Rucho v. Common Cause
Learn about this topic in these articles:
Supreme Court of the United StatesHistorical trends…contrast, the Court ruled in Rucho v. Common Cause (2019) that the common practice of partisan gerrymandering, which it had previously ruled (or at least recognized) as unconstitutional under the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, presents “political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts.” As a result,…
Read More…contrast, the Court ruled in Rucho v. Common Cause (2019) that the common practice of partisan gerrymandering, which it had previously ruled (or at least recognized) as unconstitutional under the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, presents “political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts.” As a result,…
Read More- Select Decisions of the United States Supreme Court
Rucho v. Common Cause 2019 Held that claims of partisan gerrymandering of U.S. congressional districts by state legislatures present “political questions” and are therefore “nonjusticiable,” or beyond the jurisdiction of federal courts. Bostock v. Clay County, Georgia 2020 Ruled that firing an employee for being…
Read MoreRucho v. Common Cause 2019 Held that claims of partisan gerrymandering of U.S. congressional districts by state legislatures present “political questions” and are therefore “nonjusticiable,” or beyond the jurisdiction of federal courts. Bostock v. Clay County, Georgia 2020 Ruled that firing an employee for being…
Read More

