- Key People:
- Daniel Kahneman
- Erving Goffman
- Related Topics:
- social science
frame analysis
-
What is frame analysis?
Frame analysis is a versatile approach used to study how people construct their understanding of reality. Sociologist Erving Goffman, who coined the term, defined frames as cultural definitions of reality that enable individuals to interpret events and objects. For instance, an advertisement might portray driving as pleasurable by associating it with leisure symbols.
Goffman saw frame analysis as part of ethnographic research, helping analysts understand how people use frames to make sense of behavior, whether through religious or secular perspectives. The study of framing has significantly impacted social sciences, with applications ranging from economics and social psychology to media studies and political science. Social movement and political communication scholars consider the role of intentionality in framing, viewing frames as tools that can be intentionally used to influence attitudes and create change.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Who introduced the concept of frame analysis?
Erving Goffman, a sociologist, is credited with coining the term frame analysis in his 1974 book, Frame Analysis. Goffman defined frames as culturally determined definitions of reality that enable people to make sense of events and objects. Frame analysis is a flexible approach to studying social constructions of reality. Goffman envisioned frame analysis as part of ethnographic research. This would allow analysts to interpret social behavior to understand the frames participants use to make sense of their reality, whether through a religious or secular lens.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How do frames influence the way we interpret information?
Frames shape our understanding by providing culturally determined definitions of reality, allowing us to interpret events and objects. Framing influences decision-making, as highlighted by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky's research, and is used by social movements and media to sway opinions.
Framing directs attention to specific aspects of reality while obscuring others, guiding audiences toward preferred conclusions. This intentional deployment of frames can drive changes in attitudes and mobilize support for organizations. In film, framing involves carefully selecting what to include or exclude within each shot, influencing how the audience perceives the scene.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What are some common examples of frames in everyday life or the media?
Frame analysis examines how people interpret objects and events based on culturally determined definitions of reality. Erving Goffman, who coined the term, defined a frame as a means to understand the context that shapes social behavior.
Examples of frames:
* Advertisements A car advertisement may frame driving as a pleasurable activity by associating it with leisure symbols.
* Media Frames in mass communication guide audiences to preferred conclusions by emphasizing certain aspects of reality while obscuring others.
* Debates The structure of a debate, including the order of turns, provides a framework that influences how the discussion is perceived.2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How can changing the frame of a situation alter people's opinions or reactions?
Framing, in the context of frame analysis, refers to how the presentation of information can influence people's perceptions and decisions. Erving Goffman defined a frame as a culturally determined definition of reality that allows people to make sense of events.
The media uses framing to highlight specific aspects of reality, guiding audiences toward preferred conclusions. This can impact political attitudes and mobilize people to take action. The framing of problems significantly influences decision-making. By intentionally deploying frames, it's possible to change attitudes and mobilize support for social movements and political causes.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Why is frame analysis important for understanding communication and social issues?
Frame analysis is important for understanding communication and social issues because it examines how people interpret objects and events based on culturally determined definitions of reality. Erving Goffman, who coined the term, saw frame analysis as a way to understand how people make sense of behavior through religious or secular frames.
Frame analysis has influenced social psychology, economics, social movement research, and media studies. Social movement theorists recognize framing as essential to organizational activity, while political communication theorists study frames as a way media can influence political attitudes. By understanding frames, we gain insight into how reality is socially constructed and how it impacts our understanding of the world.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
frame analysis, a broadly applied, relatively flexible label for a variety of approaches to studying social constructions of reality.
The sociologist Erving Goffman, who is credited with coining the term in his 1974 book Frame Analysis, understood the idea of the frame to mean the culturally determined definitions of reality that allow people to make sense of objects and events. For example, a car advertisement might seek to frame driving as an essentially pleasurable activity by associating it with recognizable symbols of play and leisure (in the target culture) such as a beach. Goffman envisioned frame analysis to be an element of ethnographic research that would allow analysts to read identifiable chunks of social behaviour, or âstrips,â in order to understand the frames that participants use to make sense of the behaviour (whether they apprehend their reality, for instance, through a religious or a secular frame). The study of framing and its role in social life has had wide effects across a broad spectrum of the social sciences.
Social psychology and economics found common ground in Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tverskyâs Nobel Prize-winning research into how the framing of problems influences decision making. Social movement researchers developed more-specific uses for frame analysis, turning the general ethnographic method into a more-specified tool for understanding the particular dynamics of activist movements. Media scholars emphasized the political role played by frames in mass communication, examining the use of frames to guide audiences to preferred conclusions by simultaneously highlighting particular aspects of reality and hiding others.
" height="20" alt="HEW Logo">
Social movement research and political communication have been the two main subfields of political science to consider the role of frames. However, work in both areas has moved substantially away from Goffmanâs formulation by reconsidering the role of intentionality in framing. Goffman saw frames as being either âprimary frameworksââthe product of larger culture and shared by all within a cultureâor as intentionally fabricated by individualsâa âtransformationâ of the primary frameworks. Individuals who intentionally deploy frames transform a culturally constructed social reality and do so either in play or to deceive. Goffmanâs reading of intentional framing thus cast it as a move away from a more âauthenticâ reality rather than as an element that revealed the struggles for power constituting or maintaining that reality. Meanwhile, both social movement and political communication scholars viewed the question of intentionality in framing in a substantially different way. Both lines of research saw frames as relevant to politics precisely because they can be intentionally deployed to create a change in attitudes.
Social movement theorists also recognized framing as a pillar of organizational activity. These theorists moved quickly to recognize that the intentional deployment of frames is an important function played by organizations to mobilize adherents and constituents. They recognized the process of frame alignmentâthe linkage of individual and organizational interpretive framesâto be not a deception enacted between two people but rather a legitimate means to organizational ends.
Theorists of political communication studied frames as one way that media (or the elites who manipulate them) can influence audiencesâ political attitudes. Although audiences can potentially interpret texts in a number of different ways, people are most likely, in the absence of having additional information, to interpret problems, causes, and solutions for issues in terms of the way that those issues have been framed.