- Related Topics:
- nationalism
- religion
civil religion
-
What is civil religion?
Civil religion is a public expression of faith that aims to instill political values and prescribes dogmas, rites, and rituals for citizens within a specific country.
French philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau introduced the concept, emphasizing its importance for a healthy political society. He argued that civil religion should encourage social harmony and a love for public duties among citizens, fostering unity and stability.
Rousseau suggested that the core beliefs of civil religion should include the afterlife, a perfect God, justice, and the sanctity of laws. While not an established religion, civil religion aims to unite divine love with national laws, inspiring citizens to support their country.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How is civil religion different from regular religion?
Civil religion differs from regular religion in its primary goal: it aims to instill political values and a sense of civic duty rather than focusing on the divine or spiritual aspects of life. It involves a public profession of faith with prescribed dogmas, rites, and rituals for citizens of a particular country. Unlike established religions, civil religion may not endorse specific religious institutions or prioritize otherworldly concerns. Instead, it seeks to unite divine love with the laws of the country, prompting citizens to pray for their homeland and vivifying the body politic.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What are examples of civil religion in a country?
Civil religion is a public expression of faith that aims to instill political values, prescribing dogmas, rites, and rituals for citizens.
Examples:
* United States Sociologist Robert Neelly Bellah suggested that the U.S. has a civil religion with rituals that unite citizens, employing symbols from specific religions but operating independently of them. The U.S. has its own saints and martyrs, such as George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Abraham Lincoln, and operates on the idea that it is a nation chosen by God.
* France Laïcité (the lay principle) promotes a nonreligious state identity, which some scholars might call a civil religion. It supports the laity against the clergy and favors a nonreligious public sphere.
* Ancient Rome and Greece Historian Numa Denis Fustel de Coulanges identified civil religion forms in the foundations of ancient city-states. Polybius noted that superstition bound the Roman state together, making Rome superior in religion because it stimulated magistrates to be dutiful, while fear of gods restrained the masses.4 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Why do societies use civil religion?
Societies employ civil religion to cultivate political values, prescribe civic duties, and foster social cohesion through shared faiths. As Jean-Jacques Rousseau argued, civil religion encourages citizens to love their country, obey its laws, and unite divine love with patriotism. It promotes stability, order, and national prosperity by fostering sentiments of sociability.
However, civil religion also carries risks, potentially fostering intolerance, superstition, and the construction of dogmatic elements that may be poorly devised or theologically unsound. Despite these weaknesses, civil religion aims to bind citizens to their country and to each other.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How do national symbols and rituals relate to civil religion?
Civil religion uses national symbols and rituals to instill political values and a sense of unity among citizens. These symbols and rituals, drawn from social, political, and religious domains, express a nation's values and objectives. Examples include national flags, anthems, and monuments, as well as ceremonies like inaugurations and national holidays.
These elements foster sentiments of sociability and love of public duties, promoting stability, order, and prosperity. Civil religion is not the same as religious establishment; civil religion unites divine love with the laws of one’s country, prompts people to pray for their homeland, and vivifies the body politic.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What are some criticisms or challenges of civil religion as a concept?
Civil religion, a concept where public faith aims to instill political values through prescribed dogmas, rites, and rituals, faces several criticisms. As the dogmatic elements of sociability are constructed and vary across countries, they could be poorly or incoherently devised. The theological postulates of civil religion may be false, and it also risks fostering credulity, superstition, and intolerance within the body politic.
In a pluralistic country, moral or practical problems may arise when trying to foster or perpetuate civil religion. Defining a country as aligned to one particular set of beliefs marginalizes those outside it and can promote discrimination and violence.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
civil religion, a public profession of faith that aims to inculcate political values and that prescribes dogma, rites, and rituals for citizens of a particular country.
This definition of civil religion remains consistent with its first sustained theoretical treatment, in Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s The Social Contract (1762). Rousseau dedicated a penultimate and relatively lengthy chapter of that work to a discussion of civil religion, laying out its central conceptual elements and emphasizing its normative importance for a healthy body politic. The object of civil religion for Rousseau is to foster sentiments of sociability and a love of public duties among citizens, extending those bonds throughout a citizenry and its membership. Civil religion identifies gods and tutelary benefactors to assist with that great aim, and its successful inculcation is supposed to help maintain stability, order, and prosperity for the country.
