. In contrast, an ordinary labor strike is a collective refusal to work under the conditions required by employers. Wildcat strikes can be very effective because they don't allow employers to prepare by making threats to workers or hiring replacements. However, they can cause problems for unions, challenging their authority and undermining the negotiation process. Despite this, wildcat strikes often receive some level of support from local union officers.

Why might workers choose to start a wildcat strike?

A wildcat strike is a work stoppage initiated by employees without their union's consent, often violating collective bargaining agreements. Workers might choose this action when the impact of their strike can have an immediate and disproportionate impact, especially in sectors like transport, manufacturing, or construction. These strikes demonstrate strong feelings on an issue or apply pressure when management is uncooperative during negotiations. Wildcat strikes can create problems for unions, challenging their authority and undermining the negotiation process. However, these strikes often have some degree of support from lower-level union officials.

Are wildcat strikes legal, and what consequences can result from them?

A wildcat strike is a work stoppage employees undertake without their union's consent. While not necessarily illegal, they often breach collective bargaining agreements. Employers and the state usually view strikes as a challenge to their authority. Penalties for wildcat strikes can include termination or suspension, depending on the specific contract and labor laws. Unions might also face difficulties because wildcat strikes challenge the authority of the national union and its leaders. However, lower-level union officials may sanction wildcats to aid the workplace union's strength and cohesion.

How can wildcat strikes impact negotiations between workers and employers?

A wildcat strike is a work stoppage initiated by employees without their union's consent, potentially violating collective bargaining agreements. These strikes can significantly impact negotiations by creating bargaining leverage through surprise and unpreparedness, leaving employers little room to preempt the action. The effectiveness of wildcat strikes is particularly evident in sectors where the impact is immediate and disproportionate to the number of workers involved, such as transport, construction, and manufacturing. However, wildcat strikes can cause problems for unions, challenging their authority and undermining the negotiation process, potentially forcing unions to condemn their members' actions.

wildcat strike

Introduction References & Edit History Related Topics

Quick Facts

Related Topics:: strike

See all related content

wildcat strike

industrial relations

Written by

Gregor Gall

Fact-checked by

Britannica Editors

History

Top Questions

What is a wildcat strike?
A wildcat strike is a work stoppage initiated by employees without their union's consent, often violating collective bargaining agreements. The term 'wildcat' signifies unpredictability and uncontrollability, as perceived by employers and the media.

These strikes challenge employer authority by disrupting operations without warning, preventing preemptive actions like threats or negotiations. Wildcat strikes are valuable when a small number of workers can have a large impact, such as in transport or manufacturing. They demonstrate worker sentiment and apply pressure during deadlocked negotiations.

Wildcat strikes can create issues for unions, challenging their authority and undermining bargaining relationships, potentially forcing unions to condemn their members' actions. However, these strikes often have some level of support from lower-level union officials.
3 Britannica Sources
Created from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
How is a wildcat strike different from an ordinary labor strike?
A wildcat strike is a work stoppage initiated by employees without the approval of their union. These strikes often violate collective bargaining agreements. In contrast, an ordinary labor strike is a collective refusal to work under the conditions required by employers.

Wildcat strikes can be very effective because they don't allow employers to prepare by making threats to workers or hiring replacements. However, they can cause problems for unions, challenging their authority and undermining the negotiation process. Despite this, wildcat strikes often receive some level of support from local union officers.
3 Britannica Sources
Created from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
Why might workers choose to start a wildcat strike?
A wildcat strike is a work stoppage initiated by employees without their union's consent, often violating collective bargaining agreements.

Workers might choose this action when the impact of their strike can have an immediate and disproportionate impact, especially in sectors like transport, manufacturing, or construction. These strikes demonstrate strong feelings on an issue or apply pressure when management is uncooperative during negotiations.

Wildcat strikes can create problems for unions, challenging their authority and undermining the negotiation process. However, these strikes often have some degree of support from lower-level union officials.
3 Britannica Sources
Created from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
How do unions usually respond to wildcat strikes?
A wildcat strike is a work stoppage that employees undertake without their union's consent. Unions typically face problems with wildcat strikes because they challenge the authority of the union and its leadership, as strike proposals must pass to gain authorization and legitimacy under the union's constitution.

