one-state solution
-
What is the one-state solution in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?
The one-state solution is a proposed resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict where a single state is shared by both Israeli Jews and Palestinian Arabs, granting equal rights to all residents in Israel, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip.
This proposition contrasts with the two-state solution, which aims to establish independent, mutually recognized states for both groups.
There are various articulations of the one-state solution. Some involve a broad restructuring of the existing political system to ensure equal rights and prevent unilateral governance by either demographic majority. Others propose a binational arrangement with separate political structures but joint management of shared concerns. Some Israelis advocate for retaining Israel's Jewish identity while considering Palestinian rights, while some Palestinians envision a future where they control all of historical Palestine.
Critics argue that the one-state solution may undermine the self-determination of both peoples.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How does the one-state solution differ from the two-state solution?
The two-state solution proposes resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict by creating two independent states: Israel for Jewish people and Palestine for Palestinian people. This framework was formalized in the Oslo Accords of 1993, leading to the establishment of the Palestinian Authority.
In contrast, the one-state solution suggests a single, democratic state between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River, where all residents have equal rights as citizens. This would involve restructuring the existing political system. Some propose a binational arrangement managing shared resources while maintaining separate political structures. Unlike the two-state solution, the one-state solution lacks formal agreement and raises concerns about self-determination for both peoples.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Who supports the idea of a one-state solution?
The one-state solution is a proposed resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict where all permanent residents between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea would have equal rights as citizens within a single, democratic state.
This proposition contrasts with the two-state solution, which aims to establish independent, mutually recognized states for Israeli Jews and Palestinian Arabs.
Some right-wing Israelis envision a one-state solution where Israel maintains its Jewish identity, with varied perspectives on granting Palestinians full citizenship rights. Naftali Bennett once proposed Israel controlling the West Bank while granting autonomy to Palestinian urban centers. Reuven Rivlin suggested annexing the West Bank, granting citizenship to Palestinians while preserving Israel's Jewish character. Itamar Ben-Gvir has advocated for a one-state solution encouraging Palestinian emigration.
Conversely, some Palestinians believe they will eventually control all of historical Palestine, while Hamas has historically called for an Islamic state. Edward Said suggested a binational Israeli-Palestinian state.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What are the main reasons people support or oppose the one-state solution?
The one-state solution involves Israelis and Palestinians living in a single democratic state with equal rights, contrasting the two-state solution of separate, independent states.
Support for the one-state solution arises from the failure of the Oslo peace process and a belief that real peace can only come through a binational state. Some right-wing Israelis advocate for a one-state solution where Israel retains its Jewish identity, with varied views on Palestinian rights. Some Palestinians believe they will eventually control all of historical Palestine.
Opposition stems from the unresolved core tension of two peoples desiring self-determination in the same land. Critics also note the difficulty of ensuring fair governance and protecting minority rights within a single state, whether Jewish or Arab.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How could the one-state solution affect the rights of Israelis and Palestinians?
The one-state solution proposes Israelis and Palestinians share a single state with equal rights, but its impact on each group's rights varies depending on the specific model.
Some propose a democratic state granting equal rights to all residents, requiring a broad restructuring of the current political system. To prevent unilateral governance by either a Jewish or Arab majority, some suggest mechanisms like a two-thirds majority vote on constitutional issues. Others advocate for a binational arrangement managing shared economic and security matters while maintaining separate political structures for each group on civil law issues.
Conversely, some Israelis propose a one-state solution where Israel retains its Jewish identity, with varied views on Palestinian citizenship. Some Palestinians envision a future where they control all of historical Palestine, while Hamas calls for an Islamic state. Critics of the one-state paradigm argue that it may not satisfy either group's desire for self-determination.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What challenges make the one-state solution hard to achieve?
The one-state solution, which proposes a single democratic state for Israelis and Palestinians, faces significant challenges. A primary obstacle is the unresolved core tension between the desire of both groups for self-determination in the same land.
