National Black Political Convention

National Black Political Convention, three-day conference of African American politicians, civil rights leaders, and delegates held in Gary, Indiana, in 1972. It was the largest Black political gathering in U.S. history up to that point, with a crowd of at least 8,000 attendees. It represented an effort to build a coalition of Black revolutionaries, moderates, and conservatives on the basis of their shared racial identity and to establish new political strategies for the period following the passage of the Voting Rights Act (which made it much easier for African Americans to win elected office) and the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr.

However, the conference was rife with conflict, and in its aftermath the Congressional Black Caucus essentially repudiated the official statements that emerged from the meeting. Nevertheless, historians generally agree that it was one of the most important events in Black politics following the civil rights era (from the mid-1950s to the late 1960s), though some maintain that it was ultimately a failure. Instead of producing any lasting agreement or cementing a broad new coalition, the convention brought the existing conflicts among Black leaders and intellectuals into sharper relief.

Lead-up to the convention

Throughout the civil rights movement and for decades leading up to it, there was a meaningful degree of consensus among Black leaders about their most pressing political goals—even if they disagreed about the best tactics for pursuing them. But after the passage of the Civil Rights Act (1964) and the Voting Rights Act(1965), that consensus disappeared. The debate shifted from strategies to more fundamental questions about goals and priorities. King’s assassination in 1968 further eroded any sense of political unity.

Discover how ordinary objects work, and expand your understanding of the familiar.

SIGN UP

" height="20" alt="HEW Logo">

Thank you for signing up!"

Back to homepage

By clicking "Sign Up", you consent to the Britannica Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

At the same time, African Americans were rapidly gaining political power, from the local level up to Congress. Between 1964 and 1972 the number of eligible Black American voters increased from 10.3 million to 13.5 million, and the number of Black elected officials increased from 100 in 1964 to 1,400 in 1970. By 1974 this figure had risen to 3,499. Black mayors had taken office in many large cities, including Los Angeles (Tom Bradley), Detroit (Coleman Young), Atlanta (Maynard Jackson), Newark (Kenneth Gibson), Cleveland (Carl Stokes), Cincinnati (Theodore Berry), and the convention’s host city, Gary, where Richard Hatcher had become the chief executive in 1967.

Planning for the 1972 convention had started in 1970 at the Congress of African People held at Atlanta University (now Clark Atlanta University). One of the principal goals agreed upon at that meeting had been the need for the formation of an independent Black political party, an idea that originated with the activist and writer Amiri Baraka. During the sessions, the delegates agreed to call another conference by 1972, “not only to flesh out the united front structure,” Baraka later wrote, “but also to choose candidates to run in the major elections and to give black people a unified voice in dealing with the presidential election.”

Three days in Gary

Black leaders and delegates from across the political spectrum were invited to participate. From March 10 to March 12 some 8,000 attendees met in the gymnasium of Gary’s West Side High School, because the city did not have any hotels large enough to accommodate the crowd. “The setting of the Convention sent a strong message that this was a grassroots effort designed to meet the needs of the black masses and not the needs of the black elite,” historian Leonard N. Moore wrote in The Defeat of Black Power: Civil Rights and the National Black Political Convention of 1972 (2018).

Some of the major questions considered were whether the convention should endorse a candidate in the 1972 presidential election, whether to form a distinct political party, and, more broadly, whether to take a separatist, Black nationalist tack or an integrationist one. The agenda also included discussions of traditional liberal reform planks, such as national health insurance and federal jobs programs. “Thus, the agenda was internally contradictory, blending elements of reform and revolution,” wrote political scientist Robert C. Smith in We Have No Leaders: African Americans in the Post-Civil Rights Era (1996), adding, “This was by design, since the leadership did not wish to offend any of the ideological factions represented at the convention.”

Explore Britannica Premium!

The trusted destination for professionals, college students, and lifelong learners.

SUBSCRIBE

The gathering successfully agreed on several measures. It passed one resolution condemning forced busing as a means of school desegregation and another supporting the “struggles of Palestine for self-determination.” It also produced a document called “The National Black Political Agenda,” which called for reparations and a new constitutional convention. But the integrationists who attended were leery of these decisions, and the apparent consensus would not last long.

Aftermath

A few weeks after the convention, the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) issued its own alternative agenda, the Black Declaration of Independence and the Black Bill of Rights. Smith characterized these documents—which called for reforms in employment, health, and education policies, among other areas—as “essentially a repackaging of the caucus’s [previous] recommendations to President Nixon.” At a press conference, the CBC leaders emphasized their support for busing policies and the state of Israel.

Baraka fired back and accused the CBC of undercutting the achievements of the convention and prioritizing their own political careers over the interests of African Americans as a whole.

In Smith’s analysis, the Black press’s evaluation of the convention was divided into two camps. The dominant view was summed up in the title of Thomas A. Johnson’s essay in The New York Times: “We Met, Therefore We Won.” This was the notion that the convention succeeded merely by bringing together such a diverse group. The minority view was expressed in a Chicago Defender editorial, which argued that “no clear leadership” had emerged and that the convention “did not live up to its roseate promise.”

In The Defeat of Black Power: Civil Rights and the National Black Political Convention of 1972, Moore argues that the convention precipitated the decline of the Black Power movement but that it also presaged Barack Obama’s election to the presidency in 2008.

The convention was also the subject of the documentary Nationtime (1972), directed by William Greaves and narrated by Sidney Poitier and Harry Belafonte. For decades, only a 60-minute edited version of the film was in circulation, but in 2020 the full 80-minute version was restored and released in cinemas and on streaming platforms.