Quick Facts
Latin:
ā€œmethod of affirmingā€ and ā€œmethod of denyingā€
Britannica AI Icon
Adding us as a Preferred Source tells Google you trust our content, so our articles show up more often in your Google Search, Discover feed, and AI Overviews.
verifiedCite
While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions.
Select Citation Style
Feedback
Corrections? Updates? Omissions? Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login).
Thank you for your feedback

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

External Websites

Modus ponens and modus tollensmodus tollens

logic
Also known as: rule of detachment

Modus ponens and modus tollensmodus tollens, in propositional logic, two types of inference that can be drawn from a hypothetical proposition—i.e., from a proposition of the form ā€œIf A, then Bā€ (symbolically A ⊃ B, in which ⊃ signifies ā€œIf . . . thenā€). Modus ponens refers to inferences of the form A ⊃ B; A, therefore B. Modus tollens refers to inferences of the form A ⊃ B; ∼B, therefore, ∼A (∼ signifies ā€œnotā€). An example of modus tollens is the following:

If an angle is inscribed in a semicircle, then it is a right angle; this angle is not a right angle; therefore, this angle is not inscribed in a semicircle.

For disjunctive premises (employing ∨, which signifies ā€œeither . . . orā€), the terms modus tollendo ponens and modus ponendo tollens are used for arguments of the forms A ∨ B; ∼A, therefore B, and A ∨ B; A, therefore ∼B (valid only for exclusive disjunction: ā€œEither A or B but not bothā€). The rule of modus ponens is incorporated into virtually every formal system of logic.