Additional difficulties involve determining the structure of the state, such as whether it will be binational or unitary, and how to ensure equal rights and representation for all citizens, regardless of ethnicity or religion. Historical grievances, security concerns, and the division of resources like land and water further complicate the implementation of a one-state solution.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
one-state solution, term used to describe various proposals for resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that do not include establishing separate states for Israeli Jews and Palestinian Arabs. The term most commonly refers to the idea of Israeli Jews and Palestinian Arabs sharing a single state with full and equal rights for the populations residing in Israel, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip. The most common critique of such a proposal is that it would preclude the self-determination of either the Jewish people or the Palestinian people or both.
One state or two states?
The one-state solution stands in contrast to the two-state solution, in which Israeli Jews and Palestinian Arabs would have independent and mutually recognized states. Unlike the one-state solution, the two-state solution has been formalized in a peace process, which was established by the Oslo Accords (1993 and 1995). The peace process created the semiautonomous Palestinian Authority (PA) and set a tangible foundation for separate states. The process, intended to be completed by 1999, stalled in the late 1990s because of concerns about security, viability, and contentions over Jerusalem, Israeli settlements, Palestinian refugees, and other final status issues. As the only bilateral peace process enshrined in international treaties, the two-state solution of the Oslo Accords remains the consensus position of the international community.
Proponents of the one-state paradigm point to the failure of the Oslo peace process and raise a one-state approach as a potential alternative. As the peace process stumbled in the late 1990s, the Palestinian American academic Edward Said wrote in The New York Times Magazine, āIt is time to question whether the entire process begun in Oslo in 1993 is the right instrument for bringing peace between Palestinians and Israelis. It is my view thatā¦real peace can come only with a binational Israeli-Palestinian state.ā Some analysts suggest acknowledging a āone-state realityāāan ambiguous reference to the continued entanglement of Israelis and Palestinians on the groundāas the starting point for negotiating a workable solution. Critics of the one-state paradigm note that it does not resolve the core tension underlying the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: the desire of two peoples for self-determination in the same land.
" height="20" alt="HEW Logo">
Common articulations of a one-state solution
The term one-state solution is most commonly used to refer to a proposed solution in which all permanent residents of one democratic state between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River would enjoy full and equal rights as citizens. It would involve a broad restructuring of the existing political system, whether beginning with the Israeli governmentās conferral of citizenship on Palestinian Arabs in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip or beginning with the creation of a new state altogether. Mechanisms such as subjecting legislation on constitutional issues to a two-thirds majority vote have been floated to prevent a majoritarian state in which the demographic majority, whether Jewish or Arab, would govern unilaterally. Some proponents advocate a binational or consociational arrangement where a federation or confederation would jointly manage economic matters, security, and Jerusalem as a common capital but maintain separate political structures for Israeli Jews and Palestinian Arabs on some matters of civil law.
Other proposals call for a unitary state that is Jewish, Palestinian, or Islamic, with varying ideas about the rights and freedoms of the people outside the dominant group. Many right-wing Israelis advocate a one-state solution where Israel would retain its Jewish identity and symbols, with differing views on whether (and, if so, how) Palestinians would gain full rights of citizenship. When gearing up for Israeli elections set for 2013, Naftali Bennett proposed a āStability Initiative,ā in which Israel would control the West Bank but allow its Palestinian urban centers to remain autonomous in their civil administration. Another proposal, favored by former Israeli president Reuven Rivlin (2014ā21), involved annexing the West Bank and extending full rights of citizenship to the Palestinians living there while retaining the Jewish character of the state. (The status of the Gaza Strip under the proposals by both Bennett and Rivlin was unclear.) Itamar Ben-Gvir, a far-right Israeli politician who became minister of national security in 2022, has suggested a one-state solution that would encourage Palestinians to emigrate. Among Palestinians, many express the belief that, in the absence of a negotiated solution, they will eventually control all of historical Palestine, although this view has manifested in opinion polling and has not been articulated in any particular plan. Hamas, an Islamist organization asserting that Palestine is an Islamic holy land, has traditionally called for a one-state solution that is Islamic in character, despite the number of Jews and Christians who live in the region.