- Related Topics:
- spitting
- cooperative hunting
- crèche
- huddle
- swarming
Animal social behavior
-
What is animal social behavior?
Animal social behavior refers to interactions between two or more animals, typically of the same species. These interactions can range from simple attraction to complex societies featuring division of labor, cooperation, and altruism.
While the word "social" often implies friendliness, social behavior also includes competition and aggression. Social interactions enhance an individual’s ability to secure resources, form alliances, survive, and reproduce. Social behavior is influenced by the costs and benefits to the individuals involved.
The pinnacle of social behavior is found in eusocial species, such as ants and bees, where most individuals cooperate to aid a few reproductive group members.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Why do animals interact with each other?
Animals interact for reasons ranging from simple attraction to complex cooperation, altruism, and competition. Social behavior enhances an individual’s ability to gather resources, form alliances, survive, and reproduce.
Interactions can be mutualistic (both benefit), altruistic (one sacrifices, the other benefits), selfish (one benefits at the other's expense), or spiteful (both are harmed). Animals may group for mating, nesting, feeding, sleeping, huddling, hibernating, and migrating. Communication, individual recognition, cooperation, and efficiency evolve to better exploit group living advantages.
However, group living has costs like competition for resources and increased disease transmission. If social behavior is maintained, even subordinate individuals must benefit more from being social than being alone.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What are some examples of animals living in groups?
Many animals live in groups, displaying complex social behaviors. Examples include:
-
Gray wolves These animals live in packs typically numbering 6-10 individuals, which are family groups with a dominant breeding pair. Living in packs enables wolves to form strong social bonds and defend territory.
-
Chimpanzees These primates are highly social animals that live in communities of up to 100 members. Chimpanzee communities are based on associations between adult males within a home range.
-
Meerkats These mongooses live in cooperative packs of 3-25 individuals. They live in burrow systems and forage together. One meerkat will act as a sentinel, watching for predators while the others forage.
-
Elephants These animals are social, living in herds with complex social structures.
-
Honeybees These insects live in highly organized colonies with a clear division of labor based on age. Tasks are assigned according to age.
7 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
-
How do animals communicate within their groups?
Animals communicate within their groups using a variety of signals to facilitate survival and social cohesion. These signals can be visual, auditory, chemical, tactile, or electrical.
- Functions Animals use signals to attract mates and synchronize mating. They also use them to mediate conflicts, signal aggressive intentions or submission, declare territory ownership, coordinate parental care, coordinate group movements, assemble dispersed group members, or display social affiliations.
- Methods Senders use controlled environmental perturbations that receivers can detect and recognize. Sound production is one mechanism. Visual signals rely on ambient light, and olfactory signaling involves pheromones. Tactile signals involve touching, and some species use electrical discharges.
- Examples Examples include honeybees that perform dances monitored by other workers, eastern tent caterpillars that lay chemical trails for group members to locate food, and cliff swallows that cue in on other birds returning to their nest with food to find productive foraging sites. Dogs use scent, posture, and vocalizations such as barks, growls, and whines to communicate different messages.
- Evolution Evolutionary biologists study nonverbal communication in animals to understand the origins of human nonverbal communication. Studies reveal shared patterns of nonverbal behaviors across species, such as using opposite extremes in posture to signal aggression versus submission.
6 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What roles do different animals play in their social groups?
Animal social groups exhibit a range of roles and structures, from simple aggregations to complex societies. Social behavior is shaped by competition and cooperation, with individuals balancing selfish tendencies and mutual benefits.
Some species, like wolves, live in packs with strict hierarchies led by an alpha pair. Dominance hierarchies, common in mammals and birds, involve linear rankings where individuals are dominant over those below them and submissive to those above. Sociality can lead to communication, cooperation, and individual recognition, enhancing group living.
Within groups, there isn't equality, dominant individuals control resources, making group living less beneficial for subordinates. For social behavior to persist, even subordinates must benefit more from being social than being alone.
4 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How does animal social behavior help species survive and adapt?
Animal social behavior enhances survival and adaptation through various mechanisms. Group living provides benefits such as efficient predator detection and prey acquisition, while cooperative foraging improves access to food resources.
Living in groups also protects members through a dilution effect, where the risk of being preyed upon is reduced due to the predator's limited consumption capacity. Alarm calls and complex signaling within groups further decrease predation risk by coordinating escape and prompting individuals to seek shelter.
Social learning allows the transfer of essential life skills across generations, enabling adaptation to changing environments. This includes knowledge of migration routes, food sources, and predator avoidance, which are crucial for the survival of both individuals and the species.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
Animal social behavior, the suite of interactions that occur between two or more individual animals, usually of the same species, when they form simple aggregations, cooperate in sexual or parental behavior, engage in disputes over territory and access to mates, or simply communicate across space.
Social behavior is defined by interaction, not by how organisms are distributed in space. Clumping of individuals is not a requirement for social behavior, although it does increase opportunities for interaction. When a lone female moth emits a bouquet of pheromones to attract male potential mates, she is engaging in social behavior. When a male red deer (Cervus elaphus) gives a loud roar to signal dominance and keep other males away, he is also being social.
