Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry

In Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry, Alasdair MacIntyre argues that modern moral theories fail to provide a rational basis for moral norms. He suggests that these norms can only regain intelligibility if they are understood within the framework of an earlier ethical system, specifically Aristotelianism.1

MacIntyre proposes that a tradition's rationality can be demonstrated by its ability to succeed on its own terms and to explain the failures of rival traditions. He contends that Aristotelian ethics and politics can illuminate the shortcomings of Enlightenment moral theories and the limitations of nation-state-based political discourse, thereby showing their own rational superiority.1