converse fallacy of accident

logic

Written by

The Information Architects of Encyclopaedia Britannica

Last updated

June 24, 2026

Quick Summary

The converse fallacy of accident is a logical error where a general rule is improperly applied to a specific case. This occurs when an argument moves from a particular instance, with its unique circumstances (accidents), to a broad generalization that doesn't account for those specifics.12

For example, concluding that a certain drug is beneficial for everyone because it helps some sick individuals would be an instance of the converse fallacy of accident. The argument fails because it overlooks the individual variations and conditions that make the general rule inapplicable to all cases.2

Summary created from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.

4 Britannica Sources

Ask Britannica AI about this topic

Britannica doesn't have a full article on this topic, so we've curated a list of our relevant coverage.

fallacy
Material fallacies
(2) The converse fallacy of accident argues improperly from a special case to a general rule. Thus, the fact that a certain drug is beneficial to some sick persons does not imply that it is beneficial to all people. (3) The fallacy of irrelevant conclusion is committed…
Read More
(2) The converse fallacy of accident argues improperly from a special case to a general rule. Thus, the fact that a certain drug is beneficial to some sick persons does not imply that it is beneficial to all people. (3) The fallacy of irrelevant conclusion is committed…
Read More