- Related Topics:
- armed force
- dictatorship
- coup d’état
military dictatorship
-
What is a military dictatorship?
A military dictatorship is a form of government where the military holds total control of a country, typically after seizing power through a coup. These regimes are a subtype of authoritarian rule, differing from civilian dictatorships like Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union.
Military dictatorships often stifle political dissent and are marked by human rights abuses such as killings, torture, and disappearances. Some military leaders justify their control as the only way to protect citizens from threats. While military rule was especially prevalent during the Cold War, its incidence has declined since.
5 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Who controls the government in a military dictatorship?
In a military dictatorship, the military, as an organization, wields total control over a country, typically seizing power through a coup, thereby establishing a political regime where military power is paramount. Though the military maintains a high degree of autonomy due to its control over the means of coercion, it is not a monolithic entity. Hierarchical divisions exist between high command, junior officers, and enlisted personnel, along with competition among service branches like the army, navy, and air force. Military regimes often attempt to secure consent from the governed, sometimes permitting elections or using judiciaries. However, human rights abuses, such as killings, torture, and disappearances, are commonplace.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How does a military dictatorship differ from a democracy?
A military dictatorship and a democracy differ significantly in their structures and principles. In a military dictatorship, the military holds total control, often seizing power through a coup, suppressing dissent, and justifying its rule as necessary for national security. Such regimes are marked by human rights abuses.
In contrast, a democracy is characterized by free and fair elections, freedom of expression, and an independent judiciary. It ensures citizens can participate in politics without fear, with fundamental rights protecting their ability to voice opinions and access information.
4 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Why do some countries become military dictatorships?
Military dictatorships, where the military exerts total control, often arise after a coup overthrows the existing government. Factors such as violations of military hierarchy, heightened threats, or a sense of expanded military mission can trigger these takeovers. High political conflict, economic crises, and weak political parties can also contribute. Military regimes often stifle dissent, justifying it as necessary for national security. The end of the Cold War saw a decline in military dictatorships as superpowers stopped supporting coups. However, recent takeovers in Africa and Myanmar demonstrate that this form of government persists, often marked by human rights abuses.
4 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What are some examples of countries that have had military dictatorships?
A military dictatorship is a form of government where the military assumes total control of a country, typically through a coup, marked by human rights abuses.
Examples include:
* Chile: Gen. Augusto Pinochet rose to power after a coup in 1973, leading a military dictatorship known for violence and intimidation.
* Argentina: From 1976-1983, a military dictatorship carried out the "Dirty War," resulting in the deaths and disappearances of thousands.
* Myanmar: In February 2021, military officials seized power, detaining civilian leaders and refusing to accept election results.
* Nigeria: Military leaders have been criticized for resolving conflicts with force and demanding that civilian organizations develop hierarchical structures similar to the military.
* Pakistan: Some countries ruled by military dictatorships, such as Mohammad Zia-ul-Haq’s Pakistan, have reverted to civilian rule upon the death of the dictator.4 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How do military dictatorships affect the lives of citizens?
Military dictatorships exert total control, often after seizing power through a coup. These regimes are marked by human rights abuses like killings, torture, and disappearances. While some attempt to gain consent through elections or judiciaries, extrajudicial repression is commonplace.
These dictatorships stifle political dissent, justifying their rule as necessary for safety from threats. Military rule can foster militarism, glorifying war and demanding military-style discipline in civilian life, but this can backfire, spurring opposition from artists and activists. Competition within the military for the rewards of direct rule can lead to further instability and coups.
The U.S. and Soviet Union supported these governments during the Cold War. Since the end of the Cold War, military regimes have declined.
4 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
military dictatorship, form of government in which the military exerts total control of a country, usually after seizing power by overthrowing the previous rulers in a coup. Military dictatorships are typically marked by brutal human rights abuses, such as killings, torture, and disappearances. Their incidence began to decline following the end of the Cold War, when the 20th-century superpowers, the United States and the former Soviet Union, stopped backing coups or propping up military-led “client states” in their global rivalry for power.
Military dictatorships are known for stifling political dissent, and dictators sometimes justify their rule as the only way to keep the citizens of a country safe from external and internal threats. Military dictatorships differ from civilian dictatorships, which are ruled by individuals or political parties that do not derive their power directly from the military. Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, and North Korea are examples of civilian dictatorships.
Some countries ruled by military dictatorships, such as Francisco Franco’s Spain or Mohammad Zia-ul-Haq’s Pakistan, have reverted to civilian rule upon the death of the dictator. In other instances, military dictatorships have negotiated an end to their rule. Nigerian Gen. Olusegun Obasanjo turned power over to a civilian government in accordance with a previously agreed timetable, while Suharto was forced from power in Indonesia as a result of a sweeping economic crisis. Often, military dictators fall in a manner consistent with their rise—through yet another violent coup. Jonathan Powell, an associate professor in the School of Politics, Security, and International Affairs at the University of Central Florida has observed, “When a country has one coup, that’s often a harbinger of more coups.”
" height="20" alt="HEW Logo">
Military dictatorships were especially prevalent during the Cold War, sometimes gaining and keeping power with the support of the United States, which backed these governments in an attempt to keep communism from taking root. U.S. support for military dictatorships included training Latin American military officials on the use of harsh techniques at the U.S. Army’s School of the Americas. One of the most notorious military dictators to emerge from this climate was Gen. Augusto Pinochet, who became president of Chile after a military coup in September 1973. With training and funding from the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, the Chilean armed forces overthrew socialist Pres.Salvador Allende, who had been elected in 1970. Allende, who committed suicide during the coup, had alarmed other countries in the region by nationalizing banks and taking other actions to redistribute wealth. Those policies led to inflation, food shortages, and strikes that cost him the support of the middle class.
Pinochet’s government used violence and intimidation to remain in power, and former government officials and left-wing activists faced the harshest repression. More than 130,000 Chileans were arrested in the first three years of the regime. During Pinochet’s reign, tens of thousands of people were held as political prisoners and tortured. The overthrow of the Chilean government was one of a wave of military coups that peaked in the 1960s and ’70s. In Argentina an estimated 10,000 to 30,000 people were killed during the Dirty War (1976–83), a bloody campaign carried out by the country’s military dictatorship against suspected left-wing political opponents. Many victims of the dictatorship were “disappeared”—apparently murdered—by the authorities; human rights activists in Argentina would bring international attention to the abuses visited upon the thousands of desaparecidos (“disappeared persons”).
Despite the overall decline in military coups worldwide since the end of the Cold War, there has been an uptick in Africa in recent years. In 2021 the continent saw military takeovers in Chad, Guinea, Mali, and Sudan. The following year, there were two coups in Burkina Faso. In both cases, the juntas responsible for the coups cited the government’s failure to deal with violent Islamist militants in the country.
Another recent coup took place in Myanmar in Southeast Asia, where military officials seized power in February 2021. The military refused to accept national election results, which were seen as a referendum on civilian leader Aung San Suu Kyi, and the junta detained her along with other civilian government officials. Suu Kyi, who won the Nobel Prize for Peace in 1991 for championing democracy, was placed under house arrest and sentenced to more than 30 years in prison. Gen. Min Aung Hlaing, who led the military junta, promised a “free and fair” election in the future. International human rights organizations estimated that his regime, in just over a year, had been responsible for more than 15,000 arbitrary detentions and at least 2,300 extrajudicial killings.
The trusted destination for professionals, college students, and lifelong learners.
SUBSCRIBE