Animal social behavior has piqued the interest of animal behaviorists and evolutionary biologists, and it has also engaged the public, thanks to life science filmmakers who captured the drama and stunning diversity of animal social interactions in documentaries and other media programs.
" height="20" alt="HEW Logo">
General characteristics
Social behavior ranges from simple attraction between individuals to life in complex societies characterized by division of labor, cooperation, altruism, and a great many individuals aiding the reproduction of a relative few. The most widely recognized forms of social behavior, however, involve interaction within aggregations or groups of individuals. Social behaviors, their adaptive value, and their underlying mechanisms are of primary interest to scientists in the fields of animal behavior, behavioral ecology, evolutionary psychology, and biological anthropology.
The word social often connotes amicable interaction, accounting for the common misconception that social behavior always involves cooperation toward some mutually beneficial end. Biologists no longer believe that cooperative behaviors necessarily evolve for the good of the species. Instead, they believe that the unit of natural selection is usually the individual and that social behavior is fraught with competition. English naturalist Charles Darwin, who first brought evolution by natural selection to the attention of the world, introduced this paradigm for thinking about social behavior, noting that it is the best competitors within a species, the “fittest” individuals, that survive and reproduce. Once genetics was integrated into this concept of evolution, it became apparent that such individuals will transmit the most copies of their genes to future generations.
Consistent with Darwin’s ideas, social organisms are often seen to be fiercely competitive and aggressive. For example, friendly interactions among children on a playground can quickly dissolve into fierce competition if there are too few balls or swings. In addition, intense competitive interactions resulting in bodily harm can occur even among family members. Social behavior is designed to enhance an individual’s ability to garner resources and form the alliances that help it to survive and to reproduce. The modern view of social behavior is that it is a product of the competing interests of the individuals involved. Individuals evolve the capacity to behave selfishly and to cooperate or compete when it benefits them to do so. A delicate balance of cooperative and competitive behaviors is thus expected to characterize animal societies.
Categorizing the diversity of social behavior
Social behavior encompasses a wide variety of interactions, from temporary feeding aggregations or mating swarms to multigenerational family groups with cooperative brood care. Over the years, there have been many attempts to classify the diversity of social interactions and understand the evolutionary progression of social behavior.
The trusted destination for professionals, college students, and lifelong learners.
SUBSCRIBE
A series of veteran American entomologists—starting in the 1920s with William Morton Wheeler and continuing into the 1970s with Howard Evans, Charles Michener, and E.O. Wilson—developed a categorization of sociality following two routes, called the parasocial sequence and the subsocial sequence. This classification is based primarily on the involvement of insect parents with their young, whereas classifications of vertebrate sociality are frequently based on spacing behavior or mating system. Both routes culminate in “eusociality,” a system in which the young are cared for cooperatively and the society is segregated into different castes that provide different services.
In the parasocial sequence, adults of the same generation assist one another to varying degrees. At one end of the spectrum are females of communal species; these females cooperate in nest construction but rear their broods separately. In quasisocial species, broods are attended cooperatively, and each female may still reproduce. Semisocial species also practice cooperative brood care, but they possess within the colony a worker caste of individuals that never reproduce. Eusocial species typically engage in cooperative brood care; in addition, they have distinct castes that perform different functions and an overlap of generations within the colony.
The subsocial sequence, the alternate route to eusociality, involves increasingly close association between females and their offspring. In primitively subsocial species, the female provides direct care for a time but departs before the young emerge as adults. This stage is followed by two intermediate subsocial stages: one where the care of young is extended to the point where the mother is present when her offspring mature, and the other where offspring are retained that assist in the rearing of additional broods. At the eusocial end of this sequence, some mature offspring are differentiated into a permanently sterile worker caste—a stage that mirrors the same eusocial outcome achieved by the parasocial sequence described above.
E.O. Wilson, whose Sociobiology: The New Synthesis provided a blueprint for research in this field when it was published in 1975, felt that general classifications of societies invariably fail because they depend on the qualities chosen to divide species, which vary markedly from group to group. Instead, Wilson compiled a set of 10 essential qualities of sociality, including (1) group size, (2) distributions of different age and sex classes, (3) cohesiveness, (4) amount and pattern of connectedness, (5) “permeability,” or the degree to which societies interact with one another, (6) “compartmentalization,” or the extent to which subgroups operate as discrete units, (7) differentiation of roles among group members, (8) integration of behaviors within groups, (9) communication and information flow, and (10) fraction of time devoted to social behavior as opposed to individual maintenance. These overlapping qualities of societies provide a good indication of the complexities involved with classifying, much less understanding, the highly varied social behavior of animals.
While categories of social behavior can be useful, they can also be confusing and misleading. The current tendency is to view sociality as a multifaceted continuum from simple aggregations to the highly organized and complex levels of social organization found in eusocial species. Biologists interested in sociality focus on how cooperation increases an individual’s genetic legacy, either by increasing its ability to produce offspring directly or by increasing the number of offspring produced by relatives.