- Related Topics:
- broker
- ballivus
- law of master and servant
- attornatus
- salesman
agency
-
What does "agency" mean in law?
In law, agency refers to the relationship where one party, known as the principal, engages another, known as the agent, to act on their behalf. This empowers the agent to represent the principal in dealings with a third party.
The agent can make contracts so that the principal can extend their business activities by having people act for them. This includes duties such as diligence, accounting, and good faith. The agentâs authority can be actual or apparent, with the latter extending to transactions the agent is not authorized to undertake. Modern legal systems recognize agency as essential for organizing labor and enabling representation for individuals or entities like partnerships and corporations.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Who is an agent and who is a principal?
In law, agency is a relationship where one party, the principal, engages another, the agent, to act on their behalf. This empowers the agent to deal with a third party on behalf of the principal, affecting the principal's legal position. The agent's role includes duties of diligence, accounting, and good faith towards the principal. The principal must also cooperate with the agentâs service and compensate them. This benefits the principal, who can extend their activities through one or more agents.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How is an agency relationship created?
An agency relationship arises when a principal engages an agent to act on their behalf, enabling the agent to handle tasks, sell goods, or manage business. This relationship is initiated through an agreement where the principal consents, either explicitly via a written power of attorney or implicitly through conduct, indicating an established course of dealing. The agent, in fulfilling their obligations, facilitates legal transactions that bind only the principal, provided the agent acts within their authorized legal scope. This agreement requires no formal process.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What are the main duties of an agent?
In agency law, an agent's main duties to their principal include care, obedience, and loyalty. Agents must act solely for the principal's interests and account for any financial benefits from transactions. They must avoid conflicts of interest, refrain from competing with the principal, and protect confidential information. Agents must also account for any money or property received on behalf of the principal and generally cannot delegate tasks to subagents. Moreover, agents should conduct themselves professionally to avoid disrepute to the principal. The principal must offer regular service opportunities, aid the agent's performance, and compensate them, unless the services are gratuitous.
Created from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How can an agency relationship end?
An agency relationship can end in several ways. The principal can revoke the agent's real authority, or the agent can renounce or revoke their authority. However, if there's a prior agreement not to revoke, doing so may lead to a breach of contract action.
Additionally, the agency relationship terminates by operation of law if either the principal or the agent dies, becomes insane or bankrupt, or if war breaks out. A major exception to the principalâs power of revocation occurs when the agent possesses "authority coupled with an interest".
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What happens if an agent acts outside their authority?
When an agent acts outside their authority, the principal may not be bound by those actions, unless the agent had apparent authority. Apparent authority arises when a principal's actions lead a third party to reasonably believe that the agent has the authority to act, even if the agent lacks real authority.
The agent's liability depends on the situation. Generally, an agent acting without authority is not personally responsible. However, if the agent exceeds their authority, they may be liable to the principal for breach of duty or to the third party for misrepresentation.
The principal can revoke the agent's real authority; however, this does not automatically terminate apparent authority regarding a third party.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
agency, in law, the relationship that exists when one person or party (the principal) engages another (the agent) to act for himâe.g., to do his work, to sell his goods, to manage his business. The law of agency thus governs the legal relationship in which the agent deals with a third party on behalf of the principal. The competent agent is legally capable of acting for this principal vis-Ă -vis the third party. Hence, the process of concluding a contract through an agent involves a twofold relationship. On the one hand, the law of agency is concerned with the external business relations of an economic unit and with the powers of the various representatives to affect the legal position of the principal. On the other hand, it rules the internal relationship between principal and agent as well, thereby imposing certain duties on the representative (diligence, accounting, good faith, etc.). The two relationships need not be in full conformity. Thus, an agentâs effective powers in dealing with outsiders may extend to transactions that he is under a duty to his principal not to undertake, leading to a situation characterized as âapparent authority.â
Agency is recognized in all modern legal systems as an indispensable part of the existing social order. It fulfills the most diverse functions in both public and private law; in particular, it assists in organizing the division of labour in the national and international economy by making it possible for a principal greatly to extend his individual sphere of activity by having one or more persons act for him. In addition to the individual principal, a principal may be composed of a group of persons carrying on a trade or business by way of a partnership, a registered company, or another kind of corporate entity. The need for legal representation in some form has therefore increased as business units have come to involve transactions conducted at a distance (through the use of factors, or commercial agents) or have grown in size (as in the case of the firm, the house, and the corporation). Continental law additionally allows the use of legal representatives, such as the father, mother, guardian, or curator (curateur, tuteur), to enable minors, insane persons, and other legally incapacitated persons to act. Although a similar category of âauthority by lawâ is not unknown in common law, powers based on family relationships are scarce and appear in only a few cases.
Historical development
Roman law
Because concepts grow primarily out of specific situations that have occurred and social needs that have arisen, the doctrine of legal representation developed differently in different times and places, sometimes even within a single legal system. At first it seemed unthinkable that an agent, by making a contract with a third party, could create obligatory rights and duties between a third party and a principal. Even the official law of the Roman Empire never fully recognized the principle of representation. The explanation for this rejection lies mainly in the early Roman conception of a contractual obligation as a personal relationship binding the parties in some quasi-mystical way. This type of relationship allowed creditors in some instances to seize the possessionsâand in very early times also the personâof the debtor. Usually the formation of such a relationship between two parties took place in a solemn ceremony at which both parties had to be present, certain formal words spoken, and definite acts performed. In such a situation it was impossible to confer right or duties on a third party. On the other hand, the head of the household could transact business through his slaves or his dependent sons, who were not conceived of as agents but as âlong armâ extensions of the contracting master or father. Because of the wide prevalence of slavery, there was no great need for a true agency relationship. As Roman law later developed, the formalities connected with creating legal relationships became less important, and the need for personal representation in commerce increased. In the meantime, however, legal theory and practice had developed so many ways to evade the problem that there was no longer an urgent need for Roman law to overcome its stark conservatism and to develop a legal institution that it had earlier opposed.
" height="20" alt="HEW Logo">
Medieval influence of canon law and Germanic law
Labouring under the influence of Roman law, legal development in the Middle Ages strove to overcome disadvantages in daily commercial life caused by the Roman rejection of the principle of agency. Through the efforts of legal scholars (glossators and commentators), Roman law was further developed by means of extensions, emphases, and exceptionsâa process already sanctioned by the Romans themselves. Additional impetus for change came from Roman Catholic Church canon law. Although manifestly structured after Roman civil law, canon law had its own special development, influenced by Hebraic theological concepts. Certain writers succeeded as early as 1200 in constructing a type of agency relationship based on the position of procurator, a relationship intended to solve the representation problem in all except legal matters. The issue nevertheless remained in dispute.
About this time, the doctrine of principal and agent developed in England as an outgrowth or expansion of the doctrine of master and servant. Anglo-Norman law created the figures of ballivus and attornatus. His position in the household of his master empowered the ballivus to transact commercial business for his master, reminiscent of the power of the slave to bind his master under Roman law. Later the ballivus was given more authority, especially in his frequent role as land administrator, gradually becoming competent to act independently for his master. On the other hand, the attornatus, originally just a representative of one of the parties in litigation, soon assumed a position of broader importance. Certain contracts were effective only when made in a judicially prescribed manner. For this reason, the formation of this type of contract always had to be concluded in a court proceeding in which an attornatus represented each party. This was the beginning of the role of the attornatus as a general agent.