centralization
Quick Summary
Centralization in government and politics refers to the concentration of power and authority within a central or national organization. This process involves bringing various functions and agencies of government under the control of a single, overarching authority.1
While centralization can lead to efficient resource allocation and economic stability, as argued by economist Richard Musgrave, it also presents challenges. These include a potential lack of accountability for local governments and the risk of concentrating power in the hands of a few. Historically, empires like ancient Rome and Qin Dynasty China exemplified centralized rule, often maintained through coercion. In modern times, a trend toward greater centralization is observed even in federal systems, where national governments increasingly influence areas previously managed by regional or local authorities.21345
Ask Britannica AI about this topic
Britannica doesn't have a full article on this topic, so we've curated a list of our relevant coverage.
IndiaTrends in early Indian societyCentralized imperialism, which was attempted under the Mauryan empire (c. 325–185 bce), gave way gradually to decentralized administration and to what has been called a feudalistic pattern in the post-Gupta period—i.e., from the 7th century ce. Although the village as an administrative and social unit…
Read MoreCentralized imperialism, which was attempted under the Mauryan empire (c. 325–185 bce), gave way gradually to decentralized administration and to what has been called a feudalistic pattern in the post-Gupta period—i.e., from the 7th century ce. Although the village as an administrative and social unit…
Read More
history of Latin AmericaConstitutions…erect stronger and more highly centralized states, again carefully laying out their programs in constitutions. This shift was not a rejection of foreign models. On the contrary, this change followed the evolution of European political thought; Latin American elites were now basing their ideas on different foreign theories, turning away…
Read More…erect stronger and more highly centralized states, again carefully laying out their programs in constitutions. This shift was not a rejection of foreign models. On the contrary, this change followed the evolution of European political thought; Latin American elites were now basing their ideas on different foreign theories, turning away…
Read More
RussiaTrends in the 17th century…with which the extension of central authority overwhelmed all other political and social forces is to be explained by the frailty of local institutions and by the absence of independent ecclesiastical or social authority. The Muscovite administration was extended first into the devastated areas, where local institutions had been swept…
Read More…with which the extension of central authority overwhelmed all other political and social forces is to be explained by the frailty of local institutions and by the absence of independent ecclesiastical or social authority. The Muscovite administration was extended first into the devastated areas, where local institutions had been swept…
Read More- RussiaThe Petrine state
…attention almost entirely on the central administration, for which his reforms provided the basic framework within which the imperial government was to operate until its fall in 1917. To prosecute the war, the Petrine state had to mobilize all the resources of the country and to supervise practically every aspect…
Read More…attention almost entirely on the central administration, for which his reforms provided the basic framework within which the imperial government was to operate until its fall in 1917. To prosecute the war, the Petrine state had to mobilize all the resources of the country and to supervise practically every aspect…
Read More