- Areas Of Involvement:
- Roman Catholicism
- grace
Jansenism
-
What was Jansenism?
Jansenism was a Roman Catholic religious movement in the 17th and 18th centuries that occurred primarily in France, the Low Countries, and Italy. It began as an effort to reconcile divine grace and human freedom, but it became embroiled in political and religious conflicts.
The movement was initiated by Cornelius Otto Jansen, whose views were published posthumously in Augustinus in 1640. Jansen and his followers stressed the damage caused to human nature by original sin. They also emphasized the importance of God's grace through Christ.
The publication of Augustinus sparked controversy, with the Jesuits accusing it of undermining free will and rejecting universal redemption. Despite papal condemnations, Jansenism spread, attracting influential figures such as Blaise Pascal and Jean Racine.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Who started the Jansenist movement and when did it begin?
The chief initiator of Jansenism, a Roman Catholic religious movement, was Cornelius Otto Jansen, a theologian at the University of Leuven and later bishop of Ypres. Jansen's views were published posthumously in 1640 in his Augustinus, a treatise defending the theology of St. Augustine. Although condemned by Pope Urban VIII in 1642, it was of critical importance in the Jansenist movement.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What were the main beliefs of Jansenism?
Jansenism was a controversial Roman Catholic religious movement in the 17th and 18th centuries that tried to reconcile divine grace and human freedom. It arose from Cornelius Otto Jansen's Augustinus, which defended St. Augustine's theology. Jansen and his followers claimed that Counter-Reformation theologians had erred by emphasizing human responsibility at the expense of divine initiative, thus approaching the 5th-century heresy of Pelagianism.
Jansenism stressed the damage to human nature caused by original sin. It also emphasized the all-powerful character of grace and supported arguments regarding the necessity and infallible efficacy of grace, as well as the absolute arbitrariness of predestination. Jansenism was based on mentality and spirituality, with the goal of reforming the church in the spirit of early Christianity.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Why did Jansenism come into conflict with the Roman Catholic Church?
Jansenism, a Roman Catholic movement in the 17th and 18th centuries, clashed with the Church due to differing views on divine grace, human freedom, and salvation. Initiated by Cornelius Otto Jansen, it was influenced by St. Augustine and reacted to Counter-Reformation theology, emphasizing original sin and the necessity of God’s grace for salvation.
The publication of Jansen's Augustinus sparked controversy, with Jesuits accusing it of undermining free will and redemption. The papacy condemned Jansenist propositions in 1653, demanding submission, but Jansenists resisted, leading to further condemnations and political struggles. Although it was an attempt to reform the church in the spirit of early Christianity, the church rejected it as unorthodox.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How did Jansenism affect religious life in France?
Jansenism, arising in France, the Low Countries, and Italy, was a controversial Roman Catholic religious movement in the 17th and 18th centuries. Jansenism was rooted in Augustine’s theology, emphasizing humanity’s innate depravity due to original sin and the necessity of God’s grace for salvation.
Jansenism advocated for a reform of the church in the spirit of early Christianity. It stood against what it considered a compromising approach to true Christian theology and practice but was ultimately rejected by the church as an exaggerated and unorthodox position. Though condemned, Jansenism contributed to an evangelical reawakening in France and throughout the church in the 19th and 20th centuries.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What led to the decline and eventual disappearance of Jansenism?
Jansenism, a controversial religious movement within the Roman Catholic Church, declined due to several factors:
- Papal opposition The papacy struck out against Jansenism in 1653, when Innocent X issued his bull Cum occasione, and again in 1713, when Clement XI promulgated his constitution Unigenitus.
- Royal decrees Louis XIV of France, determined to eliminate the Jansenists, obtained the bull Vineam domini from Clement XI in 1705, which renewed earlier condemnations, and then in 1713 the bull Unigenitus, which condemned 101 propositions of Quesnel. The promulgation of Unigenitus as French law in 1730 caused a decline in the strength of the Jansenist party.
- Internal divisions and compromise Some Jansenists were willing to compromise and sign the formulary condemning Jansen, while others refused, leading to internal divisions and weakening the movement.
Although organized Jansenism dwindled, its influence persisted, contributing to an evangelical reawakening within the church in the 19th and 20th centuries.
