Ninth Amendment
-
What is the Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution?
The Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights, ratified in 1791. It states that the enumeration of specific rights in the Constitution does not deny or disparage other rights retained by the people.
The Ninth Amendment was born out of the debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists regarding the protection of individual rights. Anti-Federalists feared the federal government would have too much power without a bill of rights. Federalists believed that listing protected rights could be a detriment to individual liberties, implying other liberties were unworthy of protection.
The Supreme Court has rarely relied on the Ninth Amendment. However, it has emerged as a secondary source of liberties, especially concerning privacy rights.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Why was the Ninth Amendment added to the Bill of Rights?
The Ninth Amendment was added to the Bill of Rights because Anti-Federalists were concerned that the Constitution would give the federal government too much power without a bill of rights. Federalists believed that the Constitution created a limited central government, so a list of protected rights might harm individual liberties by implying other liberties were unworthy of protection.
The Ninth Amendment states that the enumeration of certain rights in the Constitution should not deny or disparage others retained by the people. It asserts that the enumerated rights are not exhaustive or final, and listing certain rights does not deny the existence of other rights.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What does the Ninth Amendment say about rights not listed in the Constitution?
The Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution, ratified in 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights, addresses rights not explicitly listed in the Constitution. It states that the enumeration of specific rights in the Constitution does not deny or disparage other rights retained by the people.
The amendment arose from debates during the Constitution's ratification, with Anti-Federalists fearing too much power vested in the federal government without a bill of rights. Federalists argued that listing protected rights could be detrimental to individual liberties by implying unlisted liberties were unworthy of protection. The Ninth Amendment thus asserts that enumerated rights are not exhaustive and that the existence of other rights is not denied.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How does the Ninth Amendment protect individual freedoms?
The Ninth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1791, is part of the Bill of Rights. It states that the enumeration of specific rights in the Constitution does not deny or disparage other rights retained by the people.
The amendment arose from debates during the Constitution's ratification, with Anti-Federalists fearing too much federal power without a bill of rights. Federalists argued that listing protected rights might harm individual liberties by implying unlisted liberties were unworthy of protection. The Ninth Amendment asserts that enumerated rights are not exhaustive, ensuring that the listing of some rights does not deny others.
Since the Bill of Rights' enactment, the Supreme Court has rarely relied primarily on the Ninth Amendment.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Can you give examples of rights the Ninth Amendment might protect?
The Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution states that the enumeration of specific rights in the Constitution does not deny or disparage other rights retained by the people.
Examples of rights the Ninth Amendment might protect:
* The right to use birth control
* Other fundamental personal rights that exist alongside those specifically mentioned in the first eight constitutional amendmentsThe Supreme Court has never relied solely on the Ninth Amendment, but it has emerged as important in the extension of the rights of privacy.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How has the Ninth Amendment been interpreted by the Supreme Court?
The Ninth Amendment states that the enumeration of specific rights in the Constitution does not mean that other rights retained by the people are not also protected.
The Supreme Court has rarely relied on the Ninth Amendment. Justice Robert H. Jackson called it a "mystery." However, it has emerged as a secondary source of liberties, especially concerning privacy rights.
In Griswold v. State of Connecticut (1965), Justice Arthur Goldberg, in his concurring opinion, argued the Ninth Amendment protects fundamental rights not listed in the first eight amendments, though the majority based the decision on the Fourth and Fifth Amendments. Justice Potter Stewart dissented, stating that the Ninth Amendment simply clarifies that the federal government has limited powers and that rights not delegated to it are retained by the people and the states.
Since Griswold, numerous claims have been made that additional rights are protected by the Ninth Amendment, but most have been rejected.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
Ninth Amendment, amendment (1791) to the Constitution of the United States, part of the Bill of Rights, formally stating that the people retain rights absent specific enumeration.
The full text of the Ninth Amendment is:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Prior to, during, and after ratification of the Constitution, debate raged about the protection of individual rights. Eventually, a Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution at the urging of the Anti-Federalists, who feared that without one, too much power would be vested in the federal government. Federalists, who believed that the Constitution had created a limited central government, countered that an enumeration of protected rights would be a possible detriment to individual liberties and render other liberties presumably unworthy of constitutional protection. Thus was born the Ninth Amendment, whose purpose was to assert the principle that the enumerated rights are not exhaustive and final and that the listing of certain rights does not deny or disparage the existence of other rights. What rights were protected by the amendment was left unclear.
Since the enactment of the Bill of Rights, the U.S. Supreme Court has never relied solely (or primarily) on the Ninth Amendment, and through the mid-1960s it was mentioned only sparingly. Indeed, in 1955 in a lecture (later turned into book form) titled “The Supreme Court in the American System of Government,” Justice Robert H. Jackson admitted that the Ninth Amendment was a “mystery” to him. Since that time, however, the Ninth Amendment has been used as a secondary source of liberties and has emerged as important in the extension of the rights of privacy.
In Griswold v. State of Connecticut (1965), the Supreme Court held that married couples had the right to use birth control. The majority decision rested on Fourth and Fifth Amendment grounds, but Justice Arthur Goldberg based his concurring opinion squarely on Ninth Amendment principles, stating that
the language and history of the Ninth Amendment reveal that the Framers of the Constitution believed that there are additional fundamental rights, protected from governmental infringement, which exist alongside those fundamental rights specifically mentioned in the first eight constitutional amendments.
Taking that argument one step further, Goldberg claimed that
The trusted destination for professionals, college students, and lifelong learners.
SUBSCRIBE
other fundamental personal rights should not be denied such protection or disparaged in any other way simply because they are not specifically listed in the first eight constitutional amendments.
Goldberg’s invoking of the Ninth Amendment was criticized in a dissenting opinion by Justice Potter Stewart who wrote that
to say that the Ninth Amendment has anything to do with this case is to turn somersaults with history. The Ninth Amendment, like its companion, the Tenth…was framed by James Madison and adopted by the States simply to make clear that the adoption of the Bill of Rights did not alter the plan that the Federal Government was to be a government of express and limited powers, and that all rights and powers not delegated to it were retained by the people and the individual States. Until today, no member of this Court has ever suggested that the Ninth Amendment meant anything else, and the idea that a federal court could ever use the Ninth Amendment to annul a law passed by the elected representatives of the people of the State of Connecticut would have caused James Madison no little wonder.
In the decades since the Griswold decision, numerous claims were made in federal filings that additional rights were protected by the Ninth Amendment (almost all were rejected), and there has been considerable debate as to what protections, if any, are guaranteed by it. Some federal courts have used the Ninth Amendment as a guidepost in their decisions, but it still has not been central to any decision.