When union members stage a wildcat strike, they contravene the use of negotiation, conciliation, mediation, and possibly arbitration to resolve grievances. In this situation, unions are often forced to condemn their own members’ actions because these actions are viewed to have undermined the legitimacy of the bargaining relationship with the employer. However, most wildcats will be sanctioned in some way by the lower level of a union because these union officers understand the importance of such collective mobilization for aiding the strength and cohesion of the workplace union.
3 Britannica Sources
Created from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
Are wildcat strikes legal, and what consequences can result from them?
A wildcat strike is a work stoppage employees undertake without their union's consent. While not necessarily illegal, they often breach collective bargaining agreements.

Employers and the state usually view strikes as a challenge to their authority. Penalties for wildcat strikes can include termination or suspension, depending on the specific contract and labor laws. Unions might also face difficulties because wildcat strikes challenge the authority of the national union and its leaders. However, lower-level union officials may sanction wildcats to aid the workplace union's strength and cohesion.
3 Britannica Sources
Created from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
How can wildcat strikes impact negotiations between workers and employers?
A wildcat strike is a work stoppage initiated by employees without their union's consent, potentially violating collective bargaining agreements.

These strikes can significantly impact negotiations by creating bargaining leverage through surprise and unpreparedness, leaving employers little room to preempt the action. The effectiveness of wildcat strikes is particularly evident in sectors where the impact is immediate and disproportionate to the number of workers involved, such as transport, construction, and manufacturing.

However, wildcat strikes can cause problems for unions, challenging their authority and undermining the negotiation process, potentially forcing unions to condemn their members' actions.
3 Britannica Sources
Created from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.

wildcat strike, work stoppage undertaken by employees without the consent of their respective unions. Such strikes are not necessarily illegal, but they often violate terms of a collective bargaining agreement. The name is based on the stereotypical characteristics associated with wildcats: unpredictability and uncontrollability. These terms of description are often applied by the employers, the media, and the state, not the workers themselves.

The legitimacy of strikes per se has always been contested by the employers and the state, because strikes represent a challenge to their authority, power, and interests. For them, work stoppages that are held without notice or warning are often the most damaging, because the element of surprise and unpreparedness are two of the key tools in the workers’ armory for creating bargaining leverage. Wildcats provide no opportunity for employers to preempt the action by making threats to workers’ livelihoods or pay or by persuading them that their grievances should be dealt with by negotiations, mediation, or arbitration. In addition, such strikes leave little latitude for replacement workers to be hired or for stocks of produced goods or components to be built up or brought in from elsewhere.

Wildcats are particularly useful for workers in a variety of situations. The most obvious is when the strike’s impact has an immediate and disproportionate relation to the number of workers taking part, as, for example, in transport (air, rail, road, sea), newspapers, letter and parcel delivery, construction, and vehicle manufacture. The immediate impact of the wildcat is strengthened because, in these examples, the delivery of a service or product either is time-sensitive or has no substitute. Sometimes, the service or product is perishable. Often commercial contracts now stipulate specific times for service or project delivery, and failure to meet them results in financial penalties. This creates potential bargaining leverage. In recent years, a variant of this vulnerable configuration of work systems has emerged through the use of just-in-time (JIT) production, in which there are no supplies of stock at hand to withstand strikes (or breakdowns). Under JIT production systems, it is not only the immediate employer that comes under pressure but also the buyer of the components, as in the vehicle industry. Wildcats are also often used to provide a quick and robust demonstration of workers’ feelings on an issue or to apply a powerful form of pressure when management becomes intransigent during employer-union negotiations.

Wildcats have traditionally caused problems for unions. First, unions have rulebooks and constitutions under which proposals for strikes must pass to gain authorization and legitimacy. Wildcats eschew this process and challenge the authority of the national union and its general secretary or president. It nevertheless happens that, under force of pressure from the strikers, unions can retrospectively give sanction to wildcats. Second, when employers grant unions the rights of information, consultation, representation, and negotiation, employers presuppose that they are dealing with one unified and responsible bargaining partner typified by the union full-time officer. When a union’s members stage a wildcat, they will have contravened the stipulated use of negotiation, conciliation, mediation, and possibly arbitration to resolve grievances. In this situation, unions are often forced to condemn their own members’ actions because these actions are viewed to have undermined the legitimacy of the bargaining relationship with the employer.

However, wildcats are seldom unofficial strikes—that is, seldom are they completely without some degree of union support and knowledge. Most wildcats will be sanctioned in some way by the lower level of a union, be it the workplace representative or even the local paid officer, because these union officers understand the importance of such collective mobilization for aiding the strength and cohesion of the workplace union and, in turn, the importance of workplace unionism as a foundation of national unionism.

Gregor Gall

wildcat strike

Thank you for signing up!