Rousseau proposed that the dogmas of civil religion ought to be simple: they should affirm the afterlife, a God with divine perfection, the notion that the just will be happy and the wicked punished, and the sanctity of the social contract and the polity’s laws. Civil religion should also condemn intolerance as a creedal matter, Rousseau contended, given that there can never again be an exclusive national religion. A civil profession of faith ought to tolerate all and only those religions that tolerate others, he suggested, at least insofar as the respective religious groups do not uphold beliefs that run contrary to citizens’ duties. More extremely, Rousseau averred that penalties may rightly be applied against those who do not observe the civil religion. Although government cannot obligate a person to believe its dogmas, one who fails to adopt them can rightly be banished from the state on grounds of unsociability. Additionally, a citizen who publicly acknowledges civil dogmas may be punished with death if, subsequently, that citizen behaves as if he does not believe them.
Civil religion is not identical to religious establishment. While established religions receive symbolic endorsement or financial aid from government, they may not reciprocate by supporting state institutions or citizens’ duties. An established religion might advocate meekness or withdrawal from public life or promote other values that run contrary to the purposes of citizenship. Established religions can prioritize otherworldly ends over life on earth, too, or identify a church leadership independent of political authorities. Rousseau saw the latter problem as both common and pernicious: “Wherever the clergy constitutes a body,” he wrote, “it is master and legislator in its domain.” Rousseau claimed that Thomas Hobbes was the only Christian writer brave enough to propose that Christianity and state be reunified but that Hobbes apparently misunderstood that Christianity is terrible for founding republics. Rousseau charged that Christianity teaches people to be excessively servile and dependent, leaving adherents unsuitable for military service and ready for slavery. Interestingly, Rousseau contrasted contemporary, institutionalized Christianity with the “religion of man,” distinguishing the latter as the religion of the gospel. He lauded the religion of man as “saintly, sublime, [and] true” but added that its weakness lies in the fact that it lacks a proper relation to the political whole and, as such, gives no external force to the fraternal unity that it envisions.
Rousseau maintained that civil religion has decided benefits. It unites divine love with the laws of one’s country, prompts people to pray for their homeland, and vivifies the body politic. But civil religion has distinct weaknesses. Because its dogmatic elements of sociability are constructed, and will vary across countries, it stands to reason that they could be devised poorly or incoherently. Furthermore, the theological postulates of the civil religion presumably may be false, a point that Rousseau seemed to recognize. Civil religion also runs the risk of fostering credulity, superstition, and intolerance in the body politic. In addition, moral or prudential problems may accompany efforts to foster or perpetuate civil religion in a pluralistic country.
Although Rousseau may have given civil religion its first elaboration in political theory, the phenomenon predates him by many centuries. The French historian Numa Denis Fustel de Coulanges identified forms of civil religion in the foundations of the ancient city-states of Greece and Rome. And the Greek historian Polybius, writing in the 2nd century bce, observed elements of civil religion in his study of the Roman constitution. Polybius remarked that superstition bound the Roman state together, adding—with admiration—that this made Rome decisively superior in the sphere of religion. The Romans’ public form of religion stimulated magistrates to be scrupulous and dutiful, Polybius proposed, while the fickle, lawless masses remained restrained by their fear of gods and punishment in the afterlife.
In the 1960s sociologist Robert Neelly Bellah proposed that civil religion exists in the United States, which is suffused with various rituals that unite its citizens, employing symbols that are drawn from specific religions but which operate independently of those origins. He reckoned that the United States has its own series of saints and martyrs (such as George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Abraham Lincoln) and that an examination of founding documents and important inaugural addresses shows how it operates on the idea that it is a nation chosen by God. However, while unifying symbols, founding myths, and public rituals may be found across a country, it is unclear whether civil religion is necessary for a country’s foundation or ultimate success.

" height="20" alt="HEW Logo">