4 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
Jansenism, in Roman Catholic history, a controversial religious movement in the 17th and 18th centuries that arose out of the theological problem of reconciling divine grace and human freedom. Jansenism appeared chiefly in France, the Low Countries, and Italy. In France it became connected with the struggle against the papacy by proponents of Gallicanism—a political theory advocating the restriction of papal power—and with opposition to the monarchical absolutism of Armand-Jean du Plessis Cardinal de Richelieu and Louis XIV.
The chief initiator of the movement was Cornelius Otto Jansen, a theologian at the University of Leuven (Louvain) and later bishop of Ypres. Jansen’s views were published posthumously in 1640 in his Augustinus, a vast treatise defending the theology of St. Augustine of Hippo (354–430) and attacking certain teachings and practices associated especially with the Jesuit order. Jansen and his followers claimed that in their opposition to the doctrines of grace defined by Martin Luther (1483–1546) and John Calvin (1509–64), the theologians of the Counter-Reformation had erred in the other direction, emphasizing human responsibility at the expense of the divine initiative and thus relapsing into the 5th-century heresy of Pelagianism—the teaching that humanity is essentially good and can attain salvation without divine aid. Against these alleged Pelagian tendencies, Jansen stressed the damage caused to human nature by original sin—the innate depravity of humanity due to the primordial fall and requiring God’s grace to be saved—and the power of concupiscence; exalted the all-powerful character of the grace made available by Christ the Redeemer that is the sole means of restoring humanity to true freedom; and supported the Augustinian arguments regarding the necessity of grace for any good act, the infallible efficacy of grace, and the absolutely arbitrary character of predestination. Consistent with this pessimistic view of human nature and freedom were the rigoristic views on the sacraments of penance and Holy Communion and on moral issues taken by Jansenism.
The publication of the Augustinus aroused violent controversy. The work was accused, chiefly by the Jesuits, of divesting free will of all reality and of rejecting the universality of the redemption. Nevertheless, the Jansenist interpretation of Christianity spread. It was defended by such disciples as Jean Duvergier de Hauranne, abbot of Saint-Cyran; the nuns of the celebrated Cistercian convent of Port-Royal des Champs; Antoine Arnauld, who became leader of the Jansenist movement; and Pasquier Quesnel, who organized the Jansenist group into a political party at the end of the 17th century. It also attracted such influential figures in French society as the philosopher and mathematician Blaise Pascal and the dramatist Jean Racine.
The papacy struck out against Jansenism in 1653 with the publication of the bull Cum occasione (“With Occasion”) by Innocent X, which condemned five of Jansen’s propositions on the relationship of grace and freedom. The Jansenists acknowledged the heretical tendencies contained in the propositions and the authority of the decision but denied that the propositions in question could be ascribed to Jansen. The general assembly of the French clergy and Pope Alexander VII in 1665 called upon the Jansenists to subscribe to a formula of submission that acknowledged the fact of Jansen’s heretical status. Although Louis XIV was determined to eliminate the Jansenists as a threat to the unity of his kingdom, there was a temporary peace after Clement IX became pope in 1667, and the conflict ceased to be a major concern when the papacy and the French Church clashed on Gallicanism. But after the controversy between the papacy and the monarchy was settled, Louis XIV obtained from Clement XI in 1705 the bull Vineam domini (“Vineyard of the Lord”), which renewed the earlier condemnations, and then in 1713 the bull Unigenitus, which condemned 101 propositions of Quesnel. The promulgation of Unigenitus as French law in 1730 finally caused the decline in strength of the Jansenist party. Organized Jansenism survived only in Holland, where it still exists as a church in Utrecht. It also spread to Italy, where in 1786 the Synod of Pistoia, which was later condemned, propounded extreme Jansenist doctrines.
Jansenism was a complex movement based more on a certain mentality and spirituality than on specific doctrines. It was an attempt, in line with that of the Reformation theologians, to reform the church in the spirit of early Christianity. It opposed what, in its view, was a compromising approach to true Christian theology and practice but was rejected by the church as an exaggerated and unorthodox position.

" height="20" alt="HEW Logo">