realism
-
What is realism in international relations?
In international relations, realism is a collection of theories that emphasize the role of the state, national interest, and power in global politics. Realists maintain that the world operates under anarchy, where each state relies on its capabilities to advance its own national interests, the most important of which is its own survival.
Hans J. Morgenthau's Politics Among Nations (1948) significantly contributed to the framework of realism. Realism posits that the pursuit of national interests, and the struggle for power are integral to human nature, leading to collaboration and competition between states.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Why do realists believe countries act mainly in their own interest?
Realists believe countries primarily act in their own interest due to the anarchic nature of the international system, where no central authority enforces laws. In this self-help system, each state must ensure its own security, leading to power-maximizing behavior.
Realists argue that the primary national interest is the state's survival, including its people, political system, and territorial integrity. Consequently, states prioritize their interests in an environment where war is considered normal. This perspective emphasizes the perennial role of power and self-interest in shaping state behavior.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What does realism say about power and security between countries?
In international relations, realism emphasizes the role of states, national interest, and power in global politics. Realists view the international system as anarchic, without a central authority, leading states to prioritize their security and self-reliance.
Realism posits that states pursue power to ensure their survival, leading to a self-help system where war is considered normal as a means to resolve conflicts. Cooperation among states is seen as rare due to the primacy of security concerns, and international institutions have limited influence on state behavior. Some realists, however, acknowledge that cooperation is possible but are skeptical of its long-term success.
4 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How does realism explain conflict and cooperation between nations?
Realism in international relations emphasizes states, national interest, and power in world politics. Realists view the world as anarchic, where states prioritize their survival and security.
Conflict arises from clashes of national interests in this anarchic system, where states often compete for power. Collaboration occurs when states find coinciding interests, such as forming alliances for collective power. However, realists are pessimistic about lasting cooperation due to the self-seeking nature of states. They believe cooperation is rare, as states are autonomous and self-reliant.
5 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Who are some important thinkers in realism and what ideas did they contribute?
Several important thinkers have contributed to the development of realism in international relations.
-
E.H. Carr Criticized the idealism of liberal internationalists, focusing on power and self-interest as key factors in state behavior.
-
Hans Morgenthau Developed the classical realist approach, emphasizing power as the dominant goal in international politics and defining national interest in terms of power. His book, Politics Among Nations, provided a theoretical framework for realism.
-
Kenneth Waltz Originated neorealism (or structural realism), focusing on the international system's structure and the distribution of power among states. He argued that the anarchic state of international relations and the distribution of power are the two main features of his theory.
Realism asserts that states operate in an anarchic international system where they depend on their capabilities to promote their national interests, with the most important interest being the state's survival.
5 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
-
How does realism compare to other international relations theories, like liberalism or constructivism?
Realism, a dominant theory in international relations since World War II, emphasizes the role of the state, national interest, and power in world politics. It contrasts with liberal internationalism, which promotes cooperation, diplomacy, and international institutions, viewing violence as a last resort. Realists often criticize liberal internationalists as dangerously utopian, while liberals see realists as overly fatalistic.
Constructivism, another perspective, argues that international relations are shaped by shared ideas and social constructs, not just objective power dynamics. Unlike realism's focus on anarchy and self-interest, constructivists believe that the international system is what states make of it, suggesting that a more cooperative environment can be constructed through discourse.
4 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
realism, set of related theories of international relations that emphasizes the role of the state, national interest, and power in world politics.
Realism has dominated the academic study of international relations since the end of World War II. Realists claim to offer both the most accurate explanation of state behaviour and a set of policy prescriptions (notably the balance of power between states) for ameliorating the inherent destabilizing elements of international affairs. Realism (including neorealism) focuses on abiding patterns of interaction in an international system lacking a centralized political authority. That condition of anarchy means that the logic of international politics often differs from that of domestic politics, which is regulated by a sovereign power. Realists are generally pessimistic about the possibility of radical systemic reform. Realism is a broad tradition of thought that comprises a variety of different strands, the most distinctive of which are classical realism and neorealism.
Classical realism in international relations
Realists frequently claim to draw on an ancient tradition of political thought. Among classic authors often cited by realists are Thucydides, Niccolò Machiavelli, Thomas Hobbes, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and Max Weber. Realism as a self-conscious movement in the study of international relations emerged during the mid-20th century and was inspired by the British political scientist and historian E.H. Carr. Carr attacked what he perceived as the dangerous and deluded “idealism” of liberal internationalists and, in particular, their belief in the possibility of progress through the construction of international institutions such as the League of Nations. He focused instead on the perennial role of power and self-interest in determining state behaviour. The outbreak of World War II converted many scholars to that pessimistic vision. Thereafter, realism became established in American political science departments, its fortunes boosted by a number of émigré European scholars, most notably the German-born political scientist and historian Hans Morgenthau. It is the realism of Carr, Morgenthau, and their followers that is known as classical.
" height="20" alt="HEW Logo">
Morgenthau’s Politics Among Nations (1948) helped to meet the need for a general theoretical framework for realism. Not only did it become one of the most extensively used textbooks in the United States and Britain—it continued to be republished in new editions over the next half century—it also was an essential exposition of the realist theory of international relations. Numerous other contributors to realist theory emerged in the decade or so after World War II, including Arnold Wolfers, George F. Kennan, Robert Strausz-Hupé, Henry Kissinger, and the theologian Reinhold Niebuhr.
According to realism, states exist within an anarchic international system in which they are ultimately dependent on their own capabilities, or power, to further their national interests. The most important national interest is the survival of the state, including its people, political system, and territorial integrity. Other major interests for realists include the preservation of a nation’s culture and economy. Realists contend that, as long as the world is divided into nation-states in an anarchic setting, national interest will remain the essence of international politics.
Classical realism was not a coherent school of thought. It drew from a wide variety of sources and offered competing visions of the self, the state, and the world. Whereas Carr was influenced by Marxism, Morgenthau drew on Friedrich Nietzsche, Weber, Carl Schmitt, and American civic republicanism. Classical realists were united mainly by that which they opposed. Critical of the optimism and explanatory ambition of liberal internationalists, classical realists instead stressed the various barriers to progress and reform that allegedly inhered in human nature, in political institutions, or in the structure of the international system. The fortunes of classical realism, grounded as it was in a combination of history, philosophy, and theology, waned during the era of social-scientific behaviourism in the 1960s. Its fortunes were revived by the emergence of neorealism during the 1970s.