The Language of Morals
Quick Summary
In The Language of Morals (1952), R.M. Hare proposed that moral judgments are not descriptions but rather prescriptions, akin to imperatives. He argued that while deriving an "ought" from an "is" is impossible, moral reasoning is constrained by the principle of universalizability. This means that if one judges an action as wrong, they must also judge any relevantly similar action as wrong. Universalizability is a logical feature of moral terms, not a substantive moral principle. Hare's work aimed to show that moral freedom, while present, is compatible with reasoning about moral judgments.123
- prescriptivism
- history of ethics - Universal prescriptivism
- ethics - Universal prescriptivism
- history of ethics - Ethics and reasons for action
- morality
- history of ethics - The climax of moral sense theory: Hutcheson and Hume
- ethics - The climax of moral sense theory: Hutcheson and Hume
- A Word on 'Descriptive' and 'Prescriptive' Defining
Ask Britannica AI about this topic
Britannica doesn't have a full article on this topic, so we've curated a list of our relevant coverage.
ethicsUniversal prescriptivismIn The Language of Morals (1952), the British philosopher R.M. Hare (1919ā2002) supported some elements of emotivism but rejected others. He agreed that moral judgments are not primarily descriptions of anything; but neither, he said, are they simply expressions of attitudes. Instead, he suggested that moralā¦
Read MoreIn The Language of Morals (1952), the British philosopher R.M. Hare (1919ā2002) supported some elements of emotivism but rejected others. He agreed that moral judgments are not primarily descriptions of anything; but neither, he said, are they simply expressions of attitudes. Instead, he suggested that moralā¦
Read More- prescriptivism
Hare (born 1919) in The Language of Morals (1952). Hare argued that it is impossible to derive any prescription from a set of descriptive sentences, but tried nevertheless to provide a foothold for moral reasoning in the constraint that moral judgments must be āuniversalizableā: that is, that if oneā¦
Read MoreHare (born 1919) in The Language of Morals (1952). Hare argued that it is impossible to derive any prescription from a set of descriptive sentences, but tried nevertheless to provide a foothold for moral reasoning in the constraint that moral judgments must be āuniversalizableā: that is, that if oneā¦
Read More